Concept explainers
You have enough information from this chapter to estimate the distance to Alpha Centauri, the second nearest star, which has an apparent magnitude of 0. Since it is a G2 star, like the Sun, assume it has the same luminosity as the Sun and the difference in magnitudes is a result only of the difference in distance. Estimate how far away Alpha Centauri is. Describe the necessary steps in words and then do the calculation. (As we will learn in the Celestial Distances chapter, this method-namely, assuming that stars with identical spectral types emit the same amount of energy-is actually used to estimate distances to stars.) If you assume the distance to the Sun is in AU, your answer will come out in AU.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 17 Solutions
Astronomy
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Physics (5th Edition)
Essential University Physics: Volume 1 (3rd Edition)
The Cosmic Perspective Fundamentals (2nd Edition)
Conceptual Physical Science (6th Edition)
An Introduction to Thermal Physics
Glencoe Physical Science 2012 Student Edition (Glencoe Science) (McGraw-Hill Education)
- Approximately 6000 stars are bright enough to be seen without a telescope. Are any of these white dwarfs? Use the information given in this chapter to explain your reasoning.arrow_forwardA G2 star has a luminosity 100 times that of the Sun. What kind of star is it? How does its radius compare with that of the Sun?arrow_forwardIf you were to compare three stars with the same surface temperature, with one star being a giant, another a supergiant, and the third a main-sequence star, how would their radii compare to one another?arrow_forward
- Appendix J lists the stars that appear brightest in our sky. Are most of these hotter or cooler than the Sun? Can you suggest a reason for the difference between this answer and the answer to the previous question? (Hint: Look at the luminosities.) Is there any tendency for a correlation between temperature and luminosity? Are there exceptions to the correlation?arrow_forwardYou observe a star with a telescope over the course of a year. You find that this star has a flux that is one-trillionth of the Sun's flux. You also observe a parallax shift for this star of 0.042 arcseconds. What is the luminosity of this star as a multiple of the Sun's luminosity L⊙. [Hint: use the flux formula in the form of a ratio, along with one other formula. Express your answer as a multiple of the Sun's luminosity---e.g., 150 L⊙---entering only that multiple (e.g., you would enter 150).]arrow_forwardHow does one go about these questions?arrow_forward
- As a star runs out of hydrogen to fuel nuclear fusion in its core, changes within the star usually cause it to leave the main sequence, expanding and cooling as it does so. Would a star with a radius 12 times that of the Sun, but a surface temperature 0.5 times that of the Sun, be more, or less luminous than the Sun? Show and explain your reasoning. You may assume the surface area of a sphere is A = 4πr2.arrow_forwardA star has a parallax angle of 0.0270 arcseconds and an apparent magnitude of 4.641. The distance to this star is 37.03 parsecs and the absolute magintude is 1.79. 18: What is the luminosity of this star? (HINT: The luminosity of the Sun is 3.85×1026 W.) Using the Forumla M1 - M2 = -2.5 log(L1/L2) the absolute magnitude of the Sun is 4.8arrow_forward"51 Pegasi" is the name of the first normal star (besides the Sun) around which a planet was discovered. It is in the constellation Pegasus the horse. Its parallax is measured to be 0.064 arcsec. a. What is its distance from us? b. The apparent brightness is 1.79 × 10-10 J/(s·m2 ). What is the luminosity? How does that compare with that of the Sun? Look up the temperature: how doarrow_forward
- I need the answer as soon as possiblearrow_forwardThe mass-luminosity relation describes the mathematical relationship between luminosity and mass for main sequence stars. It describes how a star with a mass of 4 M⊙ would have a luminosity of ______ L⊙. If a star has a radius 1/2 that of the Sun and a temperature 4 that of the Sun, how many times higher is the star's luminosity than that of the Sun? (If it is smaller by a factor of 8, you would write 0.125 because 1/8=0.125) If a star has a radius 2 times larger than the Sun's and a luminosity 1/4th that of the Sun, how many times higher is the star's temperature than that of the Sun? (If it is smaller by a factor of 8, you would write 0.125 because 1/8=0.125) If a star has a surface temperature 2 times lower than the Sun's and a luminosity the same as the Sun, how many times larger is the star than the Sun? (If it is smaller by a factor of 8, you would write 0.125 because 1/8=0.125)arrow_forwardWe will take a moment to compare how brightly a white dwarf star shines compared to a red giant star. For the sake of this problem, let's assume a white dwarf has a temperature around 10,000 K and a red giant has a temperature around 5,000 K. As for their stellar radiatin, the white dwarf has a radius about 1/100th that of the Sun, and a red giant has a radius around 100 times larger than the Sun. With this in mind, how does the luminosity of a red giant star compare to that of a white dwarf (Hint: do not try to enter all of these numbers into the luminosity equation {it won't go well}; instead, remember that you are only interested in the ratio between the two, so all common units and components can be divided out)? Please enter your answer in terms of the luminosity of the red giant divided by the luminosity of the white dwarf and round to two significant figures. Also, please avoid using commas in your answer.arrow_forward
- Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningStars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage LearningAstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStax