Pearson eText Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780135639221
Author: Jay Heizer, Barry Render
Publisher: PEARSON+
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 7.S, Problem 29P
a)
Summary Introduction
To determine: The break-even point in dollars for Proposal X.
b)
Summary Introduction
To determine: The break-even point in dollars for Proposal Y.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
b. What is the expected value for the rezoned apartments, if the rezoning cost is included (but land cost is excluded)?
Note: Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answers in millions rounded to 2 decimal places. Negative
amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.
Expected value
million
c. If the land is rezoned, what should the contractor decide?
O Build shopping center
O Build apartments
d. What is the expected revenue, if the land is not rezoned (excluding the land cost)?
Note: Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answers in millions rounded to 2 decimal places. Negative
amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.
Expected revenue
million
e. What is the expected net profit of entire project, including all applicable costs?
Note: Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answers in millions rounded to 2 decimal places. Negative
amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.
Expected net profit
million
Problem#1
Tom Schmid is thinking about buying a Nordic ski machine. The three factors important to him are price,
ease of use, and the ability to store the exercise equipment in a closet when he is done using it. Given the
following data, help Tom determine the best machine for him:
FACTOR WEIGHTS
FACTOR
IMPORTANCE WEIGHT
Price
0.9
Ease of use
Storage
0.75
0.6
FACTOR EVALUATIONS
FACTOR
PROFESSIONAL NORDIC SKIER
ECONO NORDIC SKIER
Price
0.5
0.8
Ease of use 0.95
0.6
Storage
0.9
0.7
During a major expansion in 2004, Douwalla’s Import Company developed a new processing line for which the delivered equipment cost was $1.75 million. This year, the board of directors decided to expand into new markets and expects to build the current version of the same line. Estimate the cost if the following factors are applicable: construction cost factor is 0.20, installation cost factor is 0.50, indirect cost factor applied against equipment is 0.25, and the total plant cost index has risen from 2509 to 3713 over the years.
Chapter 7 Solutions
Pearson eText Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
Ch. 7.S - Prob. 1DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 2DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 3DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 4DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 5DQCh. 7.S - Distinguish between bottleneck time and throughput...Ch. 7.S - Prob. 7DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 8DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 9DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 10DQ
Ch. 7.S - Prob. 11DQCh. 7.S - Prob. 12DQCh. 7.S - What are the techniques available to operations...Ch. 7.S - Amy Xias plant was designed to produce 7,000...Ch. 7.S - For the post month, the plant in Problem S7.1,...Ch. 7.S - Prob. 3PCh. 7.S - Prob. 4PCh. 7.S - Prob. 5PCh. 7.S - The effective capacity and efficiency for the next...Ch. 7.S - Southeastern Oklahoma State Universitys business...Ch. 7.S - Prob. 8PCh. 7.S - Prob. 9PCh. 7.S - Prob. 10PCh. 7.S - The three-station work cell illustrated in Figure...Ch. 7.S - The three-station work cell at Pullman Mfg., Inc....Ch. 7.S - The Pullman Mfg., Inc., three-station work cell...Ch. 7.S - Prob. 14PCh. 7.S - 10 minutes per unit. Part 2 is simultaneously...Ch. 7.S - Prob. 16PCh. 7.S - Prob. 17PCh. 7.S - Using the data in Problem S7.17: a) What is the...Ch. 7.S - Prob. 19PCh. 7.S - Prob. 20PCh. 7.S - Prob. 21PCh. 7.S - Prob. 22PCh. 7.S - Prob. 23PCh. 7.S - Prob. 24PCh. 7.S - Prob. 25PCh. 7.S - Prob. 26PCh. 7.S - Prob. 27PCh. 7.S - Prob. 28PCh. 7.S - Prob. 29PCh. 7.S - Prob. 30PCh. 7.S - Prob. 31PCh. 7.S - Prob. 32PCh. 7.S - Prob. 33PCh. 7.S - Prob. 34PCh. 7.S - Prob. 35PCh. 7.S - Prob. 36PCh. 7.S - Prob. 37PCh. 7.S - Prob. 38PCh. 7.S - Prob. 39PCh. 7.S - Prob. 40PCh. 7.S - Prob. 41PCh. 7.S - Prob. 42PCh. 7.S - Prob. 43PCh. 7.S - Prob. 44PCh. 7.S - Prob. 45PCh. 7.S - Prob. 1VCCh. 7.S - a capacity expansion plan and a new 11-story...Ch. 7.S - a capacity expansion plan and a new 11-story...Ch. 7 - Ethical Dilemma For the sake of efficiency and...Ch. 7 - Prob. 1DQCh. 7 - Prob. 2DQCh. 7 - Prob. 3DQCh. 7 - Prob. 4DQCh. 7 - Prob. 5DQCh. 7 - Prob. 6DQCh. 7 - Prob. 7DQCh. 7 - Prob. 8DQCh. 7 - Prob. 9DQCh. 7 - Prob. 10DQCh. 7 - Prob. 11DQCh. 7 - Prob. 12DQCh. 7 - Prob. 13DQCh. 7 - Prob. 14DQCh. 7 - Prob. 15DQCh. 7 - Prob. 16DQCh. 7 - Prob. 17DQCh. 7 - Prob. 18DQCh. 7 - Prob. 19DQCh. 7 - Prob. 1PCh. 7 - Usingthedatain Problem 7.1, determinethemost...Ch. 7 - Prob. 3PCh. 7 - Refer to Problem 7.1. If a contract for the second...Ch. 7 - Stan Fawcetts company is considering producing a...Ch. 7 - Prob. 6PCh. 7 - Prob. 7PCh. 7 - Prob. 8PCh. 7 - Metters Cabinets, Inc., needs to choose a...Ch. 7 - Prob. 10PCh. 7 - Nagle Electric. Inc., of Lincoln, Nebraska, must...Ch. 7 - Stapleton Manufacturing intends to increase...Ch. 7 - Prepare a flowchart for one of the following: a)...Ch. 7 - Prepare a process chart for one of the activities...Ch. 7 - Prob. 15PCh. 7 - Prob. 16PCh. 7 - Prob. 17PCh. 7 - Prob. 1CSCh. 7 - Prob. 2CSCh. 7 - Prob. 3CSCh. 7 - Process Strategy at Wheeled Coach Wheeled Coach,...Ch. 7 - Prob. 1.2VCCh. 7 - Prob. 1.3VCCh. 7 - Prob. 1.4VCCh. 7 - Alaska Airlines: 20-Minute Baggage...Ch. 7 - Prob. 2.2VCCh. 7 - Prob. 2.3VCCh. 7 - Prob. 2.4VCCh. 7 - Prob. 2.5VCCh. 7 - Prob. 3.1VCCh. 7 - Prob. 3.2VCCh. 7 - Prob. 3.3VCCh. 7 - Prob. 3.4VC
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- You work for the Brad's Nailer Company which manufactures three types of nailers: a pneumatic model, the "ProLine", and a cordless model. You have contracted to supply a national retail chain with all three models of nailers. However, Brad's nailer production capability is limited in three departments: production, testing, and packaging. The goal is to maximize your revenue. Your answer will be the number packaging hours to be produced (The number of nailers must be a whole number.) Use Scenario 2arrow_forwardSee picture for question details.arrow_forwardPreliminary plans are underway for construction of a new stadium for a major league baseball team. City officials question the number and profitability of the luxury corporate boxes planned for the upper deck of the stadium. Corporations and selected individuals may purchase a box for $300,000. The fixed construction cost for the upper-deck area is estimated to be $4,500,000, with a variable cost of $150,000 for each box constructed. a. What is the breakeven point for the number of luxury boxes in the new stadium? b. Preliminary drawings for the stadium show that space is available for the construction of up to 50 luxury boxes. Promoters indicate that buyers are available and that all 50 could be sold if constructed. What is your recommendation concerning the construction of luxury boxes? What profit is anticipated?arrow_forward
- The Ace Steel Mill estimates the demand for steel in millions of tons per year as follows:Millions of Tons Probability10 .1012 .2514 .3016 .2018 .15a. If capacity is set at 18 million tons, how much of a capacity cushion is there?b. What is the probability of idle capacity, and what is the average utilization of the plant at 18 million tons of capacity?c. If it costs $8 million per million tons of lost business and $80 million to build a million tons of capacity, how much capacity should be built to minimize total costs?arrow_forwardGiven is a decision payoff table and a Sub Decision Payoff Table. Use Minimax Regret as an evaluation criterion to evaluate alternatives. Alternatives Low Future Demand Moderate Small Facility 49 48 Medium Facility 46 47 Large Facility -12 112 47 Alternatives Small Facility Medium Facility Large Facility Worst Regrets ? ? ? a) The worst regrets for alternative Small Facility is Blank 1 b) The worst regrets for alternative Medium Facility is Blank 2 c) The worst regrets for alternative Large Facility is Blank 3 d) The best course of action or decision by using Minimax Regret is to select Blank 4 facility 47 ཆེ་ཆེ་བེ་རྡོ Higharrow_forwardGiven is a decision payoff table and a Sub Decision Payoff Table. Use Minimax Regret as an evaluation criterion to evaluate alternatives. Alternatives Low Future Demand Moderate High Small Facility 52 42 43 Medium Facility 50 49 49 Large Facility -15 38 Alternatives Small Facility Medium Facility Large Facility Worst Regrets ? ? ? a) The worst regrets for alternative Small Facility is Blank 1 b) The worst regrets for alternative Medium Facility is Blank 2 c) The worst regrets for alternative Large Facility is Blank 3 d) The best course of action or decision by using Minimax Regret is to select Blank 4 facility 51arrow_forward
- ABC company plans to produce a new line of laptop computers. Management wants to decide either to purchase keyboard for the new computers from an outside supplier or to manufacture them in the factory. If they buy from the supplier each keyboard will cost 100$. However, if they set up the assembly process required within the company it will cost an initial investment of $100,000. After the set up company can produce each keyboard in the factory for $75. Calculate the break-even point. Comment which option is better below and above the break-even point.arrow_forwardComputex is a new company in the computer field. The company has produced one product that has been marketed and want to develop a new graphical display terminal.Mr. Renap is the Chief Engineer and has developed two alternatives: First alternative : Conventional way and use existing facilities with little modification cost ($50000), and it will not be very different from existing terminals that are being marketed by other competitors. Second alternative: Radical departure from existing terminals in the market. Now it is January 2021 and if the company must decide now, the radical development of graphical terminal depends upon the development of a special display screen which itself depends on the quality of coating materials. Mr.Renap investigation of this new material leads him to believe that there is: 30% chance High-quality coating material 50% chance Medium-quality coating material 20% chance Low-quality coating material He will not know for sure except in six months from now,…arrow_forwardDawson Electronics is a manufacturer of high-tech control modules for lawn sprinkler systems. Denise, the CEO, is trying to decide if the company should develop one of the two potential new products, the Water Saver 1000 or the Greener Grass 5000. With each product, Dawson can capture a bigger market share if it chooses to expand capacity by buying additional machines. Given different demand scenarios, their probabilities of occurrence, and capacity expansion versus no change in capacity, the potential sale of each product are summarized in the included table. Click the icon to view the table. What is the expected payoff for the Water Saver 1000 and the Greener Grass 5000, with and without capacity expansion? The expected payoff for the Water Saver 1000 with the capacity expansion is $ integer.) The expected payoff for the Water Saver 1000 without the capacity expansion is $. (Enter your response as an integer.) ਗਿਆ (Enter your response as an The expected payoff for the Greener Grass…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Inventory Management | Concepts, Examples and Solved Problems; Author: Dr. Bharatendra Rai;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n9NLZTIlz8;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY