Concept explainers
The Lubbock plant of Morril’s Small Motor Division produces a major subassembly for a 6.0 horsepower motor for lawnmowers. The plant uses a
During the year, the Lubbock plant had the following actual production activity:
- a. Production of subassemblies totaled 50,000 units.
- b. A total of 260,000 pounds of raw materials was purchased at $4.70 per pound.
- c. There were 60,000 pounds of raw materials in beginning inventory (carried at $5 per lb.) There was no ending inventory.
- d. The company used 82,000 direct labor hours at a total cost of $1,066,000.
The Lubbock plant’s practical activity is 60,000 units per year. Standard
Required:
- 1. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Compute the materials price and usage variances. Of the two materials variances, which is viewed as the more controllable? To whom would you assign responsibility for the usage variance in this case? Explain.
- 2. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Compute the labor rate and efficiency variances. Who is usually responsible for the labor efficiency variance? What are some possible causes for this variance?
- 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Assume that the purchasing agent for the small motors plant purchased a lower-quality raw material from a new supplier. Would you recommend that the plant continue to use this cheaper raw material? If so, what standards would likely need revision to reflect this decision? Assume that the end products quality is not significantly affected.
- 4. Prepare all possible
journal entries.
1.
Calculate the value of material price variance and material usage variance. Identify which of the material variance is most controllable. Also, identify to whom the responsibility of usage variance is given and give reason.
Explanation of Solution
Variance:
The amount obtained when actual cost is deducted from budgeted cost is known as variance. Variance is calculated to find whether the cost is over applied or under applied.
Use the following formula to calculate material price variance:
Substitute $4.70 for actual price, $5.00 for standard price and 260,000 for actual quantity in the above formula.
Therefore, the material price variance is $78,000(F).
Use the following formula to calculate material usage variance:
Substitute 320,000 units for actual quantity, 300,000 units for standard quantity and $5 for standard price in the above formula.
Therefore, the material usage variance is $100,000(U).
According to the above calculations, material usage variance is more controllable because prices of the material depend upon the market situation which is not controllable. The responsibility of this variance should be assigned to the purchase department. The reason for the extra usage is poor quality material purchased as they are priced lower.
Working Note:
1. Calculation of standard quantity:
2.
Calculate the value of labor rate variance and labor efficiency variance. Identify the person who is responsible for the labor efficiency variance. Also, explain the causes of this variance.
Explanation of Solution
Use the following formula to calculate labor rate variance:
Substitute $13 for actual rate, $12 for standard rate, 82,000 hours for actual hours in the above formula.
Therefore, the labor rate variance is $82,000(U).
Use the following formula to calculate labor efficiency variance:
Substitute 82,000 hours for actual hours, 80,000 hours for standard hours and $12 for standard rate in the above formula.
Therefore, the labor efficiency variance is $24,000(U).
The production department is responsible for the labor efficiency variance. In the given case, use of poor quality material could have affected efficiency. Other possible causes of the variance could be lack of demand as demand of the product is less as compared to the expected demand, poor supervision , lack of proper training and lack of experience.
Working Note:
1. Calculation of standard hours:
3.
Identify whether an individual would recommend using the cheaper raw material. If, yes then provide standards that should be used in the decision making.
Explanation of Solution
The variances which are affected by the poor quality material is given below:
Serial Number | Variances |
Amount ($) |
1. | Material price variance | 78,000(F) |
2. | Material usage variance | 100,000(U) |
3. | Labor efficiency variance | 24,000(U) |
Total | 46,000(U) |
Table (1)
If the outcome of the variances is very large due to the poor quality product, then company should not use this cheaper material.
4.
Pass necessary journal entries.
Explanation of Solution
Journal entry for purchase of raw material:
Date | Account Title and Explanation | Post Ref. |
Debit ($) |
Credit ($) |
Material | 1,300,000 | |||
Material price variance | 78,000 | |||
Accounts payable | 1,222,000 | |||
(To record purchase of raw material) |
Table (2)
- Material is an asset and it is increased by $1,300,000. Therefore, debit the material account with $1,300,000.
- The balance of material price variance is favorable and the favorable balance is always credited. Therefore, credit the material price variance with $78,000.
- Accounts payable is a liability and it is increased by $1,222,000. Therefore, credit the accounts payable account with $1,222,000.
Journal entry for issuance of raw material:
Date | Account Title and Explanation | Post Ref. |
Debit ($) |
Credit ($) |
Work in progress | 1,500,000 | |||
Material usage variance | 100,000 | |||
Materials | 1,600,000 | |||
(To record issuance of raw material) |
Table (3)
- Work in progress is an asset and it is increased by $1,500,000. Therefore, debit the work in progress account with $1,500,000.
- The balance of material usage variance is unfavorable and the unfavorable balance is always debited. Therefore, debit the material usage variance with $100,000.
- Material is an asset and it is decreased by $1,600,000. Therefore, credit the material account with $1,600,000.
Journal entry for addition of labor to work in progress:
Date | Account Title and Explanation | Post Ref. |
Debit ($) |
Credit ($) |
Work in progress | 960,000 | |||
Labor rate variance | 82,000 | |||
Labor efficiency variance | 24,000 | |||
Accrued payroll | 1,066,000 | |||
(To record labor rate and efficiency variance) |
Table (4)
- Work in progress is an asset and it is increased by $960,000. Therefore, debit the work in progress account with $960,000.
- The balance of labor rate variance is unfavorable and the unfavorable balance is always debited. Therefore, debit the labor rate variance with $82,000.
- The balance of labor efficiency variance is unfavorable and the unfavorable balance is always debited. Therefore, debit the labor efficiency variance with $24,000.
- Accrued payroll is a liability and it is increased by $1,066,000. Therefore, credit the accrued payroll account with $1,066,000.
Journal entry for the closing of variances to cost of goods sold:
Date | Account Title and Explanation | Post Ref. |
Debit ($) |
Credit ($) |
Cost of goods sold | 206,000 | |||
Material usage variance | 100,000 | |||
Labor rate variance | 82,000 | |||
Labor efficiency variance | 24,000 | |||
(To record closing of variances) |
Table (5)
- The balance of cost of goods sold account is increased by $206,000. Therefore, debit the cost of goods sold account with $206,000.
- The balance of material usage variance is transferred to cost of goods sold. Therefore, credit the material usage variance account with $100,000.
- The balance of labor rate variance is transferred to cost of goods sold. Therefore, credit the labor rate variance account with $82,000.
- The balance of labor efficiency variance is transferred to cost of goods sold. Therefore, credit the labor efficiency variance account with $24,000.
Journal entry for the closing of variances to cost of goods sold:
Date | Account Title and Explanation | Post Ref. |
Debit ($) |
Credit ($) |
Material price variance | 78,000 | |||
Cost of goods sold | 78,000 | |||
(To record closing of variances) |
Table (6)
- The balance of material price variance is transferred to cost of goods sold. Therefore, debit the material price variance account with $78,000.
- The balance of cost of goods sold account is decreased by $78,000. Therefore, credit the cost of goods sold account with $78,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Business Decision-Making
- Box Springs. Inc., makes two sizes of box springs: queen and king. The direct material for the queen is $35 per unit and $55 is used in direct labor, while the direct material for the king is $55 per unit, and the labor cost is $70 per unit. Box Springs estimates it will make 4,300 queens and 3,000 kings in the next year. It estimates the overhead for each cost pool and cost driver activities as follows: How much does each unit cost to manufacture?arrow_forwardPetrillo Company produces engine parts for large motors. The company uses a standard cost system for production costing and control. The standard cost sheet for one of its higher volume products (a valve) is as follows: During the year, Petrillo had the following activity related to valve production: a. Production of valves totaled 20,600 units. b. A total of 135,400 pounds of direct materials was purchased at 5.36 per pound. c. There were 10,000 pounds of direct materials in beginning inventory (carried at 5.40 per pound). There was no ending inventory. d. The company used 36,500 direct labor hours at a total cost of 656,270. e. Actual fixed overhead totaled 110,000. f. Actual variable overhead totaled 168,000. Petrillo produces all of its valves in a single plant. Normal activity is 20,000 units per year. Standard overhead rates are computed based on normal activity measured in standard direct labor hours. Required: 1. Compute the direct materials price and usage variances. 2. Compute the direct labor rate and efficiency variances. 3. Compute overhead variances using a two-variance analysis. 4. Compute overhead variances using a four-variance analysis. 5. Assume that the purchasing agent for the valve plant purchased a lower-quality direct material from a new supplier. Would you recommend that the company continue to use this cheaper direct material? If so, what standards would likely need revision to reflect this decision? Assume that the end products quality is not significantly affected. 6. Prepare all possible journal entries (assuming a four-variance analysis of overhead variances).arrow_forwardBox Springs, Inc., makes two sizes of box springs: twin and double. The direct material for the twin is $25 per unit and $40 s used in direct labor, while the direct material for the double is $40 per unit, and the labor cost is $50 per unit. Box Springs estimates it will make 5,000 twins and 9,000 doubles in the next year. It estimates the overhead for each cost pool and cost driver activities as follows: How much does each unit cost to manufacture?arrow_forward
- Brees, Inc., a manufacturer of golf carts, has just received an offer from a supplier to provide 2,600 units of a component used in its main product. The component is a track assembly that is currently produced internally. The supplier has offered to sell the track assembly for 66 per unit. Brees is currently using a traditional, unit-based costing system that assigns overhead to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. The estimated traditional full cost of producing the track assembly is as follows: Prior to making a decision, the companys CEO commissioned a special study to see whether there would be any decrease in the fixed overhead costs. The results of the study revealed the following: 3 setups1,160 each (The setups would be avoided, and total spending could be reduced by 1,160 per setup.) One half-time inspector is needed. The company already uses part-time inspectors hired through a temporary employment agency. The yearly cost of the part-time inspectors for the track assembly operation is 12,300 and could be totally avoided if the part were purchased. Engineering work: 470 hours, 45/hour. (Although the work decreases by 470 hours, the engineer assigned to the track assembly line also spends time on other products, and there would be no reduction in his salary.) 75 fewer material moves at 30 per move. Required: 1. Ignore the special study, and determine whether the track assembly should be produced internally or purchased from the supplier. 2. Now, using the special study data, repeat the analysis. 3. Discuss the qualitative factors that would affect the decision, including strategic implications. 4. After reviewing the special study, the controller made the following remark: This study ignores the additional activity demands that purchasing would cause. For example, although the demand for inspecting the part on the production floor decreases, we may need to inspect the incoming parts in the receiving area. Will we actually save any inspection costs? Is the controller right?arrow_forwardApril Industries employs a standard costing system in the manufacturing of its sole product, a park bench. They purchased 60,000 feet of raw material for $300,000, and it takes S feet of raw materials to produce one park bench. In August, the company produced 10,000 park benches. The standard cost for material output was $100,000, and there was an unfavorable direct materials quantity variance of $6,000. A. What is April Industries standard price for one unit of material? B. What was the total number of units of material used to produce the August output? C. What was the direct materials price variance for August?arrow_forwardWyandotte Company provided the following information for the last calendar year: During the year, direct materials purchases amounted to 256,900, direct labor cost was 176,000, and overhead cost was 308,400. There were 40,000 units produced. Required: 1. Calculate the total cost of direct materials used in production. 2. Calculate the cost of goods manufactured. Calculate the unit manufacturing cost. 3. Of the unit manufacturing cost calculated in Requirement 2, 6.62 is direct materials and 7.71 is overhead. What is the prime cost per unit? Conversion cost per unit?arrow_forward
- Carsen Company produces handcrafted pottery that uses two inputs: materials and labor. During the past quarter, 24,000 units were produced, requiring 96,000 pounds of materials and 48,000 hours of labor. An engineering efficiency study commissioned by the local university revealed that Carsen can produce the same 24,000 units of output using either of the following two combinations of inputs: The cost of materials is 8 per pound; the cost of labor is 12 per hour. Required: 1. Compute the output-input ratio for each input of Combination F1. Does this represent a productivity improvement over the current use of inputs? What is the total dollar value of the improvement? Classify this as a technical or an allocative efficiency improvement. 2. Compute the output-input ratio for each input of Combination F2. Does this represent a productivity improvement over the current use of inputs? Now, compare these ratios to those of Combination F1. What has happened? 3. Compute the cost of producing 24,000 units of output using Combination F1. Compare this cost to the cost using Combination F2. Does moving from Combination F1 to Combination F2 represent a productivity improvement? Explain.arrow_forwardStacks manufactures two different levels of hockey sticks: the Standard and the Slap Shot. The total overhead of $600,000 has traditionally been allocated by direct labor hours, with 400,000 hours for the Standard and 200.000 hours for the Slap Shot. After analyzing and assigning costs to two cost pools, it was determined that machine hours is estimated to have $450.000 of overhead, with 30,000 hours used on the Standard product and 15,000 hours used on the Slap Shot product. It was also estimated that the inspection cost pool would have $150,000 of overhead, with 25,000 hours for the Standard and 5,000 hours for the Slap Shot. What is the overhead rate per product, under traditional and under ABC costing?arrow_forwardPlata Company has identified the following overhead activities, costs, and activity drivers for the coming year: Plata produces two models of microwave ovens with the following activity demands: The companys normal activity is 21,000 machine hours. Calculate the total overhead cost that would be assigned to Model X using an activity-based costing system: a. 230,000 b. 240,000 c. 280,000 d. 190,000arrow_forward
- Business Specialty, Inc., manufactures two staplers: small and regular. The standard quantities of direct labor and direct materials per unit for the year are as follows: The standard price paid per pound of direct materials is 1.60. The standard rate for labor is 8.00. Overhead is applied on the basis of direct labor hours. A plantwide rate is used. Budgeted overhead for the year is as follows: The company expects to work 12,000 direct labor hours during the year; standard overhead rates are computed using this activity level. For every small stapler produced, the company produces two regular staplers. Actual operating data for the year are as follows: a. Units produced: small staplers, 35,000; regular staplers, 70,000. b. Direct materials purchased and used: 56,000 pounds at 1.5513,000 for the small stapler and 43,000 for the regular stapler. There were no beginning or ending direct materials inventories. c. Direct labor: 14,800 hours3,600 hours for the small stapler and 11,200 hours for the regular stapler. Total cost of direct labor: 114,700. d. Variable overhead: 607,500. e. Fixed overhead: 350,000. Required: 1. Prepare a standard cost sheet showing the unit cost for each product. 2. Compute the direct materials price and usage variances for each product. Prepare journal entries to record direct materials activity. 3. Compute the direct labor rate and efficiency variances for each product. Prepare journal entries to record direct labor activity. 4. Compute the variances for fixed and variable overhead. Prepare journal entries to record overhead activity. All variances are closed to Cost of Goods Sold. 5. Assume that you know only the total direct materials used for both products and the total direct labor hours used for both products. Can you compute the total direct materials and direct labor usage variances? Explain.arrow_forwardMazomanie Farm completed 20,000 units during the quarter and has 2,500 units still in process. The units are 100% complete with regard to materials and 55% complete with regard to conversion costs. What are the equivalent units for materials and conversion?arrow_forwardOakes Inc. manufactured 40,000 gallons of Mononate and 60,000 gallons of Beracyl in a joint production process, incurring 250,000 of joint costs. Oakes allocates joint costs based on the physical volume of each product produced. Mononate and Beracyl can each be sold at the split-off point in a semifinished state or, alternatively, processed further. Additional data about the two products are as follows: An assistant in the companys cost accounting department was overheard saying ...that when both joint and separable costs are considered, the firm has no business processing either product beyond the split-off point. The extra revenue is simply not worth the effort. Which of the following strategies should be recommended for Oakes?arrow_forward
- Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubFinancial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,