![Using MIS (10th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134606996/9780134606996_largeCoverImage.gif)
The spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel file Ch01Ex01_U10e.xlsx contains records of employee activity on special projects. Open this workbook and examine the data that you find in the three spreadsheets it contains. Assess the accuracy, relevancy, and sufficiency of this data to the following people and problems.
- a. You manage the Denver plant, and you want to know how much time your employees are spending on special projects.
- b. You manage the Reno plant, and you want to know how much time your employees are spending on special projects.
- c. You manage the Quota Computation project in Chicago, and you want to know how much time your employees have spent on that project.
- d. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know the total time employees have spent on your project.
- e. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know the total labor cost for all employees on your project.
- f. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know how the labor-hour total for your project compares to the labor-hour totals for the other special projects.
- g. What conclusions can you make from this exercise?
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
a.
Time taken by employees for completing the special project in Denver plant:
Special project at Denver involves Market Analysis, Quota computation, Sourcing review and Production planning.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation is “22+30+17+31=100” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Market analysis is “17+21=38” hours.
- Time taken by employees for sourcing review is “9+22+10+21+5=67” hours.
- Time taken by employees for production planning is “12+15+21+35+20+19=122 hours”
Therefore, time taken by employees for completing the special project in Denver plant is “327”hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
b.
Time taken by employees for completing the special projects in Reno plant:
Special project at Reno plant involves Quota computation, Sourcing review and Production planning.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation is “27+42=69” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Sourcing review is “17+23+21+27=88” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Production planning is “19+20+11=50” hours.
Therefore, the time taken by employees for completing the special project in Reno plant is “207” hours.
c.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
Time taken by employees for Quota Computation in Chicago plant:
Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant for Quota computation is: “27+12+22+29+11+29 = 130” hours.
Therefore, the time taken by employees for computation in Chicago plant is “130” hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
d.
Total time taken by employees for Quota Computation for all plants:
Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant, Denver plant and Reno plant for Quota computation is:
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation in Denver plant is “22+30+17+31=100” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation in Reno plant is “27+42=69” hours.
- Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant for Quota computation is: “27+12+22+29+11+29 = 130”hours.
Therefore, the total time taken by employees is: “100+69+130=299” hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
e.
Total labor cost for all employees in the Quota computation project:
- Suppose the hourly pay of an employee is “$30”.
- The number of hours worked by the employees on Quota computation project is “299” hours.
Labor cost= hourly wage × number of hours = 30 × 299 = $8970
Therefore, the total labor cost for all employees in the quota computation project is “8970$”.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
f.
Comparison of labor hour total for Quota computation with other projects:
- The total time taken by employees for Quota computation is: “100+69+130=299” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for market analysis is “38” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for sourcing review is “67+88+52=207” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for production planning is “122+75+50 =247” hours.
Thus, the ratio of Quota computation with Market analysis = 299/38=7.86 hours, the ratio of Quota computation with sourcing review = 299/207=1.44 hours, and the ratio of Quota computation with production planning = 299/247= 1.21 hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
g.
Conclusion:
From the above questions, it can be observed that Quota computation almost takes “37%” of the total time taken to complete all projects as compared to the projects – market analysis, sourcing review and production planning.
Therefore, it can be said that the labor employed in Quota computation project is less efficient as compared to the other three projects.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter AE Solutions
Using MIS (10th Edition)
Additional Engineering Textbook Solutions
Java: An Introduction to Problem Solving and Programming (8th Edition)
SURVEY OF OPERATING SYSTEMS
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with C++ from Control Structures to Objects (9th Edition)
Computer Science: An Overview (13th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
Introduction To Programming Using Visual Basic (11th Edition)
- whats for dinner? pleasearrow_forwardConsider the follow program that prints a page number on the left or right side of a page. Define and use a new function, isEven, that returns a Boolean to make the condition in the if statement easier to understand. ef main() : page = int(input("Enter page number: ")) if page % 2 == 0 : print(page) else : print("%60d" % page) main()arrow_forwardWhat is the correct python code for the function def countWords(string) that will return a count of all the words in the string string of workds that are separated by spaces.arrow_forward
- Consider the following program that counts the number of spaces in a user-supplied string. Modify the program to define and use a function, countSpaces, instead. def main() : userInput = input("Enter a string: ") spaces = 0 for char in userInput : if char == " " : spaces = spaces + 1 print(spaces) main()arrow_forwardWhat is the python code for the function def readFloat(prompt) that displays the prompt string, followed by a space, reads a floating-point number in, and returns it. Here is a typical usage: salary = readFloat("Please enter your salary:") percentageRaise = readFloat("What percentage raise would you like?")arrow_forwardassume python does not define count method that can be applied to a string to determine the number of occurances of a character within a string. Implement the function numChars that takes a string and a character as arguments and determined and returns how many occurances of the given character occur withing the given stringarrow_forward
- Consider the ER diagram of online sales system above. Based on the diagram answer the questions below, a) Based on the ER Diagram, determine the Foreign Key in the Product Table. Just mention the name of the attribute that could be the Foreign Key. b) Mention the relationship between the Order and Customer Entities. You can use the following: 1:1, 1:M, M:1, 0:1, 1:0, M:0, 0:M c) Is there a direct relationship that exists between Store and Customer entities? Answer Yes/No? d) Which of the 4 Entities mention in the diagram can have a recursive relationship? e) If a new entity Order_Details is introduced, will it be a strong entity or weak entity? If it is a weak entity, then mention its type?arrow_forwardNo aiarrow_forwardGiven the dependency diagram of attributes {C1,C2,C3,C4,C5) in a table shown in the following figure, (the primary key attributes are underlined)arrow_forward
- What are 3 design techniques that enable data representations to be effective and engaging? What are some usability considerations when designing data representations? Provide examples or use cases from your professional experience.arrow_forward2D array, Passing Arrays to Methods, Returning an Array from a Method (Ch8) 2. Read-And-Analyze: Given the code below, answer the following questions. 2 1 import java.util.Scanner; 3 public class Array2DPractice { 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 public static void main(String args[]) { 17 } 18 // Get an array from the user int[][] m = getArray(); // Display array elements System.out.println("You provided the following array "+ java.util.Arrays.deepToString(m)); // Display array characteristics int[] r = findCharacteristics(m); System.out.println("The minimum value is: " + r[0]); System.out.println("The maximum value is: " + r[1]); System.out.println("The average is: " + r[2] * 1.0/(m.length * m[0].length)); 19 // Create an array from user input public static int[][] getArray() { 20 21 PASSTR2222322222222222 222323 F F F F 44 // Create a Scanner to read user input Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in); // Ask user to input a number, and grab that number with the Scanner…arrow_forwardGiven the dependency diagram of attributes C1,C2,C3,C4,C5 in a table shown in the following figure, the primary key attributes are underlined Make a database with multiple tables from attributes as shown above that are in 3NF, showing PK, non-key attributes, and FK for each table? Assume the tables are already in 1NF. Hint: 3 tables will result after deducing 1NF -> 2NF -> 3NFarrow_forward
- Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:CengageDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781305627482Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781285196145Author:Steven, Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel, Carlos, Coronel, Carlos; Morris, Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris, Steven Morris; Carlos CoronelPublisher:Cengage LearningA Guide to SQLComputer ScienceISBN:9781111527273Author:Philip J. PrattPublisher:Course Technology Ptr
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305627482/9781305627482_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285196145/9781285196145_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781111527273/9781111527273_smallCoverImage.gif)