Computer Science: An Overview (12th Edition)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780133760064
Author: Glenn Brookshear, Dennis Brylow
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 24CRP
Program Plan Intro
Production system:
Production system consists of condition-action rules, a
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
find the suitable term for the following sentences are the type of quantifiers, which express that the statement within its scope is true for at least one instance of something.
Choose... is someone who is capable of designing, building and testing an expert system
Choose... is a knowledgeable and skilled person capable of solving problems in a specific area or domain
Choose... is a symbol of logical representation, which specifies that the statement within its range is true for everything or every instance of a particular thing
In "Computing Machines and Intelligence," the English mathematician Alan Turing (1912-1954) wrote,
"If each man had a definite set of rules of conduct by which he regulated his life, he would be a machine, but there are no such rules, so men cannot be machines."
Using what you now know about Logic, determine whether this statement make sense and explain. Construct a truth table for Turing's statement and determine if this statement is a tautology.
1. Given the following, can you prove the unicorn is mythical? How about Magi-
cal? and Horned? (adapted from Barwise and Etchemendy (1993)).
if the unicorn is mythical, then it is immortal, but if it is not mythical,
then it is a mortal mammal. If the unicorn is either immortal or a
mammal, then it is horned. The unicorn is magical if it is horned.
2. Which of the following are correct?
(a) False E True
(b) (A A B) E (A + B)
(c) A + BEAVB
(d) A + BE¬AV B
(e) (A V B) ^ (¬A V B) is satisfiable
Chapter 11 Solutions
Computer Science: An Overview (12th Edition)
Ch. 11.1 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.1 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.1 - Prob. 3QECh. 11.1 - Prob. 4QECh. 11.1 - Prob. 5QECh. 11.2 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.2 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.2 - Prob. 3QECh. 11.2 - Prob. 4QECh. 11.2 - Identify the ambiguities involved in translating...
Ch. 11.2 - Prob. 6QECh. 11.2 - Prob. 7QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 3QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 4QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 5QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 6QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 7QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 8QECh. 11.3 - Prob. 9QECh. 11.4 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.4 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.4 - Prob. 3QECh. 11.4 - Prob. 4QECh. 11.4 - Prob. 5QECh. 11.5 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.5 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.5 - Prob. 3QECh. 11.5 - Prob. 4QECh. 11.6 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.6 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.6 - Prob. 3QECh. 11.7 - Prob. 1QECh. 11.7 - Prob. 2QECh. 11.7 - Prob. 3QECh. 11 - Prob. 1CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 2CRPCh. 11 - Identify each of the following responses as being...Ch. 11 - Prob. 4CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 5CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 6CRPCh. 11 - Which of the following activities do you expect to...Ch. 11 - Prob. 8CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 9CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 10CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 11CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 12CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 13CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 14CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 15CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 16CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 17CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 18CRPCh. 11 - Give an example in which the closed-world...Ch. 11 - Prob. 20CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 21CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 22CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 23CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 24CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 25CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 26CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 27CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 28CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 29CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 30CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 31CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 32CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 33CRPCh. 11 - What heuristic do you use when searching for a...Ch. 11 - Prob. 35CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 36CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 37CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 38CRPCh. 11 - Suppose your job is to supervise the loading of...Ch. 11 - Prob. 40CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 41CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 42CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 43CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 44CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 45CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 46CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 47CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 48CRPCh. 11 - Draw a diagram similar to Figure 11.5 representing...Ch. 11 - Prob. 50CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 51CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 52CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 53CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 54CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 55CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 56CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 57CRPCh. 11 - Prob. 1SICh. 11 - Prob. 2SICh. 11 - Prob. 3SICh. 11 - Prob. 4SICh. 11 - Prob. 5SICh. 11 - Prob. 6SICh. 11 - Prob. 7SICh. 11 - Prob. 8SICh. 11 - Prob. 9SICh. 11 - Prob. 10SICh. 11 - Prob. 11SICh. 11 - Prob. 12SICh. 11 - A GPS in an automobile provides a friendly voice...Ch. 11 - Prob. 14SI
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Need the right answer among choices and also an explanation of the answer.arrow_forwarda) Determine which amounts of postage can be formed using just 3-cent and 11-cent stamps. b) Using the technique done in class, prove your answer to (a) using the principle of strong induction. Make sure you specify Pen and its domain. SHOW ALL STEPS AND WORKarrow_forwardPlease provide an answer for attached question.arrow_forward
- Consider how Descartes and his method(s) may be applied to a IT Major student. Consider his four moral rules and norms. Are any of these benefits to one's life. Please explain briefly in your perspective in 5 to 6 paragraphs. reference - Descartes, Discourse on Methodarrow_forwardThe foundation of formal approaches is logic. Propositional and predicate logics are the most common conceptual frameworks. An student in discrete mathematics is looking for propositional and predicate logics to use in software testing. Don't leave this student hanging, please. Justify your stance on the rationale and software testing's pros and downsides. How can official plans be checked? So, which is preferable?arrow_forwardUrgent.Please solve this question with using Prolog Programming Language.arrow_forward
- Formal techniques depend on solid reasoning. Propositional logic and Predicate Logic are the most prevalent logics in terms of their essential notions. An undergraduate in discrete mathematics wants to know how propositional and predicate logics are used in software quality assurance. This objective requires you to assist a student. Comparing each logic's pros and cons and how they apply to software testing is one way. How should software be formal verified, and which logic is best?arrow_forwardSolve the following puzzle by translating statements into logical expressions and reasoning fromthese expressions.Four friends have been identified as suspects for an unauthorized access into a computer system.They have made statements to the investigating authorities.1-Alice said Carlos did it.2-John said I did not do it.3-Carlos said Diana did it.4-Diana said Carlos lied when he said that I did it.If the authorities also know that exactly one of the four suspects is telling the truth, who didit?arrow_forwardplease refer to the images thanksarrow_forward
- For this question about predicate logic, please note that, even though the 'nonsense' words are only nouns and verbs, you do not need to know the meaning of the words being used in order to answer this question. Consider a universe of discourse that contains (among other things) all gudgeons. If the predicates B(x), C(x), and G(x) represented the assertions x brabbles, x corrades, and x groaks, respectively, then which of the following would be an accurate translation of the following assertion? some gudgeons do not brabble even though they corrade and groak Select one: (-B(=) ^ C(z) ^ G(x)) O none of these options (-B(2) v C(x) V G(=)) O Vz (-B(x) ^ C(2) V G(z) O I (¬B(x) V C(x) ^ G(x)) (-B(2) ^ C(x) V G(=)) (-B(=) ^ C(x) V G(=) O Frarrow_forwardUse De Morgan’s Laws, and any other logical equivalence facts you know to simplify the followingstatements. Show all your steps. Your final statements should have negations only appear directly nextto the sentence variables (P, Q, etc.), and no double negations. It would be a good idea to use onlyconjunctions, disjunctions, and negations.(a) ¬((¬P ∧ Q) ∨ ¬(R ∨ ¬Q)).(b) ¬((¬P → ¬Q) ∧ (¬Q → R)) (careful with the implications).(c) For both parts above, verify your answers are correct using truth tables. That is, use a truth tableto check that the given statement and your proposed simplification are actually logically equivalent.arrow_forwardFor this question about predicate logic, please note that, even though the 'nonsense' words are only nouns and verbs, you do not need to know the meaning of the words being used in order to answer this question. Consider a universe of discourse that contains (among other things) all gudgeons. If the predicates K(x), G(x), and J(x) represented the assertions x kenchs, x groaks, and x jargogles, respectively, then which of the following would be an accurate translation of the following assertion? if any gudgeon kenchs or that gudgeon does not groak then that gudgeon does not jargogle Select one: ((K(=) v G(2) → J(=) IE O (K(e)v -G(=) O Væ V → ¬J(x) (K(=) ^ -G(2)) → ¬J(x) TE O → ¬J(x) O none of these options (Ke)v -G(=) O Va V V ¬J(x) (K(2) V -G(2) v V ¬J(x)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Database System ConceptsComputer ScienceISBN:9780078022159Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. SudarshanPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780134444321Author:Tony GaddisPublisher:PEARSON
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780132737968Author:Thomas L. FloydPublisher:PEARSON
C How to Program (8th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780133976892Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey DeitelPublisher:PEARSON
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337627900Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Programmable Logic ControllersComputer ScienceISBN:9780073373843Author:Frank D. PetruzellaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780134444321
Author:Tony Gaddis
Publisher:PEARSON
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780132737968
Author:Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:PEARSON
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780133976892
Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:PEARSON
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337627900
Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:9780073373843
Author:Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education