Are these proportions prevalence rates, incidence rates, or neither? Do the results in this problem give insight into why the Hispanic paradox occurs (do Hispanic men truly have lower risk of CHD as government surveys would indicate)? Why or why not? Given other surveys over the same time period among NHW in these counties, the researchers expected that the comparable rate of CHD for NHW would be 8%. Another important parameter in the epidemiology of CHD is the case-fatality rate (the proportion of people who die among those who have a heart attack). Among the 100 CHD cases ascertained among Hispanics, 50 were fatal. 3.102 What is the expected proportion of Hispanic men who will be identified by health surveys as having a previous heart attack in the past 5 years (who are by definition survivors) if we assume that the proportion of men with more than one nonfatal heart attack is negligible? What is the comparable proportion for NHW men if the expected case-fatality rate is 20% among NHW men with CHD?
Are these proportions prevalence rates, incidence rates, or neither? Do the results in this problem give insight into why the Hispanic paradox occurs (do Hispanic men truly have lower risk of CHD as government surveys would indicate)? Why or why not? Given other surveys over the same time period among NHW in these counties, the researchers expected that the comparable rate of CHD for NHW would be 8%. Another important parameter in the epidemiology of CHD is the case-fatality rate (the proportion of people who die among those who have a heart attack). Among the 100 CHD cases ascertained among Hispanics, 50 were fatal. 3.102 What is the expected proportion of Hispanic men who will be identified by health surveys as having a previous heart attack in the past 5 years (who are by definition survivors) if we assume that the proportion of men with more than one nonfatal heart attack is negligible? What is the comparable proportion for NHW men if the expected case-fatality rate is 20% among NHW men with CHD?
Are these proportions prevalence rates, incidence rates, or neither? Do the results in this problem give insight into why the Hispanic paradox occurs (do Hispanic men truly have lower risk of CHD as government surveys would indicate)? Why or why not? Given other surveys over the same time period among NHW in these counties, the researchers expected that the comparable rate of CHD for NHW would be 8%.
Another important parameter in the epidemiology of CHD is the case-fatality rate (the proportion of people who die among those who have a heart attack). Among the 100 CHD cases ascertained among Hispanics, 50 were fatal.
3.102 What is the expected proportion of Hispanic men who will be identified by health surveys as having a previous heart attack in the past 5 years (who are by definition survivors) if we assume that the proportion of men with more than one nonfatal heart attack is negligible? What is the comparable proportion for NHW men if the expected case-fatality rate is 20% among NHW men with CHD?
NC Current Students - North Ce X | NC Canvas Login Links - North ( X
Final Exam Comprehensive x Cengage Learning
x
WASTAT - Final Exam - STAT
→
C
webassign.net/web/Student/Assignment-Responses/submit?dep=36055360&tags=autosave#question3659890_9
Part (b)
Draw a scatter plot of the ordered pairs.
N
Life
Expectancy
Life
Expectancy
80
70
600
50
40
30
20
10
Year of
1950
1970 1990
2010 Birth
O
Life
Expectancy
Part (c)
800
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
1950
1970 1990
W
ALT
林
$
#
4
R
J7
Year of
2010 Birth
F6
4+
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Year of
1950 1970 1990
2010 Birth
Life
Expectancy
Ox
800
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Year of
1950 1970 1990 2010 Birth
hp
P.B.
KA
&
7
80
% 5
H
A
B
F10
711
N
M
K
744
PRT SC
ALT
CTRL
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.