Table 2. Prepared and calculated percentages of degradants mixed with their correspondingdrug determined using Raman spectra. Spectral regions are indicated.Azaerythromycin A Norepinephrine 2,6-DimethylanilinePreparedCalculatedCalculatedCalculated%565-1220575-1560450-10505041.343.648.12022.124.620.61011.38.410.454.32.99.7 *0.80.27.3*R0.970.960.99RMSE4.093.801.171.550.0451.40InterceptLOD* Not included in the R', RMSE, Intercept and LOD calculations.4.650.1354.20Spectral analysis of the preparation andthe results are important ... The results thatwe obtained from the Raman spectrometerare in the above tables. Explain all thetables in detail and what does the abovetable represent and what is the relationshipbetween the tables???

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/85e61a6b-9490-4315-8026-602a0cdf67da.jpg

Table 2. Prepared and calculated percentages of degradants mixed with their corresponding drug determined using Raman spectra. Spectral regions are indicated. Azaerythromycin A Norepinephrine 2,6-Dimethylaniline Calculated Calculated Prepared % Calculated 565-1220 575-1560 450-1050 50 41.3 43.6 48.1 20 22.1 24.6 20.6 10 11.3 8.4 10.4 5 4.3 2.9 9.7 * 0.8 0.2 7.3* R 0.97 0.96 0.99 RMSE 4.09 3.80 1.17 1.55 0.045 Intercept LOD * Not included in the R', RMSE, Intercept and LOD calculations. 1.40 4.65 0.135 4.20 Spectral analysis of the preparation and the results are important ... The results that we obtained from the Raman spectrometer are in the above tables. Explain all the tables in detail and what does the above table represent and what is the relationship between the tables???

Table 2. Prepared and calculated percentages of degradants mixed with their corresponding drug determined using Raman spectra. Spectral regions are indicated. Azaerythromycin A Norepinephrine 2,6-Dimethylaniline Calculated Calculated Prepared % Calculated 565-1220 575-1560 450-1050 50 41.3 43.6 48.1 20 22.1 24.6 20.6 10 11.3 8.4 10.4 5 4.3 2.9 9.7 * 0.8 0.2 7.3* R 0.97 0.96 0.99 RMSE 4.09 3.80 1.17 1.55 0.045 Intercept LOD * Not included in the R', RMSE, Intercept and LOD calculations. 1.40 4.65 0.135 4.20 Spectral analysis of the preparation and the results are important ... The results that we obtained from the Raman spectrometer are in the above tables. Explain all the tables in detail and what does the above table represent and what is the relationship between the tables???

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

stering X tml?courseld=17811238&OpenVellumHMAC=b94d174c19a5844d71332d5a687205ef#10001 e to search
show-all-working-explaining-detailly-each-step. Answer should be typewritten using a computer keyboard
2. Determine the structures of the compounds that give rise to the following spectral data. Draw the structure, label the hydrogens and carbons, assign each peak in the ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra, and identify major functional group stretches in the IR. a. C4H8O2 IR 25 26 27 28 29 3 ¹H NMR Offset: 2.0 ppm 3.5 N 3800 3600 3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 8 BRI 4.5 6 2000 Wavelength (um) 5 5.5 1800 1600 Wavenumber (cm) 1400 1200 3 1000 4 8 (ppm) Peak Summary: 9.8 (broad s, 1H), 2.35 (t, 2H), 1.68 (sextet, 2H), 0.99, (t, 3H) 13C NMR: 177, 38, 18, 13 2 1.5 PPM 800 13 14 15 16 0 600
Identify the structure of the important fragments. Show the arrow pushing mechanism to form the significant fragments. Suggest possible structure based on MS and IR data. 2. MF C,H,O 27.0 1.5 28.0 1.1 100 29.0 1.0 38.0 1.2 39.0 3.7 50.0 8.6 51.0 21.2 80 51.5 1.1 52.0 5.5 53.0 1.2 54.0 1.0 55.0 1.1 61.0 1.1 60 62.0 2.5 63.0 5.7 65.0 1.1 74.0 5.3 75.0 4.7 40 76.0 5.1 77.0 35.7 78.0 26.1 79.0 1.7 89.0 1.2 91.0 2.5 20 101.0 1.5 102.0 8.9 103.0 54.5 104.0 27.4 105.0 3.5 131.0 100.0 132.0 74.8 133.0 7.3 25 50 75 100 125 150 m/z Relative Intensity
Use the NMR spectrum provided to calculate the percent trans isomer for the reduction of 4-t- butylcyclohexanone reaction outcome. Chemical shift values and associated integration values are provided in the table. Chemical Shift (ppm) 3.51 4.02 O 100% O 75.2% O 57.1% O 42.9% 11% Integration 1.33 1.00
Identify the structure of the important fragments. Show the arrow pushing mechanism to form the significant fragments. Suggest possible structure based on MS and IR data. 2. MF C₂H₂O 131(Base peak 27.9 1.5 28.0 1.1 100 3.M 1.60 38.A 1.7 30.0 3.7 50.0 51.0 21.2 80 1.1 52.0 5.5 53.0 1.2 54.0 1.0 55.9 1.1 61.A 1.1 62.8 2.5 63.9 5.7 65.0 1.1 M.H 14.4 16.0 5.1 77 77.0 51 91.0 101.0 102.0 103.0 184.8 185.0 131.0 132.0 141.4 Relative Intensity 40 20 Other 25 50 75 103 |||||||| 100 m/z ||||||| 125 132(M+) 133(M+1) 150 35.7 20.1 1./ 1.2 2.5 1.5 51.5 27.4 3.5 108.0 71.8
A student was trying to determine the identity of an unknown compound. The melting point of the compound was 117-118oC. The student narrowed the possible compound down to the following: Compound Melting Point Range acetanilide 113-115oC fluorene 114-116oC mandelic acid 120-122oC A second student, doing the same experiment as above, found that their melting point was 100-108oC. What is wrong with the student’s melting point? Propose two reasons why the melting point could be incorrect. View keyboard shortcuts
1. In both the starting material and product the chemical shift of the hydroxyl proton is approximately 13 ppm. Table 22.2 in your “Techniques in Organic Chemistry" textbook gives 4.0 - 8.0 ppm as the typical range for phenolic protons. Explain this apparent discrepancy. Hint: Think about the solvent the NMR spectrum was run in.….
[References] All ethyl esters of long-chain aliphatic acids (for example, ethyl tetradecanoate, C13H27COOCH₂CH3) show significant fragment ions at m/z 88, 73, and 45. Draw the structure of the ion that gives the m/z 88 peak. star 14
Peaks in the NMR spectrum for the product ester: report the center of a multiplet as the chemical shift, the integration (relative intensity), and the multiplicity (singlet, doublet, triplet) for each unique peak set.
Identify the structure of the important fragments. Show the arrow pushing mechanism to form the significant fragments. Suggest possible structure based on MS and IR data. 2. MF C₂H₂O 131(Base peak 27.0 1.5 28.0 100 1.0 38.8 30.0 3.7 50.0 8.G 21.2 80 1.1 52.0 5.5 52.0 1.2 54.0 1.0 55.0 1.1 61.A 1.1 60 62.A 2.5 63.9 5.7 1.2 65.0 M.M 1.1 16.8 5.1 40 77 77.0 35.7 78.0 20.1 19.0 1./ 51 01.0 2.5 20 101.0 1.5 102.0 8.9 54.5 133(M+1) 104. A 27.4 105.0 3.5 131.0 103.0 0 ttttm t www.t 132.0 74.8 141. 25 50 100 125 150 m/z Identify the structure of the important fragments. Show the arrow pushing mechanism to form the significant fragments. Suggest possible structure based on MS and IR data. 2. MF C₂H₂O IR KBr Disc LOD v wym 50 3000 15.00 1000 500 HAVENUE CRI Relative Intensity D 4000 3332 77 2744 64 3322 79 2716 74 3063 85 1677 4 3040 70 1627 14 3029 1606 49 2992 74 1587 55 2014 60 1676 47 1496 66 1450 34 1395 74 1329 74 1306 86 1295 52 1262 75 2008 1204 74 LJ 79 66 L150 55 LJ 26 9 LO73 58 LOOD…
Question 34 Which structure is in agreement with both of these IR and 'H NMR data? IR, cm-1 (intensity) – 2965 (strong), 1745 (strong), 1238 (strong) 'H NMR, ppm (splitting, #H): 0.94 (doublet, 6H), 1.93 (multiplet, 1H), 2.05 (singlet, 3H), 3.85 (doublet, 2H) A. с. D. A B. B.