ORGANIC CHEMISTRY (LL)-PACKAGE
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY (LL)-PACKAGE
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781319316389
Author: VOLLHARDT
Publisher: MAC HIGHER
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 8, Problem 41P
Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:Compound that is intended for synthesis by student after aqueous workup should be given and the reason behind the unexpected formation of tertiary alcohol and the manner it is formed should be given.

Concept introduction:Grignard reagents are alkyl magnesium halides obtained from the treatment of haloalkane with magnesium in the presence of dried ether conditions. These reagents are useful precursors for the quick synthesis of a variety of organic compounds For example, the reaction of the Grignard reagent with aldehyde or ketone generates alcohol as illustrated below.

  ORGANIC CHEMISTRY (LL)-PACKAGE, Chapter 8, Problem 41P , additional homework tip  1

Methyl bromide reacts with magnesium ether to give Grignard reagent. This Grignard methylmagnsium bromide on treatment with formaldehyde gives corresponding alcohol. The mechanistic pathway for the latter reaction is as follows:

  ORGANIC CHEMISTRY (LL)-PACKAGE, Chapter 8, Problem 41P , additional homework tip  2

The polar carbonyl bond breaks and the polar Grignard reagent attack at electron-deficient carbon. Finally with the hydrolysis and work up the alcohol is formed.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
compared t-critical with t-calculated and 95% confidence interval to answer this question
Comparing two means. Horvat and co-workers used atomic absorption spectroscopy to determine the concentration of Hg in coal fly ash. Of particular interest to the authors was developing an appropriate procedure for digesting samples and releasing the Hg for analysis. As part of their study they tested several reagents for digesting samples. Their results using HNO3 and using a 1+3 mixture of HNO3 and HCl are shown here. All concentrations are given as ppb Hg sample.   HNO3: 161, 165, 160, 167, 166 1+3 HNO3–HCl: 159, 145, 140, 147, 143, 156   Determine whether there is a significant difference between these methods at the 95% confidence interval.
Comparison of experimental data to “known” value. Monna and co-workers used radioactive isotopes to date sediments from lakes and estuaries.21 To verify this method they analyzed a 208Po standard known to have an activity of 77.5 decays/min, obtaining the following results.   77.09, 75.37, 72.42, 76.84, 77.84, 76.69, 78.03, 74.96, 77.54, 76.09, 81.12, 75.75   Do the results differ from the expected results at the 95% confidence interval?
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305580350
Author:William H. Brown, Brent L. Iverson, Eric Anslyn, Christopher S. Foote
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Chemistry: The Molecular Science
Chemistry
ISBN:9781285199047
Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. Stanitski
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Introduction to General, Organic and Biochemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781285869759
Author:Frederick A. Bettelheim, William H. Brown, Mary K. Campbell, Shawn O. Farrell, Omar Torres
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Pushing Electrons
Chemistry
ISBN:9781133951889
Author:Weeks, Daniel P.
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079373
Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305080485
Author:John E. McMurry
Publisher:Cengage Learning