Concept explainers
a.
Draw the plots of the proportion of bird eggs hatching for the lowlands and mid-elevation areas versus exposure time.
Identify whether the shapes of the plots are as expected in case of “logistic” plots.
a.
Answer to Problem 71E
The plot of the proportion of bird eggs hatching for the lowlands and mid-elevation areas versus exposure time is as follows:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The given data relates the proportion of bird eggs hatching for the lowlands, mid-elevation areas and cloud-forests with exposure time (days).
Denote the proportion of hatching for lowlands as
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to draw the scatterplots using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple, and then click OK.
- Enter the column of p1 in the first cell under Y variables.
- Enter the column of x in the first cell under X variables.
- Enter the column of p2 in the second cell under Y variables.
- Enter the column of x in the second cell under X variables.
- Choose Multiple Graphs.
- Select Overlaid on the same graph under Show pairs of graph variables.
- Click OK in all dialogue boxes.
Thus, the scatterplot for the data is obtained.
The logistic plots usually have an approximate S-shaped distribution. In the above scatterplot, it is observed that both the proportions have approximately extended S-shaped distributions.
Hence, the shapes of the plots are more-or-less as expected in case of “logistic” plots.
b.
Find the value of
Fit a regression line of the form
Describe the significance of the negative slope.
b.
Answer to Problem 71E
The regression line fitted to the given data is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Logistic regression:
The logistic regression equation for the prediction of a probability for the given value of the explanatory variable, x, is
The values of
Data transformation
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to transform the data using MINITAB software is given below:
- Choose Calc > Calculator.
- Enter the column of y* under Store result in variable.
- Enter the formula LN(‘p3’/(1–‘p3’)) under Expression.
- Click OK.
The transformed variable is stored in the column y*.
Data display:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to display the data using MINITAB software is given as,
- Choose Data > Display Data.
- Under Column, constants, and matrices to display, enter the column of y*.
- Click OK on all dialogue boxes.
The output using MINITAB software is given as follows:
Regression equation:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain the regression equation using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Regression > Regression > Fit Regression Model.
- Enter the column of y* under Responses.
- Enter the columns of x under Continuous predictors.
- Choose Results and select Analysis of Variance, Model Summary, Coefficients, Regression Equation.
- Click OK in all dialogue boxes.
Output obtained using MINITAB is given below:
In the output, substituting
It is observed that the slope of x is –0.5872, which is negative. A negative slope implies that an increase in x causes a decrease in yꞌ.
Now, it is known that the quantity
In this case, an increase in exposure time decreases the natural logarithm of odds of hatching in the cloud forest area, which, in turn, implies a decrease in the odds of hatching.
Thus, the negative slope implies that an increase in exposure time causes a decrease in the odds of hatching of an egg in the cloud forest area.
c.
Predict the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions, for an exposure time of 3 days.
Predict the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions, for an exposure time of 5 days.
c.
Answer to Problem 71E
The proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions, for an exposure time of 3 days is 0.4382.
The proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions, for an exposure time of 5 days is 0.1942.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
For an exposure time of 3 days, substitute
Thus,
Thus, the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions, for an exposure time of 3 days is 0.4382.
For an exposure time of 5 days, substitute
Thus,
Thus, the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions, for an exposure time of 5 days is 0.1942.
d.
Identify the point of exposure time, at which, the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions changes from greater than 0.5 to less than 0.5.
d.
Answer to Problem 71E
The exposure time, at which, the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions changes from greater than 0.5 to less than 0.5 is 2.5766 days.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
For the proportion of hatching of 0.5, substitute
Thus,
As a result, the exposure time for the proportion of hatching of 0.5 is 2.5766 days.
Now, from the explanation in Part b, an increase in the exposure time causes a decrease in the odds of hatching in the cloud forest conditions. Thus, an increase in exposure time from 2.5766 days would cause a decrease in the proportion of hatching, whereas a decrease in exposure time from 2.5766 days would cause an increase in the proportion of hatching.
Thus, the exposure time, at which, the proportion of hatching in the cloud forest conditions changes from greater than 0.5 to less than 0.5 is 2.5766 days.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis
- 26. A certain system can experience three different types of defects. Let A;(i = 1,2,3) denote the event that the sys- tem has a defect of type i. Suppose thatP(A1) = .12 P(A) = .07 P(A) = .05P(A, U A2) = .13P(A, U A3) = .14P(A2 U A3) = .10P(A, A2 A3) = .011Rshelfa. What is the probability that the system does not havea type 1 defect?b. What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects?c. What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects but not a type 3 defect? d. What is the probability that the system has at most two of these defects?arrow_forwardThe following are suggested designs for group sequential studies. Using PROCSEQDESIGN, provide the following for the design O’Brien Fleming and Pocock.• The critical boundary values for each analysis of the data• The expected sample sizes at each interim analysisAssume the standardized Z score method for calculating boundaries.Investigators are evaluating the success rate of a novel drug for treating a certain type ofbacterial wound infection. Since no existing treatment exists, they have planned a one-armstudy. They wish to test whether the success rate of the drug is better than 50%, whichthey have defined as the null success rate. Preliminary testing has estimated the successrate of the drug at 55%. The investigators are eager to get the drug into production andwould like to plan for 9 interim analyses (10 analyzes in total) of the data. Assume thesignificance level is 5% and power is 90%.Besides, draw a combined boundary plot (OBF, POC, and HP)arrow_forwardPlease provide the solution for the attached image in detailed.arrow_forward
- 20 km, because GISS Worksheet 10 Jesse runs a small business selling and delivering mealie meal to the spaza shops. He charges a fixed rate of R80, 00 for delivery and then R15, 50 for each packet of mealle meal he delivers. The table below helps him to calculate what to charge his customers. 10 20 30 40 50 Packets of mealie meal (m) Total costs in Rands 80 235 390 545 700 855 (c) 10.1. Define the following terms: 10.1.1. Independent Variables 10.1.2. Dependent Variables 10.2. 10.3. 10.4. 10.5. Determine the independent and dependent variables. Are the variables in this scenario discrete or continuous values? Explain What shape do you expect the graph to be? Why? Draw a graph on the graph provided to represent the information in the table above. TOTAL COST OF PACKETS OF MEALIE MEAL 900 800 700 600 COST (R) 500 400 300 200 100 0 10 20 30 40 60 NUMBER OF PACKETS OF MEALIE MEALarrow_forwardLet X be a random variable with support SX = {−3, 0.5, 3, −2.5, 3.5}. Part ofits probability mass function (PMF) is given bypX(−3) = 0.15, pX(−2.5) = 0.3, pX(3) = 0.2, pX(3.5) = 0.15.(a) Find pX(0.5).(b) Find the cumulative distribution function (CDF), FX(x), of X.1(c) Sketch the graph of FX(x).arrow_forwardA well-known company predominantly makes flat pack furniture for students. Variability with the automated machinery means the wood components are cut with a standard deviation in length of 0.45 mm. After they are cut the components are measured. If their length is more than 1.2 mm from the required length, the components are rejected. a) Calculate the percentage of components that get rejected. b) In a manufacturing run of 1000 units, how many are expected to be rejected? c) The company wishes to install more accurate equipment in order to reduce the rejection rate by one-half, using the same ±1.2mm rejection criterion. Calculate the maximum acceptable standard deviation of the new process.arrow_forward
- 5. Let X and Y be independent random variables and let the superscripts denote symmetrization (recall Sect. 3.6). Show that (X + Y) X+ys.arrow_forward8. Suppose that the moments of the random variable X are constant, that is, suppose that EX" =c for all n ≥ 1, for some constant c. Find the distribution of X.arrow_forward9. The concentration function of a random variable X is defined as Qx(h) = sup P(x ≤ X ≤x+h), h>0. Show that, if X and Y are independent random variables, then Qx+y (h) min{Qx(h). Qr (h)).arrow_forward
- 10. Prove that, if (t)=1+0(12) as asf->> O is a characteristic function, then p = 1.arrow_forward9. The concentration function of a random variable X is defined as Qx(h) sup P(x ≤x≤x+h), h>0. (b) Is it true that Qx(ah) =aQx (h)?arrow_forward3. Let X1, X2,..., X, be independent, Exp(1)-distributed random variables, and set V₁₁ = max Xk and W₁ = X₁+x+x+ Isk≤narrow_forward
- Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:CengageFunctions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill