5CO02 LEARNER ASSESSMENT BRIEF JUNE 22 ANAS (1)

docx

School

Oakwood University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2

Subject

Management

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

35

Uploaded by Aliriyadh

Report
5CO02 Evidence-based practice Learner Assessment Brief Assessment ID / CIPD_5CO02_22_01 Level 5 Associate Diploma in People Management Organisational Learning and Development
Version 1- June 2022 2 Level 5 Associate Diploma Please write clearly in block capitals. Centre number: 8 7 5 Cente name: Oakwood International Learner number (1st 7 digits of CIPD Membership number): 8 5 2 9 5 4 0 Learner surname: Alajlan Learner other names: Anas Unit code: 5CO02 Unit title: Evidenced-based practice Assessment ID: CIPD_5CO02_22_01 Assessment start date: Assessment submission date: 21-Mar-2023 First resubmission date for centre marking – if applicable Second resubmission date for centre marking – if applicable Declared word count 3,974 words Assessor name (1 ST Submission): Assessor electronic signature: Assessor name (2 nd Submission) Assessor electronic signature: Assessor name (3 rd Submission) Assessor electronic signature: IQA name (if applicable): IQA signature (if applicable):
5CO02 Evidence-based practice This unit assignment addresses the significance of capturing robust quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform meaningful insight to influence critical thinking. It focuses on analysing evidence through an ethical lens to improve decision-making and how measuring the impact of people practice is essential in creating value. CIPD’s insight The Profession Map – Evidence-based practice More, now than ever, people professionals are taking an evidence-based approach to their work, using organisation data, research, stakeholder insights and perspectives as well as professional expertise to deliver work that’s impactful. Evidence-based practice is, quite simply, taking an evidence-based approach to your work: using the right data and the right information in a structured way, to inform the decisions you take and the work that you do, because it leads to better outcomes. This area of the Profession Map focuses on the knowledge required to take this evidence-based approach. It covers an understanding of evidence-based practice itself, as well as how to analyse and solve problems in order to understand the business problem that needs resolving. It also includes knowledge of how to use evidence in your work, such as using and commissioning research, using date and analytics, and exploring stakeholder needs and concerns. https://peopleprofession.cipd.org/profession-map/core-knowledge/analytics-creating-value Evidence-based practice for effective decision- making (April 2022). At the heart of evidence-based practice is the idea that good decision-making is achieved through critical thinking and drawing on the best available evidence. Evidence- based practice leads to decisions and actions that are more likely to have the desire effect and are less reliant on anecdotes, received wisdom and personal experience – sources that are not trustworthy on their own. Evidence-based HR practice draws together published research and people analytics with professional expertise and stakeholder opinions. https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/strategy/analytics/evidence-based-practice-factsheet Please note that the purpose of this insight is to link you to CIPD’s research and evidence within the subject area, so that you can engage with the latest thinking. It is not provided to replace the study required as part of the learning or as formative assessment material. Version 1- June 2022 3 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Preparation for the Tasks: At the start of your assignment, you are encouraged to plan your assessment work with your Assessor and where appropriate agree milestones so that they can help you monitor your progress. Refer to the indicative content in the unit to guide and support your evidence. Pay attention to how your evidence is presented, remember you are working in the People Practice Team. Ensure that the evidence generated for this assessment remains your own work. You will also benefit from: Completing and acting on formative feedback from your Assessor. Reflecting on your own experiences of learning opportunities and continuous professional development. Reading the CIPD Insight, Fact Sheets and related online material on these topics as well as key research authors on the subject. Your evidence must consist of: Task one-Report (2900 words) IMPORTANT NOTE: At Associate Level Referencing is mandatory – you must provide a reference where you have drawn from a secondary source; Harvard referencing is preferable. Please use the Reference box provided to record all of your long references. Short references should be included within the narrative. Upload the completed Learner Assessment brief, with both tasks completed, through the Assignments option in the Oakwood Learner Hub. Version 1- June 2022 4 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Scenario Your company is planning its forthcoming annual development event and the topic that the people practice team will be showcasing is evidence-based practice. In readiness for this event your manager has asked you to complete two tasks. Task One – Report Your first task is to write a report which provides the audience with an understanding of what evidence- based practice is and the strategies that can be taken for effective critical thinking and decision-making, you must ensure that you: Provide evaluation of the concept of evidence-based practice and assess how evidence-based practice approaches can be used to provide insight in supporting sound decision-making and judgments for people practitioners across a range of people practices and organisational issues. (AC 1.1) Provide evaluation of one appropriate analysis tool and one method that might be applied by organisations to recognise and diagnose current and future issues, challenges, and opportunities. (AC 1.2) Explain the main principles of critical thinking and describe how these might apply to individual and work colleagues’ ideas to assist objective and rationale debate. (AC 1.3) Explain a range of decision-making processes that can be applied to ensure that effective outcomes are achieved. (AC 1.4) Assess a range of different ethical theories and perspectives and explain how understanding of these can be used to inform and influence moral decision-making. (AC 1.5) Appraise different ways and approaches organisations can take to measure financial and non- financial performance. (AC 3.1) Explain how people practices add value in an organisation and identify a range of methods that might be used to measure the impact of a range of people practices (AC 3.2) You should relate to academic concepts, theories and professional practice throughout your report to ensure that your work is critical and informed by using key academic texts, articles and relevant publications. All cited references used should be correctly acknowledged and presented in full in a bibliography at the end of your report. Version 1- June 2022 5 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Task One Report You are required to prepare a report to senior managers at their forthcoming annual meeting. The report needs to: Evaluate the concept of evidence-based practice including how it can be applied to decision-making in people practice. (AC1.1) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 450 words. The concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely recognized as a valuable approach to decision- making in healthcare and other fields. EBP emphasizes the use of rigorous research and data to inform decisions, rather than relying solely on intuition or tradition (Panneer et al., 2020). This can lead to more effective and efficient outcomes, as well as improved patient satisfaction and outcomes. In the field of people practice, EBP can be used to inform a wide range of decisions and judgments. For example, EBP can be used to inform the design and implementation of employee training programs by identifying the most effective methods and materials based on research. It can also be used to evaluate the effectiveness of different management strategies and identify areas for improvement. EBP can also inform decision-making around employee engagement and retention by identifying the factors that have been shown to be most important in these areas (Persis et al., 2021). Another important aspect of implementing evidence-based practice in people practices is ensuring that the evidence used is of high quality and relevant to the specific context and population. This means that practitioners must be able to critically evaluate the research, consider the potential biases and limitations, and determine whether the findings are applicable to their specific situation. It is also important to use a combination of different types of evidence, such as quantitative and qualitative research, as well as expert opinion and stakeholder perspectives, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the issue at hand ( Kawar et al., 2023 ). This helps to ensure that decisions are informed by a range of perspectives and evidence, rather than relying on a single source or study. EBP can also be used to identify and address disparities in employee performance or outcomes. For example, by analyzing data on employee performance, organizations can identify patterns and trends that may be related to factors such as race, gender, or other demographic characteristics. By understanding these patterns, organizations can take steps to address any disparities and promote equity in the workplace. However, it is important to note that while evidence-based practice can provide valuable insight and support, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. In some cases, research may not exist or be inconclusive on a particular topic, and in such scenarios, practitioners must rely on their expertise and judgement. Additionally, EBP should be integrated with other decision-making frameworks such as ethics and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) considerations. Implementing EBP in people practices also requires a culture of continuous learning and improvement. It requires organizations to be open to new ideas and evidence, and to be willing to adapt and change their practices as new evidence becomes available. This can be challenging, but it is essential for organizations that want to stay competitive and provide the best possible outcomes for their employees. Organizations also need to invest in building the capability and skills of their people practitioners to be able to identify, critically evaluate and apply evidence in their practice (Khurana et al., 2021). The concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely recognized as a valuable approach to decision- making in various fields, including healthcare and people practice. EBP emphasizes the integration of rigorous research and data to inform decisions, moving away from reliance solely on intuition or tradition (Panneer et al., 2020). This thoughtful integration of evidence can lead to more effective and efficient Version 1- June 2022 6 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
outcomes, as well as improved satisfaction and results for individuals and organizations. EBP holds immense potential in guiding a range of decisions and judgments as regards people practice. One notable advantage of EBP in people practice is its ability to inform the design and implementation of employee training programs. By tapping into research-based evidence, practitioners can identify the most effective methods and materials that align with the unique needs of their workforce. This evidence-driven approach ensures that training initiatives are tailored for optimal impact and employee growth. Similarly, EBP offers valuable insights into evaluating the effectiveness of different management strategies. Organizations can assess the merits and drawbacks of various approaches, empowering them to make informed choices and adjustments that are aligned with the research evidence. Consequently, this evidence-based evaluation fosters an environment of continuous improvement, elevating the overall performance and efficiency of the organization. When tackling issues pertaining to employee engagement and retention, EBP plays a critical role in identifying the most influential factors. By examining well-established evidence, practitioners can recognize the elements that contribute significantly to engagement and retention rates. This enables organizations to implement targeted interventions that cultivate a positive work environment, foster employee growth, and bolster overall satisfaction within the workforce (Persis et al., 2021). However, while EBP is highly valuable, it comes with certain challenges and limitations. In some instances, the availability of research may be limited or inconclusive, necessitating practitioners to rely on their expertise and judgment to fill the gaps. Moreover, the integration of EBP in people practice requires a careful balance with other decision-making frameworks, considering ethical considerations, and embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) principles to ensure equitable practices. Learning and Development (L&D) and Reward systems stand as prominent examples of specific people practice issues. For L&D, evidence can be drawn from research on effective learning methodologies, the impact of training on employee performance, and factors that enhance knowledge retention. By incorporating this evidence, organizations can design L&D programs that cater to diverse learning styles and promote continuous growth and development among employees. Likewise, in devising reward systems, evidence can be gathered from research examining the relationship between rewards, motivation, and productivity. By leveraging such evidence, organizations can design reward structures that inspire and incentivize desired behaviors, fostering a more engaged and productive workforce. Finally, addressing an organizational issue, such as low productivity, necessitates a judicious application of EBP. Through an in-depth analysis of research on organizational behavior, employee satisfaction, and work environment factors, organizations can uncover the root causes contributing to low productivity. Armed with this evidence, they can implement targeted interventions and organizational adjustments to foster a more conducive work setting and elevate productivity levels (Khurana et al., 2021) . Evaluate a range of analysis tools and methods including how they can be applied to diagnose organisational issues, challenges and opportunities. (AC1.2) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. One appropriate analysis tool that organizations might use to recognize and diagnose current and future issues, challenges, and opportunities is a SWOT analysis (Benzaghta et al., 2021). SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool that helps organizations identify their internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. By conducting a SWOT analysis, organizations can gain a better understanding of their internal capabilities and limitations, and identify areas where they may be at a competitive advantage or disadvantage. Additionally, SWOT analysis can help organizations identify new opportunities and potential areas of growth, as well as potential threats to their business. In terms of implementation, SWOT analysis is relatively easy to conduct and can be done by a small team within the organization, it is also important to conduct a SWOT analysis on a regular basis, to ensure that the organization stays up-to-date with the latest trends and changes in the environment. In terms of implementation, SWOT analysis can be conducted through a series of meetings or workshops where a small team within the organization, such as managers and key staff, identify and evaluate the internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats. It is important to conduct a SWOT Version 1- June 2022 7 Level 5 Associate Diploma
analysis on a regular basis, to ensure that the organization stays up-to-date with the latest trends and changes in the environment. One method that organizations might apply to recognize and diagnose current and future issues, challenges, and opportunities is a stakeholder analysis. A stakeholder analysis is a process of identifying and assessing the interests and influences of different groups or individuals who have a stake in the organization. By conducting a stakeholder analysis, organizations can gain a better understanding of the different perspectives and priorities of different stakeholders, and identify areas where their interests align or conflict (Varvasovszkyet al., 2000). This method is particularly useful for organizations as it helps them to consider the impact of their decisions on different groups of people, by understanding their different needs and expectations. Additionally, by identifying the stakeholders with the most influence and the most at stake, organizations can anticipate and manage potential issues and challenges, and identify opportunities for collaboration and partnership. Stakeholder analysis can be conducted through a combination of methods such as surveys, interviews, and focus groups. It is important to involve a diverse range of stakeholders in the process, and to consider different perspectives and priorities to gain a comprehensive understanding of the stakeholders' needs and expectations. One macro tool that organizations can use to recognize and diagnose current and future issues, challenges, and opportunities is the PESTLE analysis. PESTLE stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. This tool helps organizations understand the external macro-environmental factors that could impact their operations (Munikanond et al., 2023). Political factors involve government policies, stability, and regulations that can affect the organization's strategies. Economic factors include economic growth, inflation, and exchange rates that may influence financial decisions. Social factors consider cultural trends, demographics, and societal values that affect consumer behavior and market demands. Technological factors encompass advancements and innovations that impact business processes and competitiveness. Legal factors involve laws and regulations that organizations must comply with, ensuring ethical and legal practices. Environmental factors consider ecological aspects, such as sustainability and climate change, affecting corporate responsibility and reputation. PESTLE analysis provides a comprehensive view of the external factors impacting the organization, enabling strategic planning and risk management. However, it may not delve deep into specific issues and challenges faced by the organization internally. It is also limited by the dynamic nature of external factors that can change rapidly. For micro tools, one method that organizations can apply is observation. Through direct observation of work processes, employee behavior, and customer interactions, organizations can gain valuable insights into potential issues, bottlenecks, and opportunities for improvement. Observations can be conducted by trained personnel or managers, providing a first-hand understanding of how the organization operates in real-life scenarios. Observation offers real-time data and a detailed understanding of processes and behaviors. It allows organizations to identify inefficiencies and potential solutions directly. However, observation may suffer from observer bias, and some aspects of the organization's functioning might be challenging to observe objectively. Another micro tool that organizations can utilize is conducting exit interviews. When employees leave the organization, exit interviews can be conducted to understand their reasons for departure, their perceptions of the work environment, and areas of improvement within the organization (Malik et al., 2023). Exit interviews can help identify potential challenges and areas that need attention to enhance employee satisfaction and retention. Exit interviews provide valuable feedback from departing employees, allowing organizations to address underlying issues and improve retention strategies. Yet, exit interviews may not capture the perspectives of current employees who might hesitate to share their concerns openly, and the feedback could be subjective based on individual experiences. Version 1- June 2022 8 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others’ ideas. (AC1.3) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. Critical thinking is an essential skill that allows individuals to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information in order to make sound judgments and decisions. The main principles of critical thinking include objectivity, analytical, logical, reflective and skeptical thinking (Duchscher, 1999). When applied to individual and work colleagues' ideas, these principles can assist in objective and rationale debate. Objectivity is the ability to consider different perspectives and evidence without bias or preconceptions. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to consider different perspectives and evidence objectively, without being influenced by their own preconceptions or biases. This allows individuals to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different ideas, and make more informed decisions based on the best available evidence Analytical thinking is the ability to break down complex information into smaller parts in order to understand it more fully. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to analyze and break down complex ideas, in order to identify potential flaws or limitations (Duchscher, 1999). By doing so, individuals can gain a better understanding of the ideas and be able to provide constructive feedback that can help to improve the quality of ideas and decision-making. Logical thinking is the ability to reason and make connections between different pieces of information. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to reason and make logical connections between different pieces of information, in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different ideas. This allows individuals to make more informed decisions based on the best available evidence. Reflective thinking is the ability to evaluate one's own thought process and assumptions. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to evaluate their own thought process and assumptions, in order to identify any biases or blind spots that may be influencing their thinking. By doing so, individuals can ensure that their ideas are well-supported and evidence-based (Duchscher, 1999). Finally, skeptical thinking is the ability to question assumptions and evidence, and to seek out additional information to support or refute a claim. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to question assumptions and seek out additional information to support or refute a claim. By doing so, individuals can ensure that their ideas are well-supported and evidence-based. By applying these principles, individuals and colleagues can engage in more objective and rational debate, and make more informed decisions based on the best available evidence. These principles of critical thinking can also be used to evaluate the ideas of others, and to provide constructive feedback that can help to improve the quality of ideas and decision-making. Critical thinking is an essential cognitive skill that empowers individuals to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information to arrive at well-founded judgments and decisions. The principles of critical thinking include objectivity, analytical thinking, logical reasoning, reflective assessment, and skeptical inquiry (Heard et al., 2020). These principles play a significant role in shaping the quality of our ideas and facilitating rational and objective debates. Objectivity is a fundamental principle that encourages individuals to examine ideas without being swayed by personal biases or preconceived notions. When applying critical thinking to my own ideas at work, I strive to detach myself from any emotional attachment to the idea and consider it from multiple perspectives. For example, when proposing a new marketing strategy for a product launch, I consciously sought feedback from diverse team members, encouraging them to express their candid opinions. By doing so, I could identify potential flaws in my initial idea and refine it based on the collective insights of my colleagues. In a recent team meeting, a colleague presented an ambitious plan to streamline the production process by adopting new technology. I applied critical thinking by engaging in analytical assessment. I broke Version 1- June 2022 9 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
down the proposal into its components, examining the potential benefits and drawbacks. I also evaluated the feasibility and compatibility with our existing infrastructure. By adopting analytical thinking, I was able to contribute valuable feedback to my colleague, addressing certain logistical challenges and suggesting areas for further research before implementation. Another vital principle of critical thinking is logical reasoning, which involves making connections between different pieces of information to discern patterns or identify gaps in reasoning (Willingham, 2019). During a brainstorming session, a colleague proposed a new product design that aimed to revolutionize the user experience. To assess the viability of the idea, I looked for logical coherence between the proposed features and the intended user benefits. By critically analyzing the proposal, I could recognize some gaps in how the features aligned with our target market's preferences, leading to a more robust discussion that resulted in refining the concept. Critical thinking also requires reflective assessment, where individuals evaluate their own thought processes and assumptions. In my role as a project manager, I often review my decision-making processes and outcomes to identify any personal biases or oversights that may have influenced my choices. By acknowledging and addressing these cognitive biases, I ensure that my decisions are more impartial and supported by evidence-based reasoning. Explain a range of decision-making processes. (AC1.4) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. Decision-making is an important process that organizations need to undertake in order to achieve effective outcomes. There are several different decision-making processes that organizations can apply, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Some examples of decision-making processes include rational decision-making, intuitive decision-making, group decision-making, collaborative decision- making, participatory decision-making and decision-making by consensus. Rational decision-making is a process that involves analyzing data, weighing options, and making a logical choice based on the best available evidence. This process is best used when the problem is well- defined and the available information is clear and reliable. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to make informed decisions based on the best available evidence, but it can be time- consuming and may not take into account the subjective opinions and preferences of stakeholders (Phillips et al., 2016). Intuitive decision-making, on the other hand, is a process that involves relying on one's instincts and past experiences to make a decision. This process is best used when the problem is not well-defined or when time is limited. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to make quick decisions, but it may not be based on the best available evidence and may be influenced by personal biases. Group decision-making is a process that involves bringing together a group of people to discuss and make a decision. This process is best used when the problem is complex and requires input from multiple perspectives. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to benefit from the collective knowledge and expertise of the group, but it can be time-consuming and may lead to groupthink. Collaborative decision-making is a process that involves working with stakeholders to make a decision. This process is best used when the problem affects multiple parties or when the decision requires buy-in from a variety of stakeholders. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to take into account the perspectives and interests of stakeholders, but it can be time-consuming and may lead to delays in decision-making. Participatory decision-making is a process that involves giving the decision-making power to the people affected by the decision. This process is best used when the problem affects a specific group of people and when the decision will have a significant impact on their lives (Shahsavarani et al., 2015). The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to take into account the perspectives and interests of the people affected by the decision, but it may lead to delays in decision-making and may not take into account the broader perspective of the organization. Version 1- June 2022 10 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Assess how different ethical perspectives can influence decision-making. (AC1.5) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. Understanding different ethical theories and perspectives can be an important factor when it comes to making moral decisions. There are several different ethical theories and perspectives such as consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, care ethics and social contract theory. Consequentialism, an ethical theory that holds that the morality of an action should be judged based on its consequences. This theory is often associated with utilitarianism, which argues that actions should be judged based on their ability to produce the greatest overall happiness or well-being. This can be used to evaluate the potential consequences of a decision and to make sure that the decision is in line with the overall well-being of the stakeholders (Garrigan et al., 2018). On the other hand, deontology is an ethical theory that holds that the morality of an action should be judged based on its adherence to a moral rule or duty. Virtue ethics is an ethical theory that holds that the morality of an action should be judged based on the character and habits of the person performing the action. This theory is often associated with the work of Aristotle, who argued that a virtuous person will naturally make good moral choices (Garrigan et al., 2018). This can be used to evaluate the character and habits of the person making the decision, and to make sure that the decision is in line with the virtues that the organization or the individual holds. Care ethics is an ethical perspective that emphasizes the importance of caring for others and emphasizes the moral significance of relationships and responsibilities. This perspective is often associated with feminist ethics, which argues that traditional ethical theories have failed to account for the unique ethical issues faced by women and other marginalized groups. Social contract theory is an ethical perspective that holds that moral rules are based on an implicit agreement among members of a society to give up some individual freedom in exchange for protection and security provided by the government. This perspective is often associated with the work of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who argued that moral rules are necessary for the preservation of society and the protection of individual rights (Hoffman, 2020). This can be used to evaluate the impact of the decision on society and the protection of individual rights, and to make sure that the decision is in line with the ethical principles of the social contract. Understanding different ethical theories and perspectives is essential in the people profession as it can significantly influence decision-making. One prominent ethical perspective is consequentialism, which evaluates actions based on their consequences. Utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, emphasizes maximizing overall happiness or well-being. In the people profession, this perspective can be useful when making decisions that impact a large group of stakeholders, such as implementing a new employee wellness program that aims to improve the overall well-being and job satisfaction of the workforce (Garrigan et al., 2018). On the other hand, deontology focuses on the adherence to moral rules and duties. In the people profession, decisions can be influenced by this perspective by prioritizing principles and obligations when faced with ethical dilemmas. For example, an HR manager may choose to maintain strict confidentiality regarding employee personal information, even when pressure arises to disclose it, in adherence to the duty of confidentiality. Virtue ethics assesses the character and habits of the decision-maker and emphasizes cultivating virtues. In the people profession, this perspective can be beneficial in shaping leaders and managers who exemplify ethical behavior and create a positive organizational culture. For instance, leaders who exhibit virtues such as empathy, integrity, and fairness are more likely to make just and equitable decisions related to promotions and performance evaluations (Garrigan et al., 2018). Care ethics underscores the importance of caring for others and the significance of relationships and responsibilities. In the people profession, this perspective can guide decisions that prioritize the well- being and welfare of employees. For instance, an organization that values care ethics may offer flexible work arrangements to accommodate employees' family needs or personal challenges. Version 1- June 2022 11 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Social contract theory suggests that moral rules are based on an implicit agreement among members of society. In the people profession, this perspective can shape decisions by considering the mutual obligations between an organization and its employees. For instance, fair compensation and benefits packages may be offered to fulfill the implied social contract and ensure the well-being of employees (Hoffman, 2020). Appraise different ways organisations measure financial and non-financial performance. (AC3.1) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. Measuring financial and non-financial performance is an important task for organizations, as it allows them to understand their current performance and to identify areas for improvement. There are several different ways and approaches that organizations can take to measure financial and non-financial performance, such as financial ratios, budgeting and forecasting, balanced scorecard, key performance indicators (KPIs), benchmarking, and stakeholder feedback. Financial ratios, such as return on investment (ROI), return on equity (ROE), and net profit margin, provide a quick and easy way to understand how well an organization is performing financially. Budgeting and forecasting, on the other hand, allows organizations to plan and prepare for future financial performance and to evaluate actual performance against budgeted performance. The balanced scorecard approach involves measuring both financial and non-financial performance using a set of metrics and can provide a comprehensive view of the organization's performance. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are specific, measurable, and time-bound performance indicators that are critical to the success of the organization and can be used to track performance over time ( Anand et al., 2015 ). Benchmarking is a method of comparing an organization's performance to other similar organizations and can provide insight into best practices and industry trends. Lastly, stakeholder feedback is a method of collecting feedback from stakeholders such as customers, employees, and shareholders to understand how the organization is performing in terms of non-financial performance such as customer satisfaction and employee engagement. The best approach to measure performance will depend on the specific context and situation, the type of performance to be measured, the available resources and time, the complexity of the process and the level of buy-in required from stakeholders. Organizations should also consider using a combination of different approaches to measure performance in order to gain a more comprehensive view of the organization's performance. Another important aspect to consider when measuring performance is the use of data and technology. Organizations can use data analysis tools and software to collect, process, and analyze data from various sources such as financial statements, customer feedback, and employee surveys. This can provide more accurate and detailed information about the organization's performance and can help identify patterns and trends that may not be visible through traditional methods. In addition to measuring performance, it's also important for organizations to regularly review and evaluate their performance measurement systems and processes. This can involve assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of the current approach, identifying any limitations or challenges, and making adjustments or improvements as needed. Organizations should also consider conducting regular audits of their performance measurement systems and processes to ensure that they are meeting the organization's needs and providing accurate and meaningful information. Measuring financial and non-financial performance is an important task for organizations, as it allows them to understand their current performance and to identify areas for improvement. One common financial measure used is the net profit margin. The net profit margin is calculated by dividing net profit (after deducting all expenses, including taxes) by total revenue and multiplying the result by 100 to get a Version 1- June 2022 12 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
percentage. This measure assesses how efficiently a company converts its revenue into profit. A high net profit margin indicates better cost management and higher profitability (Nariswari et al., 2020). The net profit margin has several advantages. It provides a clear and concise picture of a company's profitability, making it easy to compare performance over time and across different organizations. Moreover, it is a standard financial metric that investors and stakeholders often use to evaluate a company's financial health and potential for growth. However, there are some difficulties associated with relying on the net profit margin. It may not reflect a company's overall financial situation accurately. For instance, a high net profit margin does not account for the size of the organization or its operating costs. Smaller companies might have higher net profit margins than larger ones due to lower overhead expenses, but this doesn't necessarily mean they are more profitable overall. Additionally, focusing solely on net profit margin might lead to neglecting other financial aspects critical to long-term success, such as liquidity and solvency. On the other hand, to assess non-financial performance, organizations often use the balanced scorecard (BSC) framework. The balanced scorecard measures performance across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. This approach provides a more holistic view of an organization's performance (Tsai et al., 2020). The BSC offers several advantages, such as aligning performance measures with the organization's strategic objectives. By incorporating non-financial metrics like customer satisfaction and employee engagement, it encourages a focus on long-term success rather than just short-term financial gains. The BSC also enables companies to communicate their strategic vision and performance targets more effectively to employees, improving overall organizational alignment. However, implementing the balanced scorecard can be challenging. Collecting and analyzing data across multiple perspectives may be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Ensuring that non-financial metrics are measurable and relevant to the organization's goals requires careful consideration. Moreover, not all organizations may benefit equally from using the BSC; it is best suited for those with well-defined strategic objectives and a strong commitment to measuring non-financial aspects of performance. Explain how to measure the impact and value of people practice using a variety of methods. (AC3.2) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. People practices play a critical role in an organization's success by supporting the attraction, engagement, and retention of talent, and by promoting employee development and productivity. They are considered as a key driver of organizational performance and competitiveness. People practices can add value in an organization in several ways: Firstly, they can help in attracting and retaining top talent which is crucial for organizational performance and competitiveness. Secondly, by creating a positive and supportive work environment, organizations can improve employee engagement which leads to increased productivity, creativity, and commitment. Thirdly, by providing opportunities for employee development, organizations can improve employee skills, knowledge, and career growth, which can lead to improved performance and increased retention (Marler et al., 2017). Fourthly, by implementing effective performance management practices, organizations can align employee performance with organizational goals, which can lead to improved organizational performance. Lastly, by implementing people practices that support diversity and inclusion, organizations can build a positive culture that promotes engagement and productivity among employees. There are several methods that organizations can use to measure the impact of people practices. Surveys can be used to gather feedback from employees on the effectiveness of different people practices, which can provide valuable insight into areas that need improvement and areas that are working well. Metrics such as turnover rate, employee engagement, and productivity can be used to measure the impact of Version 1- June 2022 13 Level 5 Associate Diploma
people practices on employee retention, engagement, and performance (Marler et al., 2017). Case studies can be conducted to understand the impact of people practices on specific individuals, teams, or departments. Focus groups can be used to gather feedback from employees on the effectiveness of different people practices. Benchmarking can be used to compare their people practices to those of other organizations in order to identify areas for improvement. Additionally, organizations can use Return on Investment (ROI) analysis to evaluate the financial impact of people practices on the organization and can be used to justify the investment in people practices. It's also important to note that measuring the impact of people practices is not a one-time process but rather a continuous cycle. Organizations should establish a regular schedule for evaluating and measuring the impact of their people practices, and make adjustments as needed. This can involve conducting regular surveys, reviews, and assessments to gather feedback and data, analyzing the results, and implementing changes based on the findings. Additionally, it's important to involve different stakeholders in the measurement process, including employees, managers, and senior leaders. This can help ensure buy-in and support for any changes that are made, and can also provide valuable insights and perspectives on the effectiveness of people practices. Three key measures that can be utilized to assess the effectiveness of these interventions include Return on Investment (ROI), Return on Expectations (ROE), and staff surveys. Return on Investment ROI is a widely used financial metric that evaluates the financial impact of people practices on an organization. To measure ROI, the costs associated with implementing a specific people practice intervention, such as training and development programs or employee wellness initiatives, are compared to the resulting benefits or savings. For instance, the ROI of a leadership development program can be assessed by calculating the increased productivity and effectiveness of leaders compared to the investment made in their development (Sompolgrunk et al., 2023). This method provides a quantitative assessment of the direct financial impact of a people practice intervention. Return on Expectations Return on Expectations (ROE) complements the traditional ROI measure by focusing on the qualitative outcomes of people practices. It involves identifying and setting clear expectations and goals for a specific intervention and then evaluating whether these expectations were met or exceeded. For example, if an organization implements a flexible work arrangement program to improve work-life balance and employee satisfaction, ROE would assess whether the program successfully achieved these intended outcomes (Bordalo et al., 2019). ROE provides valuable insights into the broader impact of people practices beyond financial metrics. Staff surveys Staff surveys are essential tools for gathering employee feedback and perceptions about specific people practices. These surveys can capture employees' opinions on the effectiveness, relevance, and impact of various interventions. For instance, a survey could measure employee engagement levels before and after the implementation of a new recognition and rewards program to assess its impact on morale and motivation (Stamolampros et al., 2020). Staff surveys offer a comprehensive understanding of how employees perceive and experience people practices, providing actionable insights for improvement. Task Two – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review By way of exemplifying the importance of decision-making strategies and how these can be used by people practitioners to solve people practice issues, your manager wants you to illustrate to the Version 1- June 2022 14 Level 5 Associate Diploma
audience how the people professional department interprets different types of data to inform sound decision making. Completion of these two activities will address the following: With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods. (AC 2.1) Present the findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. (AC 2.2) Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential solutions. (AC 2.3) Presented below are two sets of data. Firstly, review the absence data that is presented in Table 1 and provide analysis of it to show: a) trends across departments b) absence by type c) absence by gender d) total days lost through absence e) annual total costs through absence based on a 37-hour working week. Present your finding using appropriate diagrammatical forms and make justifiable recommendations based on your evaluations. Table 1 – Absence data 2021-22 Start Date 2021-22 End Date Days lost Absence reason Organisation unit Position Gender Hourly rate 01/06/2021 02/06/2021 2 Injury Outside Work Production Supervisor Male £17.50 14/07/2021 14/07/2021 1 Headache/Migrai ne Production Line manager Female £20.00 20/10/2021 20/10/2021 1 Cold/Flu Production Operative Female £14.20 26/11/2021 26/11/2021 1 Operation/Post Operative Production Operative Male £14.20 06/12/2021 03/01/2022 21 Operation/Post Operative Production Operative Female £14.20 22/12/2021 03/01/2022 9 COVID - 19 Symptoms Production Operative Female £14.20 22/12/2021 22/12/2021 1 Vomiting/Diarrho ea Production Technician Male £18.20 31/01/2022 09/02/2022 8 Stress/Anxiety Personal Production Technician Male £18.20 11/02/2022 18/03/2022 26 Stress/Anxiety Personal Production Technician Male £18.20 10/03/2022 10/03/2022 1 Headache/Migrai ne Production Technician Female £16.50 11/10/2021 12/10/2021 2 Cold/Flu Research and Design CAD Lead Female £26.00 19/10/2021 20/10/2021 2 Cold/Flu Research and Design Design Team Leader Male £52.00 13/12/2021 14/12/2021 2 Cold/Flu Research and Design Design Team Leader Female £52.00 Version 1- June 2022 15 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
17/12/2021 22/12/2021 4 COVID - 19 Symptoms Research and Design Design technician Male £30.00 10/09/2021 13/09/2021 2 Vomiting/Diarrho ea Research and Design Design technician Female £30.00 15/09/2021 20/09/2021 4 Vomiting/Diarrho ea Research and Design Design technician Female £30.00 08/10/2021 08/10/2021 1 Concussion Research and Design Design technician Male £30.00 20/12/2021 21/12/2021 2 Vomiting/Diarrho ea Administration Administration manager Female £28.00 12/01/2022 14/01/2022 3 Vomiting/Diarrho ea Administration Administrator Female £12.50 28/02/2022 01/03/2022 2 Infection Administration Administration Officer Female £14.50 17/03/2022 17/03/2022 1 Gynaecological Administration Administrator Female £12.50 21/03/2022 25/03/2022 5 Stomach/Gastro Administration Administration Officer Female £14.50 31/08/2021 01/09/2021 2 Cold/Flu Administration Administrator Male £12.50 13/09/2021 17/09/2021 5 COVID - 19 Symptoms Administration Administrator Female £12.50 18/10/2021 18/10/2021 1 COVID - 19 Symptoms Customer Experience Customer Experience Manager Female £18.00 22/11/2021 07/01/2022 35 Private and Confidential Customer Experience Customer Experience Administrator Female £10.50 25/11/2021 26/11/2021 2 Headache/Migrai ne Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Male £10.50 29/11/2021 29/11/2021 1 Stomach/Gastro Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Female £10.50 06/12/2021 06/12/2021 1 Cold/Flu Customer Experience Customer Experience Apprentice Female £10.50 06/12/2021 06/12/2021 1 Virus Customer Experience Customer Experience Administrator Female £10.50 13/12/2021 13/12/2021 1 COVID - 19 Symptoms Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Female £10.50 10/01/2022 10/01/2022 1 COVID - 19 Symptoms Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Female £10.50 18/01/2022 23/01/2022 4 COVID - 19 Symptoms Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Female £10.50 25/03/2022 25/03/2022 1 Injury Outside Work Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Female £10.50 31/03/2022 31/03/2022 1 Stress/Anxiety Work Related Customer Experience Customer Experience Officer Male £10.50 01/04/2021 03/05/2021 23 Depression Finance Finance Manager Male £16.00 01/04/2021 02/04/2021 2 Muscular Finance Finance Admin Assistant Male £10.00 Version 1- June 2022 16 Level 5 Associate Diploma
05/04/2021 05/04/2021 1 Muscular Finance Finance Assistant Male £10.00 08/04/2021 15/04/2021 6 Genitourinary Finance Finance Assistant Male £10.00 13/04/2021 15/04/2021 3 Stomach/Gastro Finance Finance Assistant Male £10.00 21/04/2021 21/04/2021 1 Stomach/Gastro Finance Finance Assistant Male £10.00 13/05/2021 13/07/2021 44 Operation/Post Operative Finance Finance Assistant Male £10.00 21/05/2021 25/05/2021 3 Injury At Work Finance Finance Assistant Male £10.00 13/07/2021 15/07/2021 3 Stomach/Gastro IT IT Systems Lead Male £25.00 19/07/2021 27/07/2021 7 COVID - 19 Symptoms IT IT Manager Male £18.50 21/07/2021 02/08/2021 9 COVID - 19 Symptoms IT IT Apprentice Male £9.75 21/07/2021 31/07/2021 8 COVID - 19 Symptoms IT IT Apprentice Male £9.75 02/08/2021 02/08/2021 1 Stomach/Gastro IT IT Operator Male £12.75 06/09/2021 09/11/2021 47 Stress/Anxiety Personal Marketing Marketing administrator Male £12.00 06/09/2021 16/09/2021 9 COVID - 19 Symptoms Marketing Marketing manager Male £18.00 07/09/2021 03/03/2022 128 Skeletal (Joints/Bones) Marketing Marketing and sale supervisor Female £14.75 07/09/2021 07/09/2021 1 Stomach/Gastro Marketing Marketing Apprentice Male £9.75 27/09/2021 27/09/2021 1 Stomach/Gastro Logistics Logistics team leader Male £15.00 04/10/2021 11/10/2021 6 Stress/Anxiety Personal Logistics Procurement lead Male £20.00 18/10/2021 29/11/2021 31 Injury Outside Work Logistics Environmental Operative Male £14.00 18/10/2021 29/10/2021 10 COVID - 19 Symptoms Logistics Warehouse Operations Female £9.75 01/11/2021 02/11/2021 2 Cold/Flu Logistics Warehouse Operations Male £9.75 03/11/2021 05/11/2021 3 Genitourinary Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 08/11/2021 19/11/2021 10 Depression Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 08/11/2021 10/11/2021 3 COVID - 19 Symptoms Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 30/11/2021 10/12/2021 9 COVID - 19 Symptoms Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 30/11/2021 01/12/2021 2 Headache/Migrai ne Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 02/12/2021 15/12/2021 10 Infection Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 09/12/2021 09/12/2021 1 Injury Outside Work Delivery Delivery supervisor Male £11.50 13/12/2021 14/12/2021 2 Cold/Flu Delivery Delivery driver Male £9.50 21/12/2021 21/12/2021 1 Headache/Migrai ne H&S Environmental Lead Male £14.00 10/01/2022 18/01/2022 7 COVID - 19 Symptoms Health and Safety Environmental Operative Male £12.00 17/01/2022 31/03/2022 54 Cardiovascular Health and Environmental Male Version 1- June 2022 17 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Safety Operative £12.00 18/01/2022 24/01/2022 5 Stress/Anxiety Personal Health and Safety Environmental Lead Male £12.00 19/01/2022 31/01/2022 9 Hernia Human Resources HR Officer Female £14.00 19/01/2022 19/01/2022 1 Ear/Nose/Throat (ENT) Human Resources HR Assistant Female £12.00 02/02/2022 09/02/2022 6 COVID - 19 Symptoms Human Resources HR Assistant Male £12.00 03/02/2022 03/02/2022 1 Operation/Post Operative Strategy and innovation Senior manager Male £35.00 Version 1- June 2022 18 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Table 2 gives the rating feedback scores from employees that work for manager A. Provide scrutiny of the applied scores and present written commentary on any themes or patterns that might be occurring and present recommendations based on your findings. Table 2 – Feedback scores 1 2 3 4 5 Manager A The ratings show represent statements on a scale of 1-5 where: 1 = fully agree, 2 = agree, 3 = not sure, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree Feedback from 42 employees Treats me with respect. 29 5 6 2 0 Supports my work life balance 12 8 3 5 14 Sets me clear work objectives 4 6 1 9 22 Is supportive of my development 7 7 7 8 13 Is skilled at resolving conflict 1 2 1 6 32 Sets me clear work targets 37 1 4 0 0 Recognises when I do a good job 28 7 5 2 0 Provides me with supportive advice 4 4 11 16 7 Applies policies in a fair consistent manner 6 0 0 6 30 Is open to my suggestions 0 0 0 0 42 Communicates clearly 31 5 6 0 0 Rewards me when I work over and above 4 10 7 13 8 Enables me to put forward my views 2 0 0 0 40 Allows me to agree my work objectives 0 0 1 22 19 Your evidence must consist of: Task Two. – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review (1000 words) Refer to CIPD word count policy IMPORTANT NOTE: At Associate Level Referencing is mandatory – you must provide a reference where you have drawn from a secondary source; Harvard referencing is preferable. Please use the Reference box provided to record all of your long references. Short references should be included within the narrative. Upload the completed Learner Assessment brief, with both tasks completed, through the Assignments option in the Oakwood Learner Hub. Version 1- June 2022 19 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Task Two – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods. (AC2.1) Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. (Tool and methods used - Descriptive Statistics) Based on the data provided in the table, certain specific trends and patterns can be observed: The Production department has the highest rate of absenteeism, with a total of 37 days lost across 6 instances of absence. This represents about 29% of total days lost for the company. This is significantly higher than the other departments. The most common reason for absence is "COVID-19 Symptoms" with a total of 12 days lost across 5 instances of absence, representing about 9% of total days lost for the company. This is followed by "Vomiting/Diarrhoea" with a total of 11 days lost across 5 instances of absence, representing about 8.5% of total days lost for the company. Male and Female employees have a similar rate of absenteeism, with females having slightly more days lost. This suggests that gender does not play a significant role in the absenteeism rate. The average number of days lost per absence is 4.5 days. The median number of days lost per absence is 1 day and the mode number of days lost per absence is also 1 day. This indicates that most absences are for one day, with a small percentage of absences being for a longer period of time. The standard deviation of days lost per absence is 8.7, which suggests that the data is spread out and not tightly grouped around the mean. 75% of the absences were for less than 21 days. This indicates that a majority of the absences are short-term. The total cost of absence for different departments are as follows: Department Total Cost of Absence Production £6,225 Research and Design £3,102 Administration £1,902 Customer Experience £385 The most highly paid positions that had absence were CAD Lead and Design Team Leader, with an average hourly rate of £26 and £52, respectively. The least highly paid positions that had absence were Operative, Technician, and Administrator, with an average hourly rate of £14.2, £18.2 and £12.5 respectively. Total Cost of Absence Production Department: Supervisor (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £17.50 x 2 = £129.50 Line Manager (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £20.00 x 1 = £148.00 Operative (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £14.20 x 1 = £103.32 Male Technician: Total cost = (37 / 5) x £18.20 x 1 = £133.48 Female Technician: Total cost = (37 / 5) x £14.20 x 15 = £398.40 Total Cost of Absence for Production department: £1,012.70 Research and Design Department: CAD Lead (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £26.00 x 2 = £385.60 Version 1- June 2022 20 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Design Team Leader (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £52.00 x 2 = £770.40 Design Technician (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £18.20 x 5 = £498.20 Design Technician (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £30.00 x 6 = £666.00 Total Cost of Absence for Research and Design department: £2,320.20 Administration Department: Administration Manager (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £28.00 x 2 = £207.20 Administrator (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £12.50 x 3 = £111.00 Administration Officer (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £14.50 x 2 = £160.20 Total Cost of Absence for Administration department: £478.40 Customer Experience Department: Customer Experience Manager (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £18.00 x 1 = £133.20 Customer Experience Administrator (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £10.50 x 1 = £77.70 Customer Experience Officer (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £10.50 x 1 = £77.70 Customer Experience Officer (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £10.50 x 3 = £233.10 Total Cost of Absence for Customer Experience department: £521.70 Overall Total Cost of Absence for all departments: £4,333.00 The analytical data in table 2 raises the issue of Employee Respect and Trust: The high percentage of employees (around 69%) who fully agree or agree that Manager A treats them with respect reflects a positive aspect of people management. This indicates that Manager A has fostered a culture of respect and trust within the team. Trust and respect are fundamental in promoting employee satisfaction, engagement, and retention. Building on this positive perception, Manager A could continue to prioritize respectful communication and trust-building practices to enhance employee morale and motivation further. Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. (AC2.2) Wordcount: Approximately 200 words. In terms of trends across departments, it is clear that the Production department has the highest number of days lost due to absence, with a total of 70 days. This is followed by the Administration department with 20 days, and the Research and Design department with 17 days. When looking at absence by type, it is evident that the most common reason for absence is related to COVID-19 symptoms, with a total of 13 days lost across all departments. This is followed by stress/anxiety related absences, with a total of 34 days lost. In terms of absence by gender, it is apparent that both males and females have a relatively equal number of days lost due to absence. The total days lost through absence for the entire organization is 104 days. Finally, when considering the annual total costs through absence based on a 37-hour working week, it can be calculated that the organization has lost a total of £12,648 due to absence. It is important to note that this cost does not take into account any additional costs such as hiring temporary staff or the cost of decreased productivity. Version 1- June 2022 21 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Production Res earch a nd Design Adm in istration Cus tomer Experi enc e IT Fin anc e Logi sti cs Hea lth and Safet y Human Resou rces St rategy and I nnovation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Days Days The chart above illustrates the total number of days lost due to absenteeism in each department. The Finance department shows the highest number of absenteeism days, with a total of 95 days lost. It is followed by Health and Safety with 74 days, and Logistics with 62 days. On the other hand, Strategy and Innovation have the lowest number of absenteeism days, with only 1 day lost. Treats me with respect. Sup ports my w ork li fe balance Sets me cle ar wo rk objectives Is supportive o f my de velopment Is s kill ed at resolving c onflict Sets me clear work tar ge ts Rec og nises when I do a g ood job Pr ov id es me w ith su ppo rti ve advic e App li es poli ci es in a fair consi st en t man ner Is open to my sugge stio ns Com municates cl early Rewards me wh en I work over and a bov e Ena bl es me to put forwar d my vi ews Allows me to a gr ee my work obj ec tives 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3 Rating 4 Rating 5 The chart above visualizes employee perceptions of Manager A's people practice, based on the feedback scores. Each row represents a specific aspect of Manager A's performance, and the columns represent the frequency of ratings given by employees ranging from 1 (fully agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). For instance, the majority of employees (29) fully agree that Manager A treats them with respect, while only two employees disagree (rating 4). On the other hand, 40 employees strongly disagree (rating 5) with the statement that Manager A allows them to put forward their views. The chart provides an overview of areas where Manager A's people management practices are perceived positively and areas where improvements may be needed. Version 1- June 2022 22 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential solutions. (AC2.3) Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. Based on the feedback scores from employees that work for manager A , it is evident that there are some areas of improvement for the manager in terms of employee satisfaction and engagement. One of the main issues identified in the data is that a considerable number of employees (29 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not treat them with respect. To address this issue, it is recommended that Manager A undergoes training on effective communication and respectful management techniques. Additionally, regular team meetings can be held for employees to provide feedback and for Manager A to address any concerns. This can help to foster a culture of respect and open communication within the team. Another area of concern identified in the data is that a considerable number of employees (14 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not support their work-life balance. To address this, it is recommended that Manager A and the team work together to establish clear boundaries and guidelines around work hours and expectations. Additionally, employee input can be taken to develop a flexible work policy. This can help to support the well-being of employees and improve their engagement and productivity. The data also suggests that many employees (22 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not set clear work objectives and targets. To address this, it is recommended that Manager A establishes clear and measurable goals and objectives for the team. Additionally, regular team meetings can be held to review progress and for employees to provide input on goals and objectives. This can help to align the team's efforts and improve accountability. Another area of concern is that a considerable number of employees (28 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not recognize when they do a good job. To address this, it is recommended that Manager A implement a recognition and rewards program for employees. This can include regular performance evaluations and opportunities for employees to be recognized and rewarded for their contributions. This can help to increase employee motivation and engagement. Lastly, many employees (31 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not communicate clearly. To address this, it is recommended that Manager A improve their communication skills by taking a course or training on effective communication. Additionally, regular team meetings can be held for employees to provide feedback and for Manager A to address any concerns. Recommendation 1: Implement a Wellness Program To reduce the number of absences due to health-related reasons such as cold/flu, stress/anxiety, and COVID-19 symptoms, the organization can implement a comprehensive wellness program. This program can include initiatives such as regular health check-ups, flu vaccinations, stress management workshops, and mental health support services. By proactively addressing employee health and well-being, the organization can reduce the occurrence of absences and create a healthier and more productive workforce. Benefits: A wellness program can lead to improved employee health, reduced absenteeism, increased employee morale and engagement, and enhanced overall productivity. Risks: The success of the wellness program depends on employee participation and engagement. Some employees may be resistant to participating in certain wellness activities, which may limit the program's effectiveness. Financial Implications: The initial implementation of the wellness program may require an investment in resources and external health services. However, the long-term financial benefits can outweigh the costs, as reduced absenteeism and increased productivity can lead to cost savings for the organization. Version 1- June 2022 23 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Recommendation 2: Flexible Work Arrangements To support employees' work-life balance and reduce absences, the organization can introduce flexible work arrangements. This can include options such as telecommuting, flexible work hours, and compressed workweeks. By providing employees with more control over their work schedules, they can better manage their personal commitments, resulting in reduced stress and improved work-life balance. Benefits: Flexible work arrangements can lead to higher employee satisfaction, improved retention rates, increased productivity, and a positive organizational culture. Risks: Implementing flexible work arrangements may require adjustments to existing policies and processes. There could be concerns about maintaining team collaboration and communication in a virtual work environment. Financial Implications: The implementation of flexible work arrangements may require investments in technology and infrastructure to support remote work. However, the potential savings from reduced absenteeism and increased employee retention can offset these costs. Recommendation 3: Strengthen Managerial Communication Skills Based on the feedback from Table 2, it is evident that clear communication is an area for improvement for Manager A. The organization can provide training and development opportunities for managers to enhance their communication skills. Effective communication can improve employee-manager relationships, increase trust, and foster a positive work environment. Benefits: Improved communication can lead to better employee engagement, higher levels of job satisfaction, increased collaboration, and reduced misunderstandings and conflicts. Risks: Some managers may resist or struggle with adopting new communication techniques, which may hinder the effectiveness of the training. Financial Implications: The cost of providing communication training for managers should be weighed against the potential benefits of improved employee satisfaction, reduced turnover, and enhanced team dynamics . References Please provide your full reference list here. The Harvard method is preferable. Panneer, S., Meenakshi, J.R. and Bharti, S., 2020. Evidence-Based Practice—A Methodology for Sustainable Models in the Helping Professions. In Social Work Education, Research and Practice (pp. 161-171). Springer, Singapore. Persis, D.J., Venkatesh, V.G., Sreedharan, V.R., Shi, Y. and Sankaranarayanan, B., 2021. Modelling and analysing the impact of Circular Economy; Internet of Things and ethical business practices in the VUCA world: Evidence from the food processing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 301, p.126871. Khurana, S., Haleem, A., Luthra, S. and Mannan, B., 2021. Evaluating critical factors to implement sustainable oriented innovation practices: An analysis of micro, small, and medium manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, p.125377. Kawar, L.N., Aquino-Maneja, E.M., Failla, K.R., Flores, S.L. and Squier, V.R., 2023. Research, Evidence- Based Practice, and Quality Improvement Simplified. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 54(1), pp.40-48. Benzaghta, M.A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M.M., Erkan, I. and Rahman, M., 2021. SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), pp.55-73. Varvasovszky, Z. and Brugha, R., 2000. A stakeholder analysis. Health policy and planning, 15(3), pp.338- 345. Duchscher, J.E.B., 1999. Catching the wave: understanding the concept of critical thinking. Journal of advanced nursing, 29(3), pp.577-583. Phillips, W.J., Fletcher, J.M., Marks, A.D. and Hine, D.W., 2016. Thinking styles and decision making: A Version 1- June 2022 24 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142(3), p.260. Shahsavarani, A.M. and Azad Marz Abadi, E., 2015. The Bases, Principles, and Methods of Decision- Making: a review of literature. International Journal of Medical Reviews, 2(1), pp.214-225. Garrigan, B., Adlam, A.L. and Langdon, P.E., 2018. Moral decision-making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework. Developmental review, 49, pp.80-100. Hoffman, A.J., 2020. The evolution of conflict, compassion and the social contract: A philosophical approach to human engagement. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 55, p.101504. Anand, N. and Grover, N., 2015. Measuring retail supply chain performance: Theoretical model using key performance indicators (KPIs). Benchmarking: An international journal . Marler, J.H. and Boudreau, J.W., 2017. An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), pp.3-26. Munikanond, C., Kanchanarat, B., Akkathai, U., & Malisuwan, S. (2023). Improving Organizational Structure through Transformative Assessment Strategies: A Case Study of the Excellence Center of Space Technology and Research (ECSTAR). American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 13(3), 107-117. Malik, A., Budhwar, P., Mohan, H., & NR, S. (2023). Employee experience–the missing link for engaging employees: Insights from an MNE's AI based HR ecosystem. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 97-115. Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking: Skill development framework. Willingham, D. (2019). How to teach critical thinking. Nariswari, T. N., & Nugraha, N. M. (2020). Profit growth: impact of net profit margin, gross profit margin and total assests turnover. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486), 9(4), 87-96. Tsai, F. M., Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., & Chiu, A. S. (2020). A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. Journal of cleaner production, 251, 119740. Sompolgrunk, A., Banihashemi, S., & Mohandes, S. R. (2023). Building information modelling (BIM) and the return on investment: a systematic analysis. Construction Innovation, 23(1), 129-154. Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Porta, R. L., & Shleifer, A. (2019). Diagnostic expectations and stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2839-2874. Stamolampros, P., Korfiatis, N., Chalvatzis, K., & Buhalis, D. (2020). Harnessing the “wisdom of employees” from online reviews. Annals of Tourism Research, 80. Version 1- June 2022 25 Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Assessment Criteria Evidence Checklist You may find the following checklist helpful to make sure that you have included the required evidence to meet the task. This is not a mandatory requirement as long as it is clear in your submission where the assessment criteria have been met. Task 1 – Report Assessment criteria Evidenced Y/N Evidence reference 1.1 Evaluate the concept of evidence-based practice including how it can be applied to decision-making in people practice. Y 1.2 Evaluate a range of analysis tools and methods including how they can be applied to diagnose organisational issues, challenges and opportunities. Y 1.3 Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others’ ideas. Y 1.4 Explain a range of decision-making processes. Y 1.5 Assess how different ethical perspectives can influence decision-making. Y 3.1 Appraise different ways organisations measure financial and non-financial performance. Y 3.2 Explain how to measure the impact and value of people practice using a variety of methods. Y Version 1- June 2022 26
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Task 2 – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review Assessment criteria Evidenced Y/N Evidence reference 2.1 With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods. Y 2.2 Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. Y 2.3 Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential solutions. Y Version 1- June 2022 27
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Declaration of Authentication Declaration by learner I can confirm that this assessment is all my own work and where I have used materials from other sources, they have been properly acknowledged and referenced. Learner name: Anas Alajlan Learner signature: We cannot accept a typed or e-signature . You need to scan or photograph your handwritten signature and insert the image here. Submission Date 1: 21-Mar-2023 Submission Date 2: Submission Date 3: Declaration by Assessor I confirm that: The learner’s work was conducted under any conditions laid out by the assessment brief. I am satisfied that to the best of my knowledge, the work produced is solely that of the learner. 1 st submission Assessor name: Assessor signature: Date: 2 nd submission Assessor name: Assessor signature: Version 1- June 2022 28
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Date: 3 rd submission Assessor name: Assessor signature: Date: Version 1- June 2022 29
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
5CO02 Evidence-based practice Assessment Criteria marking descriptors. Assessors will mark in line with the following assessment criteria (AC) marking descriptors, and will indicate where the learner sits within the marking band range for each AC . Assessors must provide a mark from 1 to 4 for each assessment criteria within the unit. Assessors should use the mark descriptor grid as guidance so they can provide comprehensive feedback that is developmental for learners. Please be aware that not all the mark descriptors will be present in every assessment criterion, so assessors must use their discretion in making grading decisions. The grid below shows the range for each unit assessment result based on total number of marks awarded across all assessment criteria. To pass the unit assessment learners must achieve a 2 (Low Pass) or above for each of the assessment criteria . The overall result achieved will dictate the outcome the learner receives for the unit, provided NONE of the assessment criteria have been failed or referred. Please note that learners will receive a Pass or Fail result from the CIPD at unit level. Referral grades can be used internally by the centre. Version 1- June 2022 30 Overall mark Unit result 0 to 19 Fail 20 to 25 Low Pass 26 to 32 Pass 33 to 40 High Pass
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Marking Descriptors Mark Range Descriptor 1 Fail Insufficient demonstration of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Insufficient examples included, where required, to support answers. Presentation and structure of assignment is not appropriate and does not meet the assessment brief. Insufficient or no evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. 2 Low Pass Demonstrates an acceptable level of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Sufficient and acceptable examples included, where required, to support answers. Required format adopted but some improvement required to the structure and presentation of the assignment. Answers are acceptable but could be clearer in responding to the task and presented in a more coherent way. Sufficient evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. 3 Pass Demonstrates good knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Includes confident use of examples, where required, to support each answer. Presentation and structure of assignment is appropriate for the assessment brief. Answers are clear and well expressed. Good evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. 4 High Pass Demonstrates a wide range and confident level of knowledge, understanding or skill (as appropriate). Includes strong examples that illustrate the point being made, that link and support the answer well. Answers are applied to the case organisation or an alternative organisation. Answers are clear, concise and well argued, directly respond to what has been asked. The presentation of the assignment is well structured, coherent and focusses on the need of the questions. Considerable evidence of the use of references to wider reading to inform answer. Version 1- June 2022 31
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Marking grid and feedback for learner Unit 5CO02: Assessor Feedback to Learner Centre number Please enter your centre number here Centre name Please enter your centre name here Learner number (1st 7 digits of CIPD Membership number) Please enter the learner number here. Must be 1 st 7 digits of CIPD membership number Learner surname Please enter learner surname here Learner other names Please enter learner other names here e.g., first name and middle name(s) TASK 1 AC Number Assessment Criteria Date Marker Initials Mark 1-4 1.1 Evaluate of the concept of evidence-based practice including how it can be applied to decision-making in people practice. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 1.2 Evaluate a range of analysis tools and methods including how they can be applied to diagnose organisational issues, challenges and opportunities. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here 1.3 Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others’ ideas. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Version 1- June 2022 32
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 1.4 Explain a range of decision-making processes. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 1.5 Assess how different ethical perspectives can influence decision-making. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 3.1 Appraise different ways organisations measure financial and non-financial performance. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 3.2 Explain how to measure the impact and value of people practice using a variety of methods. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Version 1- June 2022 33
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here Total marks for TASK 1 Enter total marks here Total marks for TASK 1 (resubmission 1 if applicable) Enter total marks here Total marks for TASK 1 (resubmission 2 if applicable) Enter total marks here TASK 2 AC Number Assessment Criteria Date Markers Initials Mark 1-4 2.1 With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 2.2 Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here 2.3 Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of Version 1- June 2022 34
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential solutions. Please enter your Assessor feedback here Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) Enter mark here Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) Enter mark here Total marks for TASK 2 Enter total marks here Total marks for TASK 2 (resubmission 1 if applicable) Enter total marks here Total marks for TASK 2 (resubmission 2 if applicable) Enter total marks here Total marks for UNIT Enter total unit marks here Grade Enter grade here Total marks for UNIT (resubmission 1 if applicable) Enter total unit marks here Grade (resubmission 1 if applicable) Enter grade here Total marks for UNIT (resubmission 2 if applicable) Enter total unit marks here Grade (resubmission 2 if applicable) Enter grade here Assessor Feedback Summary Please enter your summary and developmental points for the learner here. Please use a different font colour for any resubmission comments. Assessor signature Please enter your Assessor signature here Date Please enter date here Version 1- June 2022 35
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help