Physical Chemistry
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9781133958437
Author: Ball, David W. (david Warren), BAER, Tomas
Publisher: Wadsworth Cengage Learning,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 17.40E
Interpretation Introduction
Interpretation:
The validation of the statement that the equation 17.54 is observed by simplifying the expression immediately before it is to be stated.
Concept introduction:
The partition function of a system is given by the formula,
Where,
•
•
•
•
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Use the data and formula below to test the validity of the equation (7) for the two binary systems studied.
Write the orthonormality expression, using the Kronecker delta function.
solve the question provided in the image.
Chapter 17 Solutions
Physical Chemistry
Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.1ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.2ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.3ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.4ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.5ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.6ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.7ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.8ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.9ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.10E
Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.11ECh. 17 - If the ni values are all the same, a shorthand way...Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.13ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.14ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.15ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.16ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.17ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.18ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.19ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.20ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.21ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.22ECh. 17 - Explain why q is a constant for a given system at...Ch. 17 - What is the ratio of ground-state nickel atoms in...Ch. 17 - Ti3+ has the following electronic energy levels:...Ch. 17 - Using the fact that =1/kT, show that equations...Ch. 17 - A one-dimensional particle-in-a-box has a length...Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.28ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.29ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.30ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.31ECh. 17 - What is the value of q at absolute zero? Is it the...Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.33ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.34ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.35ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.36ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.37ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.38ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.39ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.40ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.41ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.42ECh. 17 - What change is there in the Sackur-Tetrode...Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.44ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.45ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.46ECh. 17 - Calculate the thermal de Broglie wavelength of He...Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.48ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.49ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.50ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.51ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.52ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.53ECh. 17 - Use equation 17.56 to determine the change in...Ch. 17 - For an electron that has a velocity of 0.01c where...Ch. 17 - Use the Sackur-Tetrode equation to derive the...Ch. 17 - Prob. 17.57ECh. 17 - Prob. 17.58E
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Using the fact that =1/kT, show that equations 17.29 and 17.30 are equivalent.arrow_forwardCan CV and Cp be easily defined using the natural variable expressions for dU and dH? Why or why not?arrow_forward*What type of system is best modeled by deterministic equations?* a) Chaotic systems b) Systems with noise c) Predictable systems d) Random systemsarrow_forward
- 5.10. If and gases were contained in a system such that the total pressure were , then the terms in equation would be equal to . True or false? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardUsing the Quasi-steady-state approximation prove the Michaelis-Menten equation.arrow_forwardI really need to know how to get to the expression for DeltaU using "the full differential", rather than just a formula, this is helpful to confirm answers but it doesn't answer the actual question on how to get to the expressions for DeltaU for the Van Der Waals version of the equation since you had to come up with it in an integral yourself. More help maybe?arrow_forward
- Which of the following functions are exact differentials? a dF=1xdx+1ydy b dF=1ydx+1xdy c dF=2x2y2dx+3x3y3dy d dF=2x2y3dx+2x3y2dy e dF=xndx+yndy,n= any integer f dF=(x3cosy)dx+(x3siny)dyarrow_forwardIt has been previously noted that the total time derivative of a functionof qi and t can be added to the Lagrangian without changing the equationof motion. What does such an addition do to the canonical momenta andthe Hamiltonian? Show that the equations of motion in terms of the newHamiltonian reduce the original Hamilton’s equations of motion.arrow_forwardEquation 4.19 says that (UV)S=p If we are considering the variation of U, the change in the change of the internal energy, we can write that as see the previous problem for an analogous argument ((U)V)S=p Show that this is entirely consistent with the first law of thermodynamics.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Physical ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781133958437Author:Ball, David W. (david Warren), BAER, TomasPublisher:Wadsworth Cengage Learning,Principles of Modern ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305079113Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. ButlerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Physical Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781133958437
Author:Ball, David W. (david Warren), BAER, Tomas
Publisher:Wadsworth Cengage Learning,
Principles of Modern Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079113
Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler
Publisher:Cengage Learning