An unpolarized beam of light is incident on a stack of ideal polarizing filters. The axis of the first filter is perpendicular to the axis of the last filter in the stack. Find the fraction by which the transmitted beam’s intensity is reduced in the three following cases. (a) Three filters are in the stack, each with its transmission axis at 45.0° relative to the preceding filter. (b) Four filters are in the stack, each with its transmission axis at 30.0° relative to the preceding filter. (c) Seven filters are in the stack, each with its transmission axis at 15.0° relative to the preceding filter. (d) Comment on comparing the answers to parts (a), (b), and (c).
(a)
Answer to Problem 38.48P
Explanation of Solution
Given info: The number of the polarizing filters is
Here,
When an unpolarized light is passed through a polarizing filter intensity is reduced to half. So after passing through the first polarizer the intensity of the light becomes half.
Here,
The angle between the transmission axis of second polarizer and the first polarizer is
Here,
The third polarizing filter and the second polarizing filter has the same
Therefore the final intensity after three polarizing filters is,
Substitute
Substitute
From equation (5), a general formula for the calculation of intensity when light is passed through
Here,
Substitute
Therefore the absorbed intensity is
Conclusion:
Therefore, the fraction by which the intensity is reduced is
(b)
Answer to Problem 38.48P
Explanation of Solution
Given info: The number of filters are
From equation (6) the formula to calculate when there are
Substitute
Therefore the absorbed intensity is
Conclusion:
Therefore, The fraction by which the intensity is reduced is
(c)
Answer to Problem 38.48P
Explanation of Solution
Given info: The number of filters are
From equation (6) the formula to calculate when there are
Substitute
Therefore the absorbed intensity is
Conclusion:
Therefore, the fraction by which the intensity is reduced is
(d)
Answer to Problem 38.48P
Explanation of Solution
From equation (7), (8) and (9), it is evident that, as the number of polarizing filters increased the fraction of absorbed was decreased. For the case of
Conclusion:
Therefore, the intensity of light can be increased by increasing the number of stacks of polarizing filters by decreasing the angle between their transmission axis.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 38 Solutions
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Technology Update (No access codes included)
- In an isothermal process, you are told that heat is being added to the system. Which of the following is not true? (a) The pressure of the gas is decreasing. (b) Work is being done on the system. (c) The average kinetic energy of the particles is remaining constant. (d) The volume of the gas is increasing. (e) Work is being done by the system.arrow_forwardNo chatgpt pls will upvotearrow_forward8.114 CALC A Variable-Mass Raindrop. In a rocket-propul- sion problem the mass is variable. Another such problem is a rain- drop falling through a cloud of small water droplets. Some of these small droplets adhere to the raindrop, thereby increasing its mass as it falls. The force on the raindrop is dp dv dm Fext = + dt dt dt = Suppose the mass of the raindrop depends on the distance x that it has fallen. Then m kx, where k is a constant, and dm/dt = kv. This gives, since Fext = mg, dv mg = m + v(kv) dt Or, dividing by k, dv xgx + v² dt This is a differential equation that has a solution of the form v = at, where a is the acceleration and is constant. Take the initial velocity of the raindrop to be zero. (a) Using the proposed solution for v, find the acceleration a. (b) Find the distance the raindrop has fallen in t = 3.00 s. (c) Given that k = 2.00 g/m, find the mass of the raindrop at t = 3.00 s. (For many more intriguing aspects of this problem, see K. S. Krane, American Journal of…arrow_forward
- 8.13 A 2.00-kg stone is sliding Figure E8.13 F (kN) to the right on a frictionless hori- zontal surface at 5.00 m/s when it is suddenly struck by an object that exerts a large horizontal force on it for a short period of 2.50 time. The graph in Fig. E8.13 shows the magnitude of this force as a function of time. (a) What impulse does this force exert on t (ms) 15.0 16.0 the stone? (b) Just after the force stops acting, find the magnitude and direction of the stone's velocity if the force acts (i) to the right or (ii) to the left.arrow_forwardPlease calculate the expectation value for E and the uncertainty in E for this wavefunction trapped in a simple harmonic oscillator potentialarrow_forwardIf an object that has a mass of 2m and moves with velocity v to the right collides with another mass of 1m that is moving with velocity v to the left, in which direction will the combined inelastic collision move?arrow_forward
- Please solve this questionarrow_forwardPlease solvearrow_forwardQuestions 68-70 Four hundred millilitres (mL) of a strong brine solution at room temperature was poured into a measuring cylinder (Figure 1). A piece of ice of mass 100 g was then gently placed in the brine solution and allowed to float freely (Figure 2). Changes in the surface level of the liquid in the cylinder were then observed until all the ice had melted. Assume that the densities of water, ice and the brine solution are 1000 kg m-3, 900 kg m3 and 1100 kg m3, respectively. 68 Figure 1 400 400 Figure 2 1m² = 1x10 mL After the ice was placed in the brine solution and before any of it had melted, the level of the brine solution was closest to 485 mL. B 490 mL. C 495 mL. Displaced volume by ice. D 500 mL. weight of ice 69 The level of the brine solution after all the ice had melted was A 490 mL B 495 mL D 1100kg/m² = 909 xious mis 70 Suppose water of the same volume and temperature had been used instead of the brine solution. In this case, by the time all the ice had melted, the…arrow_forward
- Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning