
The spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel file Ch01Ex01_U10e.xlsx contains records of employee activity on special projects. Open this workbook and examine the data that you find in the three spreadsheets it contains. Assess the accuracy, relevancy, and sufficiency of this data to the following people and problems.
- a. You manage the Denver plant, and you want to know how much time your employees are spending on special projects.
- b. You manage the Reno plant, and you want to know how much time your employees are spending on special projects.
- c. You manage the Quota Computation project in Chicago, and you want to know how much time your employees have spent on that project.
- d. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know the total time employees have spent on your project.
- e. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know the total labor cost for all employees on your project.
- f. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know how the labor-hour total for your project compares to the labor-hour totals for the other special projects.
- g. What conclusions can you make from this exercise?

Explanation of Solution
a.
Time taken by employees for completing the special project in Denver plant:
Special project at Denver involves Market Analysis, Quota computation, Sourcing review and Production planning.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation is “22+30+17+31=100” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Market analysis is “17+21=38” hours.
- Time taken by employees for sourcing review is “9+22+10+21+5=67” hours.
- Time taken by employees for production planning is “12+15+21+35+20+19=122 hours”
Therefore, time taken by employees for completing the special project in Denver plant is “327”hours.

Explanation of Solution
b.
Time taken by employees for completing the special projects in Reno plant:
Special project at Reno plant involves Quota computation, Sourcing review and Production planning.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation is “27+42=69” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Sourcing review is “17+23+21+27=88” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Production planning is “19+20+11=50” hours.
Therefore, the time taken by employees for completing the special project in Reno plant is “207” hours.
c.

Explanation of Solution
Time taken by employees for Quota Computation in Chicago plant:
Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant for Quota computation is: “27+12+22+29+11+29 = 130” hours.
Therefore, the time taken by employees for computation in Chicago plant is “130” hours.

Explanation of Solution
d.
Total time taken by employees for Quota Computation for all plants:
Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant, Denver plant and Reno plant for Quota computation is:
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation in Denver plant is “22+30+17+31=100” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation in Reno plant is “27+42=69” hours.
- Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant for Quota computation is: “27+12+22+29+11+29 = 130”hours.
Therefore, the total time taken by employees is: “100+69+130=299” hours.

Explanation of Solution
e.
Total labor cost for all employees in the Quota computation project:
- Suppose the hourly pay of an employee is “$30”.
- The number of hours worked by the employees on Quota computation project is “299” hours.
Labor cost= hourly wage × number of hours = 30 × 299 = $8970
Therefore, the total labor cost for all employees in the quota computation project is “8970$”.

Explanation of Solution
f.
Comparison of labor hour total for Quota computation with other projects:
- The total time taken by employees for Quota computation is: “100+69+130=299” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for market analysis is “38” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for sourcing review is “67+88+52=207” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for production planning is “122+75+50 =247” hours.
Thus, the ratio of Quota computation with Market analysis = 299/38=7.86 hours, the ratio of Quota computation with sourcing review = 299/207=1.44 hours, and the ratio of Quota computation with production planning = 299/247= 1.21 hours.

Explanation of Solution
g.
Conclusion:
From the above questions, it can be observed that Quota computation almost takes “37%” of the total time taken to complete all projects as compared to the projects – market analysis, sourcing review and production planning.
Therefore, it can be said that the labor employed in Quota computation project is less efficient as compared to the other three projects.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter AE Solutions
Using MIS (10th Edition)
Additional Engineering Textbook Solutions
Java: An Introduction to Problem Solving and Programming (8th Edition)
SURVEY OF OPERATING SYSTEMS
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with C++ from Control Structures to Objects (9th Edition)
Computer Science: An Overview (13th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
Introduction To Programming Using Visual Basic (11th Edition)
- I need help fixing the minor issue where the text isn't in the proper place, and to ensure that the frequency cutoff is at the right place. My code: % Define frequency range for the plot f = logspace(1, 5, 500); % Frequency range from 10 Hz to 100 kHz w = 2 * pi * f; % Angular frequency % Parameters for the filters - let's adjust these to get more reasonable cutoffs R = 1e3; % Resistance in ohms (1 kΩ) C = 1e-6; % Capacitance in farads (1 μF) % For bandpass, we need appropriate L value for desired cutoffs L = 0.1; % Inductance in henries - adjusted for better bandpass response % Calculate cutoff frequencies first to verify they're in desired range f_cutoff_RC = 1 / (2 * pi * R * C); f_resonance = 1 / (2 * pi * sqrt(L * C)); Q_factor = (1/R) * sqrt(L/C); f_lower_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) + 1/(2*Q_factor)); f_upper_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) - 1/(2*Q_factor)); % Transfer functions % Low-pass filter (RC) H_low = 1 ./ (1 + 1i * w *…arrow_forwardMy code is experincing minor issue where the text isn't in the proper place, and to ensure that the frequency cutoff is at the right place. My code: % Define frequency range for the plot f = logspace(1, 5, 500); % Frequency range from 10 Hz to 100 kHz w = 2 * pi * f; % Angular frequency % Parameters for the filters - let's adjust these to get more reasonable cutoffs R = 1e3; % Resistance in ohms (1 kΩ) C = 1e-6; % Capacitance in farads (1 μF) % For bandpass, we need appropriate L value for desired cutoffs L = 0.1; % Inductance in henries - adjusted for better bandpass response % Calculate cutoff frequencies first to verify they're in desired range f_cutoff_RC = 1 / (2 * pi * R * C); f_resonance = 1 / (2 * pi * sqrt(L * C)); Q_factor = (1/R) * sqrt(L/C); f_lower_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) + 1/(2*Q_factor)); f_upper_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) - 1/(2*Q_factor)); % Transfer functions % Low-pass filter (RC) H_low = 1 ./ (1 + 1i * w *…arrow_forwardI would like to know the main features about the following three concepts: 1. Default forwarded 2. WINS Server 3. IP Security (IPSec).arrow_forward
- map the following ER diagram into a relational database schema diagram. you should take into account all the constraints in the ER diagram. Underline the primary key of each relation, and show each foreign key as a directed arrow from the referencing attributes (s) to the referenced relation. NOTE: Need relational database schema diagramarrow_forwardWhat is business intelligence? Share the Business intelligence (BI) tools you have used and explain what types of decisions you made.arrow_forwardI need help fixing the minor issue where the text isn't in the proper place, and to ensure that the frequency cutoff is at the right place. My code: % Define frequency range for the plot f = logspace(1, 5, 500); % Frequency range from 10 Hz to 100 kHz w = 2 * pi * f; % Angular frequency % Parameters for the filters - let's adjust these to get more reasonable cutoffs R = 1e3; % Resistance in ohms (1 kΩ) C = 1e-6; % Capacitance in farads (1 μF) % For bandpass, we need appropriate L value for desired cutoffs L = 0.1; % Inductance in henries - adjusted for better bandpass response % Calculate cutoff frequencies first to verify they're in desired range f_cutoff_RC = 1 / (2 * pi * R * C); f_resonance = 1 / (2 * pi * sqrt(L * C)); Q_factor = (1/R) * sqrt(L/C); f_lower_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) + 1/(2*Q_factor)); f_upper_cutoff = f_resonance / (sqrt(1 + 1/(4*Q_factor^2)) - 1/(2*Q_factor)); % Transfer functions % Low-pass filter (RC) H_low = 1 ./ (1 + 1i * w *…arrow_forward
- Task 3. i) Compare your results from Tasks 1 and 2. j) Repeat Tasks 1 and 2 for 500 and 5,000 elements. k) Summarize run-time results in the following table: Time/size n String StringBuilder 50 500 5,000arrow_forwardCan you please solve this without AIarrow_forward1. Create a Vehicle.java file. Implement the public Vehicle and Car classes in Vehicle.java, including all the variables and methods in the UMLS. Vehicle - make: String model: String -year: int + Vehicle(String make, String, model, int, year) + getMake(): String + setMake(String make): void + getModel(): String + setModel(String model): void + getYear(): int + set Year(int year): void +toString(): String Car - numDoors: int + numberOfCar: int + Car(String make, String, model, int, year, int numDoors) + getNumDoors(): int + setNumDoors (int num Doors): void + toString(): String 2. Create a CarTest.java file. Implement a public CarTest class with a main method. In the main method, create one Car object and print the object using System.out.println(). Then, print the numberOfCar. Your printing result must follow the example output: make Toyota, model=Camry, year=2022 numDoors=4 1 Hint: You need to modify the toString methods in the Car class and Vehicle class!arrow_forward
- CHATGPT GAVE ME WRONG ANSWER PLEASE HELParrow_forwardHELP CHAT GPT GAVE ME WRONG ANSWER Consider the following implementation of a container that will be used in a concurrent environment. The container is supposed to be used like an indexed array, but provide thread-safe access to elements. struct concurrent_container { // Assume it’s called for any new instance soon before it’s ever used void concurrent_container() { init_mutex(&lock); } ~concurrent_container() { destroy_mutex(&lock); } // Returns element by its index. int get(int index) { lock.acquire(); if (index < 0 || index >= size) { return -1; } int result = data[index]; lock.release(); return result; } // Sets element by its index. void set(int index, int value) { lock.acquire(); if (index < 0 || index >= size) { resize(size); } data[index] = value; lock.release(); } // Extend maximum capacity of the…arrow_forwardWrite a C program using embedded assembler in which you use your own function to multiply by two without using the product. Tip: Just remember that multiplying by two in binary means shifting the number one place to the left. You can use the sample program from the previous exercise as a basis, which increments a variable. Just replace the INC instruction with SHL.arrow_forward
- Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:CengageDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781305627482Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781285196145Author:Steven, Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel, Carlos, Coronel, Carlos; Morris, Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris, Steven Morris; Carlos CoronelPublisher:Cengage LearningA Guide to SQLComputer ScienceISBN:9781111527273Author:Philip J. PrattPublisher:Course Technology Ptr


