Concept explainers
Suppose the slit width in Figure 37.4 is made half as wide. Does the central bright fringe (a) become wider, (b) remain the same, or (c) become narrower?
Figure 37.4 (a) Geometry for analyzing the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of a single slit. (Drawing not to scale.) (b) Simulation of a single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction pattern.
Answer to Problem 38.1QQ
Explanation of Solution
Consider the figure given below.
Figure (1)
The condition for the central diffraction maximum is,
Here;
From the figure (1),
Here
From the trigonometry property, for very small angle,
Substitute
Substitute
For the case of central bright fringe, the order of the fringe is
Substitute
For
Rearrange the above equation for
Thus from above equation the central bright fringe width is inversely proportional to the slit width. Thus, if the slit width decreases or half of the initial value the width of central bight fringe increases.
Conclusion:
The width of the central bright fringe is inversely proportional to the slit width so, if the slit width decreases the width of central bright fringe increases. Thus option (a) is correct.
The slit width is half of the initial value and there is inverse dependence of width of central maxima and slit width so decrease in slit width widens the central bright fringe. Thus option (b) is incorrect.
The width of the central bright fringe is inversely proportional; so decrease in slit width will increase width. Thus option (c) is incorrect.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 38 Solutions
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Technology Update (No access codes included)
- Table P35.80 presents data gathered by students performing a double-slit experiment. The distance between the slits is 0.0700 mm, and the distance to the screen is 2.50 m. The intensity of the central maximum is 6.50 106 W/m2. What is the intensity at y = 0.500 cm? TABLE P35.80arrow_forwardA Fraunhofer diffraction pattern is produced on a screen located 1.00 m from a single slit. If a light source of wavelength 5.00 107 m is used and the distance from the center of the central bright fringe to the first dark fringe is 5.00 103 m, what is the slit width? (a) 0.010 0 mm (b) 0.100 mm (c) 0.200 mm (d) 1.00 mm (e) 0.005 00 mmarrow_forwardWhy is monochromatic light used in the double slit experiment? What would happen if white light were used?arrow_forward
- If 580-nm light falls on a slit 0.05 mm wide, what is the full angular width of the centraldiffraction peak? A single slit 1.0 mm wide is illuminated by 450-nm light. What is the width of the centralmaximum (in cm) in the diffraction pattern on a screen 7.0 m away?arrow_forwardcan you explain how the answer for the last question is 6.248966E-7?arrow_forwardConsider a 505-nm light falling on a single slit of width 1.1 µm. Hint a. At what angle is the first minimum of the diffraction intensity? First minimum is at deg. b. Will there be a second minimum? Yes. No. Not enough information.arrow_forward
- The width of the central peak in a single-slit diffraction pattern is 5.0 mm. The wavelength of the light is 600. nm, and the screen is 1.9 m from the slit. (a.) What is the width of the slit in microns? (D= ?) (b.) What is the ratio of the intensity at 4.2mm from the center of the pattern to the intensity at the center of the pattern? (I/I0= ?)arrow_forwardSuppose a laser shines through a double slit with separation d. The patern on the screen is .9 m from the slits. The distance between the two bright fringes (△y) is measured in mm. See the attatched plot. What is the wave number for the light in inverse nanometers?arrow_forwardIn a diffraction experiment set-up, second maximum is located 15 mm from the central bright fringe. A 668-nm monochromatic light is allowed to pass through a single slit which is 4.5 meters away from the screen. What must be the width of this single slit?arrow_forward
- The figure below shows the standard setup for Young's double-slit experiment. The spacing between the slits is d, and the screen is a distance L away from the slits. The derivation of the two-slit interference conditions assumes that the two lines of sight to a point P are parallel, since L>d, allowing us to approximate the path length difference as 42= dsıne. How 3.00 cm, d = 0.740 mm, and 0 = good is this approximation? Suppose that L = approximation for a case where L is closer to d.) 9.00°. (Under normal experimental conditions, L/d would be much larger than this, but we want to test the Use geometry and trigonometry to compute the value for the actual path length difference A2. Enter your answer as a positive value. 337.3 m Incorrect. Tries 2/100 Previous Tries Submit Answer By what percentage does this value differ from the approximation Al=dsint? (Enter your answer as a positive number, without the percent sign. Be sure to keep lots of digits in your calculations!) Submit Answer…arrow_forwardWhen performing a Young's double slit experiment, what is the required separation distance between the two slits (in micrometers) to cause 534 nm light to have its first order maximum at an angle of 22.1 degrees? Your Answer:arrow_forwardHow much diffraction spreading does a light beam undergo? One quantitative answer is the full width at half maximum of the central maximum of the single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction pattern. You can evaluate this angle of spreading in this problem. (a) as shown, define φ = πa sin φ/λ and show that at the point where I = 0.5Imax we must have φ = √2 sin φ. (b) Let y1 = sin φ and y2 = φ = /√2. Plot y1 and y2 on the same set of axes over a range from φ = 1 rad to φ = π/2 rad. Determine φ from the point of intersection of the two curves. (c) Then show that if the fraction λ/a is notlarge, the angular full width at half maximum of the central diffraction maximum is θ = 0.885λ/a. (d) What If? Another method to solve the transcendental equation φ = √2 sin φ in part (a) is to guess a first value of φ, use a computer or calculator to see how nearly it fits, and continue to update your estimate until the equation balances. How many steps(iterations) does this process take?arrow_forward
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student...PhysicsISBN:9780078807213Author:Paul W. ZitzewitzPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax