Concept explainers
Workplace bullying and intention to leave. Workplace bullying has been shown to have a negative psychological effect on victims, often leading the victim to quit or resign. In Human Resource Management Journal (October 2008), researchers employed multiple regression to examine whether perceived organizational support (POS) would moderate the relationship between workplace bullying and victims’ intention to leave the firm. The dependent variable in the analysis, intention to leave (y), was measured on a quantitative scale. The two key independent variables in the study were bullying (ii, measured on a quantitative scale) and perceived organizational support {measured qualitatively as “low,” “neutral,” or “high”).
- a. Set up the dummy variables required to represent POS in the regression model.
- b. Write a model for E(y) as a
function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three parallel straight lines, one for each level of POS. - c. Write a model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three nonparallel straight lines, one for each level of POS.
- d. The researchers discovered that the effect of bullying on intention to leave was greater at the low level of POS than at the high level of POS. Which of the two models, parts b and c, support these findings?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 12 Solutions
Statistics for Business and Economics (13th Edition)
- Show that an interaction term of a dummy variable and a regressor changes the slope of a regression line..arrow_forwardC8. Research on social mobility, status, and educational attainment has provided convincing evidence on the relationship between parents' and children's socioeconomic achievement. For this exercise, refer to the scatterplot and regression output from a GSS 2018 subsample to describe the relationship between mother's education and respondent's education.arrow_forwardA researcher wants to understand the causal effect of schooling on wages. Suppose the research estimates a regression of wages on schooling, controlling for parental education, year of birth, and state of residence. 1. What is this research design called? What assumption does she have to make to interpret the coefficient on schooling as reflecting a causal effect? 2. What could possibly confound a causal interpretation of this relationship? She obtains funding to send college scholarships to different students. They can only get the funding if they enroll in college. She randomizes the amount that the students receive from $0 to $50k per year. She then measures their earnings at age 40. 3 The researcher first estimates the relationship between amount of scholarship and log earnings. log Y = 40123 + 0.0002scholarship Write a sentence that articulates what 0.0002 represents. 4 Write a sentence that articulates the causal interpretation of 0.0002. 5 What is this research design called?…arrow_forward
- An experiment was conducted into various phobias, by the department of Psychology at Lowlands University. One hundred subjects were shown pictures of things that typically induce fear (spiders, violence, extreme heights, bloody wounds etc). They were then asked how frightened they were. State whether or not the data is suitable for analysis using correlation and regression, and explain fully why you have reached that conclusion. Observation Not frightened A little frightened Frightened Terrified 1 Spiders 2 Zombies 3 Blood 4 House fire 5 Clowns 6 Vampires 7 Explosions 8 Surgeries 9 Exam rooms 10 Job centresarrow_forwardExplain why the predictor variable is useless as a predictor of the response variable if the slope of the population regression line is 0.arrow_forwardIt has been demonstrated that students with high self-esteem tend to have higher grades than students with low self-esteem. Does this relationship mean that higher self-esteem causes better academic performance? Does it mean that better academic performance causes higher self-esteem? Explain your answer, and identify the general problem that can preclude a cause-and-effect explanation.arrow_forward
- A researcher investigates the relationship between study habits and college achievement. College seniors were administered the Inventory of Study Habits Survey (X) to measure study habits and the College BASE (Y) was used to measure overall college achievement. The correlation between the study habits and achievement was found to be 0.784. The researcher concluded that students with higher scores on the Study Habits Survey will always have higher college achievement scores on the College BASE. Is the researcher's conclusion correct? Why or why not?arrow_forwardComputer programmers employed by a software developer were asked to participate in a monthlong training seminar. During the seminar, each participant was asked to record the number of hours spent in class preparation each week. After completing the seminar. the productivity level of each participant was measured. A positive linear statistical relationship between participants' productivity levels and time spent in class preparation was found. Based on the information (a) Identify the predictors and response variable Identify three alternative predictor variables that might cause both the employee productivity scores and the employee class participation times to increase (decrease) simultaneously. (b)arrow_forwardIf there is no significant correlation between the response and explanatory variables, would the slope of the regression line be (a) positive (b) negative (c) zero?arrow_forward
- Do test scores at pre-treatment differ from test scores at post-treatment? Note, this analysis should be conducted ignoring the treatment group they are in. Do male and female subjects differ on their pre-test score performance? Knowing the number of hours the student studied for the exam, can you predict their post-test scores? Is there a significant relationship between subject’s IQ and pre-test scores? Do the three treatments differ significantly from one another at pre-test? Do student IQ scores differ significantly from the population (μ = 100 & σ = 15)? Create your own research question based on the data. (All analyses are to be tested at α =.05, two tailed)arrow_forwardwo thousand (2,000) adults ages 50 to 80 years were recruited into a 10-year prospective cohort study which started in 1971. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of gender on death at the end of the study (died during the study period vs survived), controlling for age, years if smoking, and occupation. What is the most appropriate statistical analysis you would conduct to answer the research question? A. Multiple linear regression B. Survival analysisC. Multiple logistic regression.D. All of the abovearrow_forwardThe Core grade point is the eventual dependent variable in a regression analysis. Look at the correlations between all variables. Is multicollinearity likely to be a problem? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt