
Concept explainers
a)
To determine: The average cycle time for each operation.
Introduction: The amount of the dependency on human effort by an organization in terms of achieving its goals is given by the work design. It is directly linked to the productivity of an organization where good work design helps in achieving high productivity.
a)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Observation (minutes per cycle) | |||||||
Element | Performance rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
1 | 90 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
2 | 85 | 1.5 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.52 |
3 | 110 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8 |
4 | 100 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 1.26 |
Calculation of average time per cycle:
Observation (minutes per cycle) | |||||||
Performance rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Average time per cycle |
90 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.46 |
85 | 1.5 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.505 |
110 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8 | 0.83 |
100 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 1.156667 |
Excel worksheet:
Average time per cycle is calculated by taking average of all cycle in each element which is average of 0.44, 0.5, 0.43, 0.45, 0.48 and 0.46 which gives 0.46 as average time per cycle for element 1 and similar method follows for element 2, 3 and 4.
b)
To determine: The normal time for the operation.
b)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Observation (minutes per cycle) | |||||||
Element | Performance rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
1 | 90 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
2 | 85 | 1.5 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.52 |
3 | 110 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8 |
4 | 100 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 1.26 |
Formula:
Calculation of normal time:
Observation (minutes per cycle) | |||||||||
Element | Performance rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Average time per cycle | NT |
1 | 0.9 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.414 |
2 | 0.85 | 1.5 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.505 | 1.27925 |
3 | 1.1 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8 | 0.83 | 0.913 |
4 | 1 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 1.156666667 | 1.156667 |
Excel worksheet:
Normal time is calculated by multiplying observed timing, 0.46 and performance rating, 0.9 which yields 0.414 minutes for element 1, 2, 3 and 4.
c)
To determine: The standard time for the operation.
c)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Observation (minutes per cycle) | |||||||
Element | Performance rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
1 | 90 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
2 | 85 | 1.5 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.52 |
3 | 110 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8 |
4 | 100 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 1.26 |
Formula:
Calculation of standard time:
Allowance factor is calculated by dividing 1 with difference of 1 and 0.15 which yields 1.15.
Observation (minutes per cycle) | |||||||||||
Element | Performance rating | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Average time per cycle | NT | Afjob | ST |
1 | 0.9 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.414 | 1.15 | 0.4761 |
2 | 0.85 | 1.5 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.505 | 1.27925 | 1.15 | 1.471138 |
3 | 1.1 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.8 | 0.83 | 0.913 | 1.15 | 1.04995 |
4 | 1 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 1.157 | 1.157 | 1.15 | 1.330167 |
Excel worksheet:
Standard time for the operation is calculated by multiplying normal time of 0.414 minutes with allowance factor of 1.15 which gives 0.4761 minutes for element 1 and same procedure goes with element 2, 3 and 4.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Operations Management
- How does rework hurt a process? Give examples on how rework can hurt a process. Please provide a referencearrow_forwardHow does rework hurt a process? Give examples on how rework can hurt a process. Please provide a referencearrow_forwardWhat the different between a near miss and hazard 1. movement and contact 2. Contact 3. movementarrow_forward
- The fixed and variable costs for three potential manufacturing plant sites for a rattan chair weaver are shown: Site Fixed Cost Per Year Variable Cost per Unit 1 $700 $12.00 2 $1,000 $7.00 $2,200 $5.00 a) After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 1 is best below After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 2 is best between After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 3 is best above b) If the demand is 590 units, then the best location for the potent 3 units. and units. 600 0 60 units. g plant isarrow_forwardRefer to Table S6.1 - Factors for Computing Control Chart Limits (3 sigma) for this problem. Sampling 4 pieces of precision-cut wire (to be used in computer assembly) every hour for the past 24 hours has produced the following results: Hour R Hour X R Hour X R Hour X R 1 3.25" 0.71" 7 3.15" 0.58" 13 3.11" 0.85" 19 4.51" 1.56" 2 3.20 1.18 8 2.65 1.08 14 2.83 1.31 20 2.79 1.14 3 3.12 1.38 9 15 4. 3.39 1.31 10 5 2.97 1.17 6 2.76 0.32 3.02 0.71 3.12 1.01 2.75 1.33 16 2.74 0.50 22 11 2.73 1.17 17 2.76 1.43 23 12 2.87 0.45 18 2.64 1.24 21 2.75 1.03 3.18 0.46 2.94 1.53 24 2.54 0.97 Based on the sampling done, the control limits for 3-sigma x chart are (round all intermediate calculations to three decimal places before proceeding with further calculations): Upper Control Limit (UCL) = inches (round your response to three decimal places). Lower Control Limit (LCL) = inches (round your response to three decimal places). Based on the x-chart, the wire cutting process has been The control limits…arrow_forwardChoose a specific cars company. E.g Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Honda, Ford, Audi, Tesla Define a list of required machinery, equipment, workstations, offices, rest areas, materials, etc. Develop and define the location of machinery, equipment, workstations, offices, rest areas, materials. Make the distribution in the manufacturing facility the most efficient way possible. Develop a process distribution for one specific product. Explain why you consider this is the most efficient distribution for this specific manufacturing facility. demonstrate the benefits of optimizing a production line with the best distribution of its equipment and spaces. To be more productive and profitable.arrow_forward
- Provide a Synposis of the Articlearrow_forwardThe goal of understanding personality in negotiation is to better predict behavior, such as the counterparty's acceptance or rejection of a negotiation offer. One investigation used acoustic and visual cues to predict the likely behavior of a counterparty to a proposal. The best visual cue predictor of the counterparty (55%) was whether they _____. A. tilted their head B. had their arms and legs crossed C. steepled their fingers D. tapped a penarrow_forwardWomen who ask for what they want in negotiation are less well-liked than women who do not self-advocate. However, nonassertive, other-advocating women suffer a leadership backlash and are regarded as less competent because their behavior is regarded to be _____ and _____. A. high-negative feminine; low-positive masculine B. high-positive feminine; high-positive masculine C. high-negative masculine; low-negative feminine D. low-positive masculine; low-positive femininearrow_forward
- There are five most recognized personality traits that can reliably be measured and predict negotiator behavior in a number of different situations. All of the following are one of those "Big 5" personality traits except _____. A. conscientiousness B. introversion C. agreeableness D. openness to experiencearrow_forwardWith regard to reputation in negotiation, negotiators who use adversarial, stubborn, and ethically questionable behavior often have the effect of _____. A. improving their business relationships B. decreasing their effectiveness as a negotiator C. improving their business relationships D. decreasing their group statusarrow_forwardWhen it comes to assertiveness, there is only a modest link between negotiators' self-views and how the counterparty sees them. Many negotiators come away from a negotiation thinking they came on too strong with the counterparty. The _____ refers to the fact that negotiators believe they are coming on too strong with the counterparty, but they actually are not. A. Collective trap illusion B. Attribution error C. Aggressive anchoring bias D. Line-crossing illusionarrow_forward
- Management, Loose-Leaf VersionManagementISBN:9781305969308Author:Richard L. DaftPublisher:South-Western College PubUnderstanding Management (MindTap Course List)ManagementISBN:9781305502215Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy MarcicPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage LearningFoundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...MarketingISBN:9781285193946Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning




