Concept explainers
To find:
The explanation is given.
Given information
In this case, we start by supposing that v2 is a rational number. Thus, there will exist integer p and q (where q is non-zero) such that
Now, squaring both sides, it gives
Note that the right-hand side of the equation is multiplied by 2, which means that the left-hand side is a multiple of 2. So, it can be said that p2 is a multiple of 2. This further means that p itself must be a multiple of 2, as when a prime number is a factor of a number, let's say, m2, it is also a factor of m. Thus, we can assume that,
p=2m, m∈Z [Set of Integers]
⇒ (2m)2= 2q2 [From (1)]
⇒ 4m2=2q2
⇒ q2=2m2
Now, the right-hand side is a multiple of 2 again, which means that the left-hand side is a multiple of 2, which further means that q is a multiple of 2, i.e., q = 2n, where n ∈ Z. We have thus shown that both p and q are multiples of 2. But is that possible? This can only mean one thing: our original assumption of assuming v2 as
Thus, v2 does not have a rational representation v2 is irrational.
Chapter 2 Solutions
PRECALCULUS:GRAPHICAL,...-NASTA ED.
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781285741550Author:James StewartPublisher:Cengage LearningThomas' Calculus (14th Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134438986Author:Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. WeirPublisher:PEARSONCalculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134763644Author:William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric SchulzPublisher:PEARSON
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781319050740Author:Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert FranzosaPublisher:W. H. FreemanCalculus: Early Transcendental FunctionsCalculusISBN:9781337552516Author:Ron Larson, Bruce H. EdwardsPublisher:Cengage Learning