Operations and Supply Chain Management 9th edition
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781119320975
Author: Roberta S. Russell, Bernard W. Taylor III
Publisher: WILEY
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1.S, Problem 27P
Summary Introduction
To draw: The sequential decision tree for different decision situation provided and to estimate whether the bid should be made by the company or not.
Introduction: Decision analysis can be interpreted as the most common technique to make a decision in the situation when there is uncertainty. It uses quantitative measures to analyze the decision that is also used in operation of the firms.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The Energy Tech Company is considering making a bid for a fuel processing contract from the Uganda government. Energy Tech's CEO decided to bid $112 million. The management team estimates that it has a 60% chance of winning the contract with this bid amount.
If the company wins the contract, it can choose one of three methods for processing the fuel. The company can develop a new method to process the fuel, use the existing process, though inefficient, or to subcontract the processing to a number of smaller companies once they get the fuel.
The following tables present the results of these alternatives:
DEVELOP NEW PROCESS
Outcomes
Probability
Profit in ($1,000,000s)
High success
0.30
$600
Moderate success
0.60
$300
Failure
0.10
($100)
USE CURRENT, BUT INEFFICIENT PROCESS:
Outcomes
Probability
Profit ($1,000,000s)
High success
0.50
$300
Moderate success
0.30
$200
Failure
0.20
($40)
SUBCONTRACT:
Outcome…
The Americo Oil Company is considering making a bid for a shale oil development contract to be awarded by the federal government. The company has decided to bid $112 million. The company estimates that it has a 60% chance of winning the contract with this bid. If the firm wins the contract, it can choose one of three methods for getting the oil from the shale. It can develop a new method for oil extraction, use an existing (inefficient) process, or subcontract the processing to a number of smaller companies once the shale has been excavated. The results from these alternatives are as follows: Develop new process: Outcomes Probability Profit ($1,000,000s) Great success .30 $ 600 Moderate success .60 300 Failure .10 -100 Use present process: Outcomes Probability Profit ($1,000,000s) Great success .50 $ 300 Moderate success .30 200 Failure .20 -40 Subcontract: Outcome Probability Profit ($1,000,000s) Moderate success 1.00 250 The cost of preparing the contract proposal is $2 million. If…
Johnson Chemicals is considering two options for its supplier portfolio. Option 1 uses two local suppliers. Each has a
"unique-event" risk of 5.8%, and the probability of a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be
1.4%. Option 2 uses two suppliers located in different countries. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 11%, and the probability of
a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be 0.18%.
a) The probability that both suppliers will be disrupted using option 1 is 0.01731 (round your response to five decimal places).
b) The probability that both suppliers will be disrupted using option 2 is 0.0121 (round your response to five decimal places).
Chapter 1 Solutions
Operations and Supply Chain Management 9th edition
Ch. 1.S - Prob. 1PCh. 1.S - Prob. 2PCh. 1.S - Prob. 3PCh. 1.S - Prob. 4PCh. 1.S - Prob. 5PCh. 1.S - In Problem S1-5 assume that Nicole, with the help...Ch. 1.S - Prob. 7PCh. 1.S - Prob. 8PCh. 1.S - Telecomp, a computer manufacturer with a global...Ch. 1.S - Prob. 10P
Ch. 1.S - Prob. 11PCh. 1.S - Prob. 12PCh. 1.S - Prob. 13PCh. 1.S - Prob. 14PCh. 1.S - Prob. 15PCh. 1.S - Prob. 16PCh. 1.S - Prob. 17PCh. 1.S - Prob. 18PCh. 1.S - In Problem S1-18, assume the Weight Club is able...Ch. 1.S - Prob. 20PCh. 1.S - Prob. 21PCh. 1.S - Prob. 22PCh. 1.S - Prob. 23PCh. 1.S - Prob. 24PCh. 1.S - Prob. 25PCh. 1.S - Prob. 26PCh. 1.S - Prob. 27PCh. 1.S - Prob. 28PCh. 1.S - Prob. 29PCh. 1.S - Prob. 30PCh. 1.S - Prob. 31PCh. 1.S - Prob. 33PCh. 1.S - Prob. 34PCh. 1.S - Alex Mason has a wide-curving, uphill driveway...Ch. 1.S - Prob. 36PCh. 1.S - Prob. 39PCh. 1.S - Prob. 40PCh. 1.S - State University has three healthcare plans for...Ch. 1.S - The Orchard Wine Company purchases grapes from one...Ch. 1.S - Prob. 43PCh. 1.S - Prob. 1.1CPCh. 1.S - Prob. 2.1CPCh. 1.S - Evaluating Projects at Nexcom Systems Nexcom...Ch. 1 - Feeding America Each year, the Feeding America...Ch. 1 - Feeding America Each year, the Feeding America...Ch. 1 - Feeding America Each year, the Feeding America...Ch. 1 - Feeding America Each year, the Feeding America...Ch. 1 - Prob. 1QCh. 1 - What constitutes operations at (a) a bank, (b) a...Ch. 1 - Prob. 3QCh. 1 - Prob. 4QCh. 1 - Prob. 5QCh. 1 - Prob. 17QCh. 1 - What is the difference between an order winner and...Ch. 1 - Prob. 21QCh. 1 - Prob. 22QCh. 1 - Prob. 23QCh. 1 - Prob. 24QCh. 1 - Prob. 1PCh. 1 - Prob. 2PCh. 1 - Prob. 3PCh. 1 - Prob. 4PCh. 1 - Prob. 5PCh. 1 - Omar Industries maintains production facilities in...Ch. 1 - Rushing yardage for three Heisman Trophy...Ch. 1 - Carpet City recorded the following data on carpet...Ch. 1 - Prob. 9PCh. 1 - Prob. 10PCh. 1 - Prob. 11PCh. 1 - Prob. 12PCh. 1 - Prob. 13PCh. 1 - Prob. 14PCh. 1 - Prob. 15PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.1CPCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2CPCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3CPCh. 1 - Prob. 1.4CPCh. 1 - Prob. 1.5CPCh. 1 - Prob. 2.1CPCh. 1 - Prob. 2.2CP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Machado Construction is considering two options for its supplier portfolio. Option 1 uses two local suppliers. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 8%, and the probability of a "super-even" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be 2.5%. Option 2 uses two suppliers located in different countries. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 18%, and the probability of a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be 1.2%. (a) What is the probability that both suppliers will be disrupted using option 1? (b) What is the probability that both suppliers will be disrupted using option 2? (c) Which option would provide the lowest risk of a total shutdown?arrow_forwardA manufacturing firm plans to expand the current distribution network. The manager of the firm considers whether to extend a long-term contract with the current company who has done business with the firm in the past and whose distribution system reaches 60% of all potential customers. The second option is to sign a one-year contract with a new distribution company. The new company used to reach only 30% of customers, but they claim that they have invested heavily over the past year in distribution resources and now expect to be able to reach 80% of customers. The manager is not that sure about the new company’s claim and give them about 50% of trust. If the new distributor still covers only 30% in year 1, however, the company can switch back to the familiar old distributor. The manager of the firm wants to develop two-scenario plans: 3-year and 10-year planning horizon. Which distributor should the manager choose for each plan? Show your analysis.arrow_forwardRisk manager Camila De Leon of Johnson Chemicals is considering two options for the firm's supplier portfolio. Option 1 uses two local suppliers. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 5.8%, and the probability of a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be 1.3%. Option 2 uses two suppliers located in different countries. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 14%, and the probability of a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be .24%. a) The probability that both suppliers will be disrupted using option 1 is b)Similarly, determine the probability of a total disruption for option 2. c) Which option would provide the lowest risk of a total shutdown?arrow_forward
- Risk manager Camila De Leon of Johnson Chemicals is considering two options for the firm's supplier portfolio. Option 1 uses two local suppliers. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 5.8%, and the probability of a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be 1.3%. Option 2 uses two suppliers located in different countries. Each has a "unique-event" risk of 14%, and the probability of a "super-event" that would disable both at the same time is estimated to be .24%.arrow_forwardPLE has developed a prototype for a new snow blower for the consumer market. This can exploit the company’s expertise in small-gasoline-engine technology and also balance seasonal demand cycles in the North American and European markets to provide additional revenues during the winter months. Initially, PLE faces two possible decisions: introduce the product globally at a cost of $850,000 or evaluate it in a North American test market at a cost of $200,000. If it introduces the product globally, PLE might find either a high or low response to the product. The probabilities of these events are estimated to be 0.6 and 0.4, respectively. With a high response, gross revenues of $2,000,000 are expected; with a low response, the figure is $450,000. If PLE starts with a North American test market, it might find a low response or a high response, with probabilities of 0.3 and 0.7, respectively. This may or may not reflect the global market potential. In any case, after conducting the marketing…arrow_forwardJoel Deaine, CEO of Deaine Enterprises Incorporated (DEI), is considering a special offer to manufacture a new line of women’s clothing for a large department store chain. DEI has specialized in designer women’s clothing sold in small, upscale retail clothing stores throughout the country. To protect the very elite brand image, DEI has not sold clothing to large department stores. The current offer, however, might be too good to turn down. The department store is willing to commit to a large order, which would be very profitable to DEI, and the order would be renewed automatically for two more years, presumably to continue after that point. Required: Determine Joel’s competitive strategy (cost leadership or differentiation) and use this strategy to analyze the choice Joel faces.arrow_forward
- Joel Deaine, CEO of Deaine Enterprises Incorporated (DEI), is considering a special offer to manufacture a new line of women’s clothing for a large department store chain. DEI has specialized in designer women’s clothing sold in small, upscale retail clothing stores throughout the country. To protect the very elite brand image, DEI has not sold clothing to large department stores. The current offer, however, might be too good to turn down. The department store is willing to commit to a large order, which would be very profitable to DEI, and the order would be renewed automatically for two more years, presumably to continue after that point. Required: Explain two of the implementation tools covered in this chapter that Joel can use to implement his strategy.arrow_forwardThe Irontown Independent School District wants to sell a parcel of unimproved land that it does not need. Its three best offers are as follows: Organization/Company Offer Proposed Use The State Department of Public Safety (DPS) $5.7 million New state highway patrol barracks The Lexington Presbyterian Church $5.6 million Start a church school Newberry Inc. $5.5 million Open a car dealership As the financial adviser for the school district, which offer would you prefer?arrow_forwardA company is choosing an outside firm to provide its payroll services. It has chosen four comparative categories of interest: client reviews, financial condition, IT capabilities, and government stability. These categories have been assigned weights of 20%, 10%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. Two potential providers were scored on each of those factors (see table below) using a scale of 1-10, with a score of 1 meaning worst possible and 10 meaning best possible. Using the factor-rating method, which provider should be chosen? Provider A Provider B Client reviews 2 6 Financial condition 8 4 IT capabilities 5 8 Government stability 3 1arrow_forward
- The owner of the Columbia Construction Company must decide between building a housing development, constructing a shopping center, and leasing all the company’s equipment to another company. The profit that will result from each alternative will be determined by whether material costs remain stable or increase. The profit from each alternative, given the two possibilities for material costs, is shown in the following payoff table: Material Costs Decision Stable Increase Houses $70,000 $30,000 Shopping center 105,000 20,000 Leasing 40,000 40,000 Determine the best decision, using the following decision criteria. a. Maximax b. Maximin c. Minimax regret d. Hurwicz e. Equal likelihoodarrow_forwardA large multinational oil company is considering its strategy in the North See. The UK government has announced that a new drilling site in the North Sea will be offered for sale on a competitive tender basis, the site going to the company making the highest bid. Provisional exploration of the site indicates that, over its life, it can be expected to generate revenue of around £1,500 million if the oil reserves turn out to be high, but only £500 million if they turn out to be low. Seismic tests have indicated that the probability of high reserves is 0.60. If the company is successful in its bid, it will also have to decide whether to construct a new oil rig for the site or to move an existing oil rig which is currently operating at an uneconomic site. The costs of the new rig are around £250 million and for moving the existing rig around £100 million. A new rig would be able to boost production by £150 million if reserve levels turned out to be high. The company has decided that if it…arrow_forwardA farmer is trying to decide if continuing to farm is the correct thing to do. Yields on his fields have been declining over the past several seasons. He has an offer on the table from a corporate farmer to lease his land for the season for $15,000. Whether or not he accepts this offer depends on how well his fields will produce and the market value of his crops. If yield is high, the farmer will make $50,000 and there is a 10% possibility of this occurring. If yield is medium, the farmer will make $20,000 and there is a 50% possibility of this occurring. If yield is low, the farmer will make $12,000 and there is a 40% possibility of this occurring. Draw a decision tree for this problem. What should the farmer do according to the decision tree? If the farmer could get more information that would help him predict his yield, what is the maximum amount that he should pay for this information?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning