To develop a well-researched report analyzing J. Richard Hackman's comment on using teams to complete complex projects, we will follow the 3x3 writing process, focusing on the prewriting phase. The first steps of the prewriting process include: 1. Understanding the Prompt: We will carefully read and comprehend Hackman's comment to ensure a clear understanding of his perspective on using teams for complex projects. 2. Gathering Information: We will conduct thorough research on Hackman's work, including reviewing his publications, scholarly articles, and any relevant studies or experiments he has conducted. This step will help us gather comprehensive information about his views on team effectiveness. 3. Organizing Ideas: Once we have gathered the necessary information, we will organize our thoughts and ideas in a structured manner. This will involve creating an outline that outlines the main points and arguments we want to address in the report. The purpose of this report is to critically analyze Hackman's comment and provide an objective evaluation of the effectiveness of using teams to complete complex projects. We aim to achieve the following objectives with this report: 1. Provide a comprehensive understanding of Hackman's perspective on team effectiveness in complex projects. 2. Assess the validity of Hackman's comment based on existing research and evidence. 3. Explore alternative viewpoints and theories on team effectiveness in complex projects. 4. Present recommendations and insights for organizations that heavily rely on teams for project completion. The appropriate tone for this report should be objective, informative, and analytical. We want to maintain a professional tone throughout the document to ensure credibility and convey the seriousness of the topic. While the tone should be formal, we can also make the report engaging by incorporating conversational elements. To achieve a positive tone in the report, we can employ the following techniques: 1. Use of Clear and Concise Language: We will strive to use simple and straightforward language to ensure clarity and ease of understanding for the readers. 2. Empathy and Consideration: We will acknowledge the potential benefits and drawbacks of using teams for complex projects, addressing both sides of the argument with empathy and understanding. 3. Respectful Language: We will use respectful and courteous language throughout the report, ensuring that our analysis remains unbiased and professional. 4. Balanced Presentation: We will present a balanced view of Hackman's comment, providing counterarguments and alternative perspectives to promote fairness and objectivity. Example of making the report conversational and professional: "While Hackman's comment raises concerns about the effectiveness of using teams for complex projects, it is important to delve deeper into the research to gain a comprehensive understanding of this topic. Let's explore the various factors influencing team effectiveness and analyze the validity of Hackman's viewpoint." Example of making the report courteous: "We appreciate Hackman's valuable contribution to the field of team research. In this report, we aim to respectfully evaluate his comment on the applicability of teams in complex projects, considering both the potential advantages and limitations of this approach." Example of making the report bias-free: "Our analysis will be conducted in an unbiased manner, considering multiple perspectives and empirical evidence. We will critically evaluate Hackman's comment, taking into account alternative viewpoints and research findings to provide a well-rounded assessment." Example of making the report precise and vigorous: "Through a meticulous examination of Hackman's comment, we will rigorously assess the theoretical foundations and empirical evidence supporting his claim. Our report will strive to provide precise insights and recommendations for organizations seeking to optimize project completion strategies."