Concept explainers
One way to determine the number of species on Earth might be to simply count them. You could comb the scientific literature to find all the species that scientists have discovered and named, and then tally up the total number. One attempt to do just that, the Catalogue of Life project, has compiled an online searchable database that listed 1,612,941 species as of 2015. But even the Catalogue of Life can’t tell you how many species are on Earth.
Why doesn’t counting work? Because most of the planet’s species remain undiscovered. Relatively few scientists axe engaged in the search for new species, and nearly all undiscovered species are small and inconspicuous, or live in poorly explored habitats such as the floor of the ocean or the topmost branches of tropical rain forests. So no one knows the actual number of species on Earth. But biologists agree that the number must be much higher than the number of named species. A commonly held view is that the actual number is close to 8.7 million, the number estimated by a recent analysts that used sophisticated statistical methods to extrapolate past trends in species discovery.
How Many Species Inhabit the Planet?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 17 Solutions
Biology: Life on Earth with Physiology (11th Edition)
- Originally, the main task of taxonomists was to discover new species and give them unique names. In a natural system of classification, they must also figure out the evolutionary relationships of the species they discover. Which do you think is more difficult: the original task or the modern one? Describe some of the reasons why it is more difficult.arrow_forwardTwo biologists are arguing at a conference. One says that the Biological Species Concept (BSC) is superior. Her colleague argues that a different species concept is needed. Which of the following claims of the biologist are true and which are false? 1. The BSC potentially would work for all multicellular organisms. 2. A Morphological Species Concept would work better for cryptic species than the BSC. 3. If two populations of snails are separated by a huge distance, they cannot mate. This means the BSC cannot apply to them.arrow_forwardStudy the diagrams below. The diagrams represent four possible phylogenetic trees showing the relationship between the four species: M, L, S, and R. B A M LS R M LR +d \t R SML RM S tota -444 What is the plausible explanation for the appearance of autapomorphic character c in species L and S of tree A although they do not share a most recent common ancestor?arrow_forward
- Scientists use various methods to determine how closely two species are related. One method is to compare their physical features, and another is to compare their DNA. Can scientists also use similarities in the embyros of two animal species to help determine how closely they are related? No, comparing embryos of organisms does not help determine how closely two species are related. Scientists can obtain the same information comparing adult organisms No, comparing embryos of organisms does not help determine how closely two species are related. The embryos change too much as they grow into adult organisms Yes, comparing embryos is a useful way of determining how closely two species are related. There may be important similarities in the features of the embryos, even when the adults look very different. Yes, it is sometimes useful to compare embryos, but only when the adults are very similararrow_forwardBelow is a phylogenetic tree. Which of the following statements is correct? Species C and D are called sibling taxa because both are derived from the same parent species H. Species F is more related to species K than species D is. Species A, B, and D share a common ancestor of species I. All species shown are currently with us. All of the abovearrow_forwardIn the 18th century, Carl Linnaeus published a system for classifying living things, which has been developed into the modern classification system. Recently the classification system of life was changed to include not five but six kingdoms, as well as three domains. Earlier classification attempts were based mostly on structural features. Classification of many species, old and new, continues to be hotly disputed as scientists find new information or interpret facts in new ways. Now, DNA technology has allowed scientists to re-examine the relationships between organisms to refine the classification system. The Kingdom Monera in the old classification system included all bacteria. What two kingdoms now encompass prokaryotic organisms? Bacteria and archaea Eubacteria and archaea Bacteria and archaebacteria Eubacteria and archaebacteriaarrow_forward
- Use the DNA-DNA hybridization data from species A, B, C, D, and E showing the % difference in DNA between each species to answer the question that follows: D E C Species B A 4 3 3 2 X 4 3 3 B X 2 4 1 C 3 X 3 4 X D 3 1 3 X 4 E 4 4 4 23. Which of the following phylogenetic trees correctly illustrates the relationships between species A, B, C, D, and E? (assume that the letters run in sequence A-B-C-D-E at the ends of the branches) a. b. C. ABCDE ABCDE A B C D E V NY VV ABCDE 30+30+30+30)arrow_forwardUsing the graph on nucleotides answer the phylogeny question. I'm confused about which tree would match better. The top phylogenetic tree seems correct, but it doesn't match the graph. I feel the bottom phylogenetic tree matches the graph. I'm not sure can anyone explain which would be correct?arrow_forwardNext fill out the following table noting how many derived traits are shared for each pair of ingroup species. Species A Species B Species C Species D Species E Species F Species A Species B X X Species C X X X Species D X Species E X X Species F X X X X Use the above matrix to draw a cladogram depicting the phylogenetic relationships among all seven species. Start by grouping the pairs that have the most shared derived traits and then linking groups together. This is difficult to describe so look at the example matrix and cladogram below and then just give it a try, and ask for help if you get stuck. We will go through this as a group before lab is over to make sure everyone understands. Look at the hypothetical example first. Phylogenetic Systematics Page 5 Example Matrix Of Shared Derived Traits: Species Species Species Species A В C D Species A Species B Species C Species D 1 1 3 X Building a cladogram from above matrix: Step 1. Species C and D share the most derived traits so link…arrow_forward
- Suppose a new monkey species, Species A, has just been discovered. You are a primatologist, and you are trying to determine its phylogenetic position. You are sure its closest relatives are Species B and Species C, but you want to know which one it is more closely related to or if it is equally closely related to both. You are using Species D, a more distant relative, as the outgroup. You have come up with a list of ten characters you think will be useful in resolving this phylogeny, and you have determined the character state of each species for each character. The character states are: (in image below) Estimate the phylogeny of these taxa by plotting the changes on each of the three possible phylogenies for species A, B, and C and determining which tree requires the fewest evolutionary changes. HINT: First, review the carnivorans problem in Section 4.3 of the Zimmer and Emlen textbook. To solve the above problem, assume the outgroup has the ancestral character state for each…arrow_forwardWhich of the following is FALSE regarding phylogenetic trees? 1) The branch lengths on the tree are scaled to molecular (DNA) changes and/or time. 2)Phylogenetic trees have shown us that there is much more bacterial diversity compared to eukaryotes. 3) Phylogenetic trees show the evolutionary relatedness of different organisms. 4). The branch lengths on the tree depict abiotic and biotic factors affecting speciation.arrow_forwardScientists classify living things in order to organize the astonishing diversity of life on Earth. Modern scientists base their classifications mainly on molecular similarities. They group together organisms that have similar proteins and DNA. Molecular similarities show that organisms are related. In other words, they are descendants of a common ancestor in the past. As we said earlier in our discussion, there are species that needs to be named and some are to be discovered. However, with the current environmental situation we have at the present (pollution, exploitation of resources, forest fires, and others), these species that are yet to be identified are being endangered and at the verge of extinction. As a matter of fact, the University of Turku reported last July 1, 2020 that there are 15 million estimated different species living in our planet but 2 million of them are currently known to science. Discovering these remaining species is important for them to be protected. Also,…arrow_forward
- Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSONBiology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStaxAnatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
- Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyLaboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education