Concept explainers
Videos
Evaluating Projects at Nexcom Systems
Nexcom Systems develops information technology systems for commercial sale. Each year it considers and evaluates a number of different projects to undertake. It develops a road map for each project in the form of a decision tree that identifies the different decision points in the development process from the initial decision to invest in a project’s development through the actual commercialization of the final product.
The first decision point in the development process is whether or not to fund a proposed project for one year. If the decision is no, then there is no resulting cost; if the decision is yes, then the project proceeds at an incremental cost to the company. The company establishes specific short-term, early technical milestones for its projects after one year. If the early milestones are achieved, the project proceeds to the next phase of project development; if the milestones are not achieved, the project is abandoned. In its planning process, the company develops probability estimates of achieving and not achieving the early milestones. If the early milestones are achieved, then the project is funded for further development during an extended time frame specific to a project. At the end of this time frame, a project is evaluated according to a second set of (later) technical milestones. Again the company attaches probability estimates for achieving and not achieving these later milestones. If the late milestones are not achieved, the project is abandoned.
If the late milestones are achieved, this means that technical uncertainties and problems have been overcome and the company next assesses the project’s ability to meet its strategic business objectives. At this stage the company wants to know if the eventual product coincides with the company’s competencies, and if there appears to be an eventual clear market for the product. It invests in a product “prelaunch” to ascertain the answers to these questions. The outcomes of the prelaunch are that either there is a strategic fit or there is not, and the company assigns probability estimates to each of these two possible outcomes. If there is not a strategic fit at this point, the project is abandoned and the company loses its investment in the prelaunch process. If it is determined that there is a strategic fit, then three possible decisions result. (1) The company can invest in the product’s launch and a successful or unsuccessful outcome will result, each with an estimated probability of occurrence. (2) The company can delay the product’s launch and at a later date decide whether to launch or abandon. (3) If it launches later, then the outcomes are success or failure, each with an estimated probability of occurrence. Also, if the product launch is delayed, there is always a likelihood that the technology will become obsolete or dated in the near future, which tends to reduce the expected return.
The table provides the various costs, event probabilities, and investment outcomes for five projects the company is considering.
Determine the expected value for each project and then rank the projects accordingly for the company to consider.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 1 Solutions
Operations and Supply Chain Management 9th edition
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains (12th Edition) (What's New in Operations Management)
Operations Management, Binder Ready Version: An Integrated Approach
Business in Action (8th Edition)
Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains (11th Edition)
Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (12th Edition)
- Zaki has been thinking about starting his own petrol station. He’s problem is to decide how large his petrol station should be. The annual return that will be achieved depends on whether the economy is good, fair, or poor. A payoff table has been constructed to illustrate this situation: (Business Quantitative Analysis) Determine using the best investment using the following decision criteria: a) Maximax criterion b) Maximin criterion c) Equally Likely criterion d) Minimax Regret criterion The probabilities of good market, average market, and poor market are 0.4, 0.5, and 0.1 respectively. Construct an expected opportunity loss table. Using minimum EOL as the decision criterion, determine the best alternativearrow_forwardDevelop a decision analysis formulation of this problem by identifying the decision alternatives, state of nature, and the payoff table.arrow_forwardA real estate developer is looking into options to develop a 100,000 sq meters of land that he owns by the sea in a touristic Mediterranean city. The developer has completed a framing exercise during which a decision hierarchy was identified to guide the generation of alternative strategies. The following decisions were considered in the decision hierarchy: what type of development to build, how to finance this development, will we develop the full extent of the land, will we sell units before construction is complete, which contractor should we hire for the job. a)Classify the listed decisions into given, focus and non-focus decisions. b)For each focus decision identified above, propose two mutually exclusive options and develop a strategy table accordingly. c)Identify in the strategy table two alternative development strategies for the development. d)List one value measure that will guide the decision of the developer to decide on preferred development alternative.arrow_forward
- PLE has developed a prototype for a new snow blower for the consumer market. This can exploit the company’s expertise in small-gasoline-engine technology and also balance seasonal demand cycles in the North American and European markets to provide additional revenues during the winter months. Initially, PLE faces two possible decisions: introduce the product globally at a cost of $850,000 or evaluate it in a North American test market at a cost of $200,000. If it introduces the product globally, PLE might find either a high or low response to the product. The probabilities of these events are estimated to be 0.6 and 0.4, respectively. With a high response, gross revenues of $2,000,000 are expected; with a low response, the figure is $450,000. If PLE starts with a North American test market, it might find a low response or a high response, with probabilities of 0.3 and 0.7, respectively. This may or may not reflect the global market potential. In any case, after conducting the marketing…arrow_forwardDevelop a spreadsheet for the question. The vice president of finance has looked at your ooriginal scoring model and feels that tax considerations should be included in teh model with a weight of 15. In addition, the VP has scored the methods on tax considerations as follows: method A recieved a score of 3, method B recieved a score of 2, and Method C recieved a score of 1. How would this additional information affect your recommendation?arrow_forwardFollowing an all-star school soccer career, Kelly Williams has been offered scholarships to five universities. She has had a difficult time making a decision and has decided to use a scoring model to help evaluate the different offers. The following table includes a weighted list of criteria she has developed and a grade showing how well each school satisfies the criteria: Rank the universities according to their scores to assist Kelly in making her decision.arrow_forward
- This is the same payoff table used in questions 2 and 3. Below is a payoff table that lists four mortgage options: Decision 1-year ARM 3-year ARM 5-year Arm 30-year fixed Rates Rise $66,645 $62,857 $55,895 $52,276 Outcomes Rates Stable $43,650 $47,698 $50,894 $52,276 4) Which of the following decisions has the best average payoff? CA. 3-year ARM B. 1-year ARM CC. 5-year ARM CD. 30-year Fixed Rates Fall $38,560 $42,726 $48,134 $52,276arrow_forwardDo the engineers face the decision problem involving the selection of the best course of action when there are several ways to meet a project's requirements?arrow_forwardThere are three 3-month-long options to treat studentitis, a depression-like condition in which a student thinks he or she will be in college forever with no option for parole. Results (effectiveness) cannot be determined until students have been exposed to the treatments for a period of 3 months. Option I is the standard option, which consists of group counseling. Option II consists of a new studentitis medication that has not side effects. Option III consists of a combination of the new medication and group counseling. Below are costs and effectiveness data for each option: Option Costs (per Effectiveness month) $100 $50 | (counseling) I (medication) II (combination) $150 Calculate an average cost-effectiveness ratio for Options I, II, and III 40% 50% 60%arrow_forward
- The CrystalTip Company has a production plan. The company wants to determine which of their premium products to concentrate on producing for the next few months. The Payoff table presented below shows the decision alternatives, states of nature (level of demand) and the payoffs (profits). Payoff (profit 000) states of natureAlternatives Option Low Moderate High Putpletip $1500 $5,500 $8,000Goldtip -$150 $6,250 $10,500Silvertip…arrow_forwardA manufacturing firm plans to expand the current distribution network. The manager of the firm considers whether to extend a long-term contract with the current company who has done business with the firm in the past and whose distribution system reaches 60% of all potential customers. The second option is to sign a one-year contract with a new distribution company. The new company used to reach only 30% of customers, but they claim that they have invested heavily over the past year in distribution resources and now expect to be able to reach 80% of customers. The manager is not that sure about the new company’s claim and give them about 50% of trust. If the new distributor still covers only 30% in year 1, however, the company can switch back to the familiar old distributor. The manager of the firm wants to develop two-scenario plans: 3-year and 10-year planning horizon. Which distributor should the manager choose for each plan? Show your analysis.arrow_forwardShawna is the marketing manager for Yummy Marinades and Dips. The company wants to should introduce a new cooking sauce product line with the brand Con-Cook-Tions. Shawna is deciding if she would initially do a test market in selected cities on the East Coast or do a big national product launch. The cost of doing the test market is $150,000. If Shawna does the test market, she has to wait for the results of the test market before she decides to do a nationwide launch of Con-Cook-Tions. The probability of a positive response from the test market result is estimated to be 0.6. Alternatively, Shawna could also decide to bypass the test market and go ahead with the national launch. If Con-Cook-Tions is launched nationally and becomes a huge success, the company estimates that it will realize an annual profit of $1.6 million. If the launch fails and the market reacts negatively to the sauces, Yummy will incur a loss of $700,000. Shawna company believes the probability of success for…arrow_forward
Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,