The article “High Levels of Mercury Are Found in Californians” (Los Angeles Times, February 9, 2006) describes a study in which hair samples were tested for mercury. The hair samples were obtained from more than 6000 people who voluntarily sent hair samples to researchers at Greenpeace and The Sierra Club. The researchers found that nearly one-third of those tested had mercury levels that exceeded the concentration thought to be safe. Is it reasonable to generalize this result to the larger population of U.S. adults? Explain why or why not.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 2 Solutions
Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Essentials of Statistics, Books a la Carte Edition (5th Edition)
Applied Statistics in Business and Economics
Stats: Modeling the World Nasta Edition Grades 9-12
The Practice of Statistics for AP - 4th Edition
Introductory Statistics
Business Statistics: A First Course (7th Edition)
- What is meant by the sample space of an experiment?arrow_forwardWhat is an experiment?arrow_forwardIt appears that there is some truth to the old adage “That which doesn’t kill us makes us stronger.” Seery, Holman, and Silver (2010) found that indi- viduals with some history of adversity report better mental health and higher well-being compared to people with little or no history of adversity. In an attempt to examine this phenomenon, a researcher surveys a group of college students to determine the negative life events that they experienced in the past 5 years and their current feeling of well-being. For n = 18 participants with 2 or fewer negative experi- ences, the average well-being score is M = 42 with SS = 398, and for n = 16 participants with5 to 10 negative experiences the average score is M = 48.6 with SS = 370.a. Is there a significant difference between the two populations represented by these two samples? Use a two-tailed test with α = .05arrow_forward
- 1. Individual actions can play a large role in the overall health of our planet. A researcher interested in evaluating environmentally friendly behaviors evaluated how often people recycle (per month) based on whether they have an overall optimistic or an overall pessimistic attitude toward eco-friendly behaviors. Here are the results: n=10-1 VR Pessimistic n=10 M = 2.9 SS=40,90 Optimistic n = 10 M = 6.8 SS=25.60 alpha= .05. a. Test whether or not recycling behaviors differed between groups. Use the hypothesis testing steps & b. Compute Cohen's d to measure the effect size. c. What was the power for this study? th. There is no difference in recycling behaviors between pessimistic and optimistic indyaucus H. There is a significant difference in recycling behaviors between pessimist and optimistic indindudes. DE 4= gnificance level 0.05 Statistic +=(x-m/s/√narrow_forwardEcolabels such as Energy Star, Green Key, and Audubon International are used by hotels to advertise their energy-saving and conservation policies. To investigate how familiar travelers are with these ecolabels and whether travelers believe they are credible, a sample of 392 adult travelers was administered a questionnaire. One question showed a list of 5 different ecolabels and asked "How familiar are you with this ecolabel, on a scale of 1 (not familiar at all) to 5 (very familiar)". Results of the survey were shown in the table below. Which Ecolabel has the largest variation in travelers' response of familiarity? ECOLABEL Energy Star Green Key Audubon International Green Business Bureau TripAdvisor Greenleaders O Green Business Bureau O Audubon International Green Key O Energy Star Mean 4.44 2.01 2.41 2.25 3.57 Standard Deviation 0.82 1.30 1.44 1.39 1.38arrow_forwardWhat is the answer to question 15?arrow_forward
- 4. The placebo effect describes the phenomenon of improvement in the condition of a patient taking a placebo – a pill that looks and tastes real but contains no medically active chemicals. Physicians at a clinic in La Jolla, California, gave what they thought were drugs to 7,000 asthma, ulcer, and herpes patients. Although the doctors later learned that the drugs were really placebos, 70% of the patients reported an improved condition. Use this information to test (at a=.05) the placebo effect at the clinic. Assume that if the placebo is ineffective, the probability of a patient's condition improving is 0.5. Calculate the p value for the testarrow_forwardJust need work shown. :)arrow_forwardFor which reason is it a problem when journalists only report on one study? a. It can lead people to think journalists are scientists. b. It can cause people to interrogate a study’s validities. c. It can lead people to value one study over decades of previous research. d. It can make journalists look bad.arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtCollege Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning