Explanation Given: The length of the fin is L = 50 mm . The base thickness of the fin is t = 20 mm . The thermal conductivity of the fin is k = 25 W / m ⋅ K . The base temperature of the fin is T b = 50 °C . The temperature of the surrounding fluid is T ∞ = 20 °C . The convection heat transfer coefficient is h = 50 W / m 2 ⋅ K . The length of the grid is Δ x = 10 mm . The with of the grid is Δ y = 2 mm . Formula Used: The nodal distance along the inclined surface is given by, Δ s = ( Δ x ) 2 + ( Δ y ) 2 The finite difference equation at the node 7 is given by, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 7 − T 1 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 8 − T 7 ) Δ y + k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 12 − T 7 ) Δ x = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 8 is given by, k Δ y ( T 2 − T 8 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 7 − T 8 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 13 − T 8 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 9 − T 8 ) Δ y = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 9 is given by, k Δ y ( T 3 − T 9 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 8 − T 9 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 14 − T 9 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 10 − T 9 ) Δ y = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 10 is given by, k Δ y ( T 4 − T 10 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 9 − T 10 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 15 − T 10 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 11 − T 10 ) Δ y = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 11 is given by, k Δ y ( T 5 − T 11 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 10 − T 11 ) Δ y + h Δ s ( T ∞ − T 11 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 12 is given by, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 7 − T 12 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 13 − T 12 ) Δ y + k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 16 − T 12 ) Δ x = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 13 is given by, k Δ y ( T 8 − T 13 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 12 − T 13 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 17 − T 13 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 14 − T 13 ) Δ y = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 14 is given by, k Δ y ( T 9 − T 14 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 13 − T 14 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 18 − T 14 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 15 − T 14 ) Δ y = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 15 is given by, k Δ y ( T 10 − T 15 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 14 − T 15 ) Δ y + h Δ s ( T ∞ − T 15 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 16 is given by, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 12 − T 16 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 17 − T 16 ) Δ y + k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 19 − T 16 ) Δ x = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 17 is given by, k Δ y ( T 13 − T 17 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 16 − T 17 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 20 − T 17 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 18 − T 17 ) Δ y = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 18 is given by, k Δ y ( T 14 − T 18 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 17 − T 18 ) Δ y + h Δ s ( T ∞ − T 18 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 19 is given by, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 16 − T 19 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 20 − T 19 ) Δ y + k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 21 − T 19 ) Δ x = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 20 is given by, k Δ y ( T 17 − T 20 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 19 − T 20 ) Δ y + h Δ s ( T ∞ − T 20 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 21 is given by, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 19 − T 21 ) Δ x + h ( Δ s 2 ) ( T ∞ − T 21 ) = 0 The conduction heat transfer per unit depth for the fin is given by, q f = 2 [ k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 1 − T 7 ) Δ x + k Δ y ( T 2 − T 8 ) Δ x + k Δ y ( T 3 − T 9 ) Δ x + k Δ y ( T 4 − T 10 ) Δ x + k Δ y ( T 5 − T 11 ) Δ x ] The maximum possible rate of heat transfer per unit depth for fin is given by, q max = h L 2 + ( t 2 ) 2 ( T 1 − T ∞ ) The fin efficiency is given by, η = q f q max The dimensionless fin parameter is given by, m = L c 3 / 2 h k A p Calculation: The nodal distance along the inclined surface is calculated as, Δ s = ( Δ x ) 2 + ( Δ y ) 2 = ( 10 mm ) + ( 2 mm ) = 10.2 mm The finite difference equation at the node 7 is calculated as, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 1 − T 7 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 8 − T 7 ) Δ y + k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 12 − T 7 ) Δ x = 0 ( 25 W / m ⋅ K ) [ ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm 2 ) ( 50 °C − T 7 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 8 − T 7 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm 2 ) ( T 12 − T 7 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ] = 0 ( 50 °C − T 7 ) + 12.5 ( T 8 − T 7 ) + ( T 12 − T 7 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 8 is calculated as, k Δ y ( T 2 − T 8 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 7 − T 8 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 13 − T 8 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 9 − T 8 ) Δ y = 0 ( 25 W / m ⋅ K ) [ ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 50 °C − T 8 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 7 − T 8 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 13 − T 8 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 9 − T 8 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ] = 0 5 ( 50 °C − T 8 ) + 125 ( T 7 − T 8 ) + 5 ( T 13 − T 8 ) + 125 ( T 9 − T 8 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 9 is calculated as, k Δ y ( T 3 − T 9 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 8 − T 9 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 14 − T 9 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 10 − T 9 ) Δ y = 0 ( 25 W / m ⋅ K ) [ ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 50 °C − T 9 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 8 − T 9 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 14 − T 9 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 10 − T 9 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ] = 0 5 ( 50 °C − T 9 ) + 125 ( T 8 − T 9 ) + 5 ( T 14 − T 9 ) + 125 ( T 10 − T 9 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 10 is calculated as, k Δ y ( T 4 − T 10 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 9 − T 10 ) Δ y + k Δ y ( T 15 − T 10 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 11 − T 10 ) Δ y = 0 ( 25 W / m ⋅ K ) [ ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 50 °C − T 10 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 9 − T 10 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 15 − T 10 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 11 − T 10 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ] = 0 5 ( 50 °C − T 10 ) + 125 ( T 9 − T 10 ) + 5 ( T 15 − T 10 ) + 125 ( T 11 − T 10 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 11 is calculated as, k Δ y ( T 5 − T 11 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 10 − T 11 ) Δ y + h Δ s ( T ∞ − T 11 ) = 0 ( 25 W / m ⋅ K ) [ ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 50 °C − T 11 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 10 − T 11 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 50 W / m 2 ⋅ K ) ( 10.2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 20 °C − T 11 ) ] = 0 5 ( 50 °C − T 11 ) + 125 ( T 10 − T 11 ) + 0.51 ( 20 °C − T 11 ) = 0 The finite difference equation at the node 12 is calculated as, k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 1 − T 7 ) Δ x + k Δ x ( T 8 − T 7 ) Δ y + k ( Δ y 2 ) ( T 12 − T 7 ) Δ x = 0 ( 25 W / m ⋅ K ) [ ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm 2 ) ( T 7 − T 12 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) + ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( T 13 − T 12 ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ( 2 mm × 1 m 1000 mm 2 ) ( T 16 − T 12 ) ( 10 mm × 1 m 1000 mm ) ] = 0 2.5 ( T 7 − T 12 ) + 125 ( T 13 − T 12 ) + 2

6th Edition

ISBN: 9780470501962

Author: Frank P. Incropera, David P. DeWitt, Theodore L. Bergman, Adrienne S. Lavine

Publisher: Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

See similar textbooks

Videos

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 4.66P

To determine

The efficiency of the fin ηf and compare the fin efficiency with the reported in Figure 3.19 .

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Chapter 4, Problem 4.65P

Chapter 4, Problem 4.67P

Students have asked these similar questions

Qu 5 Determine the carburizing time necessary to achieve a carbon concentration of 0.30 wt% at a position 4 mm into an iron carbon alloy that initially contains 0.10 wt% C. The surface concentration is to be maintained at 0.90 wt% C, and the treatment is to be conducted at 1100°C. Use the data for the diffusion of carbon into y-iron: Do = 2.3 x10-5 m2/s and Qd = 148,000 J/mol. Express your answer in hours to three significant figures. show all work step by step problems formula material science

(Read Question)

In figure A, the homogeneous rod of constant cross section is attached to unyielding supports. In figure B, a homogeneous bar with a cross-sectional area of 600 mm2 is attached to rigid supports. The bar carries the axial loads P1 = 20 kN and P2 = 60 kN, as shown.1. In figure A, derive the expression that calculates the reaction R1 in terms of P, and the given dimensions.2. In figure B, calculate the reaction (kN) at A.3. In figure B, calculate the maximum axial stress (MPa) in the rod.

Chapter 4 Solutions

Introduction to Heat Transfer

Ch. 4 - In the method of separation of variables (Section...Ch. 4 - A two-dimensional rectangular plate is subjected...Ch. 4 - Consider the two-dimensional rectangular plate...Ch. 4 - A two-dimensional rectangular plate is subjected...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.5P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.6P Ch. 4 - Free convection heat transfer is sometimes...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.8P Ch. 4 - Radioactive wastes are temporarily stored in a...Ch. 4 - Based on the dimensionless conduction heat rates...

Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.11P Ch. 4 - A two-dimensional object is subjected to...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.13P Ch. 4 - Two parallel pipelines spaced 0.5 m apart are...Ch. 4 - A small water droplet of diameter D=100m and...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.16P Ch. 4 - Pressurized steam at 450 K flows through a long,...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.19P Ch. 4 - A furnace of cubical shape, with external...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.21P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.22P Ch. 4 - A pipeline, used for the transport of crude oil,...Ch. 4 - A long power transmission cable is buried at a...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.25P Ch. 4 - A cubical glass melting furnace has exterior...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.27P Ch. 4 - An aluminum heat sink k=240W/mK, used to coolan...Ch. 4 - Hot water is transported from a cogeneration power...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.30P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.31P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.32P Ch. 4 - An igloo is built in the shape of a hemisphere,...Ch. 4 - Consider the thin integrated circuit (chip) of...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.35P Ch. 4 - The elemental unit of an air heater consists of a...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.37P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.38P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.39P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.40P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.41P Ch. 4 - Determine expressions for...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.43P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.44P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.45P Ch. 4 - Derive the nodal finite-difference equations for...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.47P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.48P Ch. 4 - Consider a one-dimensional fin of uniform...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.50P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.52P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.53P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.54P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.55P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.56P Ch. 4 - Steady-state temperatures at selected nodal points...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.58P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.60P Ch. 4 - The steady-state temperatures C associated with...Ch. 4 - A steady-state, finite-difference analysis has...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.64P Ch. 4 - Consider a long bar of square cross section (0.8 m...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.66P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.67P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.68P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.69P Ch. 4 - Consider Problem 4.69. An engineer desires to...Ch. 4 - Consider using the experimental methodology of...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.72P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.73P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.74P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.75P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.76P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.77P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.78P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.79P Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.80P Ch. 4 - Spheres A and B arc initially at 800 K, and they...Ch. 4 - Spheres of 40-mm diameter heated to a uniform...Ch. 4 - To determine which parts of a spiders brain are...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4.84P

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

The efficiency of the fin η f and compare the fin efficiency with the reported in Figure 3.19 .

Solution Summary: The author compares the fin efficiency with the reported in Figure 3.19.

Videos

The efficiency of the fin ηf and compare the fin efficiency with the reported in Figure 3.19 .

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 4 Solutions