The reasons why the given conclusion cannot be true.
The reasons why the given conclusion cannot be true, have been provided.
Given:
The conclusion:
A hyperbola consists of two parabolas, one on each nappe.
Concept used:
Eccentricity is defined as the distance from any point on the
Calculation:
The eccentricity of parabolas is always
As discussed, eccentricity is defined as the distance from any point on the conic section to the focus divided by the perpendicular distance from that point to the nearest directrix.
This implies that any point on a parabola is equidistant from the focus and the directrix, while any point on a hyperbola is nearer to the directrix than to the focus.
Moreover, hyperbolas are asymptotic to straight lines, while parabolas have tangent at any angle (except parallel to the axis); which implies that parabolas are not asymptotic to any straight lines.
Thus, the given conclusion that a hyperbola consists of two parabolas, one on each nappe; cannot be true.
Conclusion:
The reasons why the given conclusion cannot be true, have been provided.
Chapter 8 Solutions
PRECALCULUS:GRAPHICAL,...-NASTA ED.
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781285741550Author:James StewartPublisher:Cengage LearningThomas' Calculus (14th Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134438986Author:Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. WeirPublisher:PEARSONCalculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134763644Author:William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric SchulzPublisher:PEARSON
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781319050740Author:Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert FranzosaPublisher:W. H. FreemanCalculus: Early Transcendental FunctionsCalculusISBN:9781337552516Author:Ron Larson, Bruce H. EdwardsPublisher:Cengage Learning