![Living by Chemistry](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781464142314/9781464142314_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Interpretation:
The correct option for the
Concept introduction:
For a chemical species, reduction potential is defined as the tendency to gain an electron and get reduced.
The potential of each redox couple under the standard state (concentration = 1 M, T = 298 K and P = 1 atm) for all regents is said to be the standard reduction potential,
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 18STP
The correct option is (c) as
Explanation of Solution
The two half-reactions and their reduction potential values are:
The higher value of reduction potential indicates that it has a greater tendency to gain electron and reduce then the other species which has lower reduction potential. Since, the reduction potential of zinc is greater than lithium so, the zinc will undergo reduction and lithium will undergo oxidationfor the given electrochemical cell.
The reduction reaction will take place at cathode and oxidation at anode. The half-cell reactions are:
The cell potential is determined by difference between the reduction potential of two electrodes (cathode and anode). The formula is:
The value of
Hence, the correct option is (c) as
Chapter U5 Solutions
Living by Chemistry
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (3rd Edition)
Microbiology: An Introduction
Organic Chemistry (8th Edition)
Introductory Chemistry (6th Edition)
Human Biology: Concepts and Current Issues (8th Edition)
Cosmic Perspective Fundamentals
- How many milliliters of 97.5(±0.5) wt% H2SO4 with a density of 1.84(±0.01) g/mL will you need to prepare 2.000 L of 0.110 M H2SO4? If the uncertainty in delivering H2SO4 is ±0.01 mL, calculate the absolute uncertainty in the molarity (0.110 M). Assume there is negligible uncertainty in the formula mass of H2SO4 and in the final volume (2.000 L) and assume random error.arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardWhat should be use to complete the reaction? CN CNarrow_forward
- Don't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forward* How many milliliters of 97.5(±0.5) wt% H2SO4 with a density of 1.84(±0.01) g/mL will you need to prepare 2.000 L of 0.110 M H2SO4? * If the uncertainty in delivering H2SO4 is ±0.01 mL, calculate the absolute uncertainty in the molarity (0.110 M). Assume there is negligible uncertainty in the formula mass of NaOH and in the final volume (2.000 L) and assume random error.arrow_forward
- You are tasked with creating a calibration curve for the absorbance of cobalt solutions of various concentrations. You must prepare 5 standards with concentrations between 1.00 mg/L and 10.0 mg/L Co2+. You have a stock solution with a concentration of 40 mg/L Co2+ and all the standard lab glassware including transfer pipets and flasks. Explain how you would make your 5 standard solutions of various concentrations, including what glassware you would use to measure and prepare each solution.arrow_forwardPredict the product and write the mechanism. CH3-CH=CH-CH2-CH3 + NBS- hv CCl4arrow_forwardHow exactly is carbon disulfide used in industry? Specifically, where does it come in during rubber or textile production and what is the chemical processes?arrow_forward
- A researcher has developed a new analytical method to determine the percent by mass iron in solids. To test the new method, the researcher purchases a standard reference material sample that is 2.85% iron by mass. Analysis of the iron standard with the new method returns values of 2.75%, 2.89%, 2.77%, 2.81%, and 2.87%. Does the new method produce a result that is significantly different from the standard value at the 95% confidence level?arrow_forwardCreate a drawing of an aceral with at least 2 isopropoxy groups, and a total of 11 carbon atomsarrow_forward4. Predict the major product(s) for each of the following reactions. HBr (1 equiv.) peroxide, A a. b. NBS, peroxide, Aarrow_forward
- ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781259911156Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationPrinciples of Instrumental AnalysisChemistryISBN:9781305577213Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. CrouchPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Organic ChemistryChemistryISBN:9780078021558Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.Publisher:McGraw-Hill EducationChemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage LearningElementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...ChemistryISBN:9781118431221Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. BullardPublisher:WILEY
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305957404/9781305957404_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259911156/9781259911156_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305577213/9781305577213_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780078021558/9780078021558_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305079373/9781305079373_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118431221/9781118431221_smallCoverImage.gif)