5CO02 LEARNER ASSESSMENT BRIEF JUNE 22 ANAS (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Oakwood University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2
Subject
Management
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
35
Uploaded by Aliriyadh
5CO02
Evidence-based practice
Learner Assessment Brief
Assessment ID / CIPD_5CO02_22_01
Level 5 Associate Diploma in
People Management
Organisational Learning and Development
Version 1- June 2022
2
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Please write clearly in block capitals.
Centre number:
8
7
5
Cente name:
Oakwood International
Learner number (1st 7 digits of CIPD
Membership number):
8
5
2
9
5
4
0
Learner surname:
Alajlan
Learner other names:
Anas
Unit code:
5CO02
Unit title:
Evidenced-based practice
Assessment ID:
CIPD_5CO02_22_01
Assessment start date:
Assessment submission date:
21-Mar-2023
First resubmission date for centre marking
– if applicable
Second resubmission date for centre
marking – if applicable
Declared word count
3,974 words
Assessor name (1
ST
Submission):
Assessor electronic signature:
Assessor name (2
nd
Submission)
Assessor electronic signature:
Assessor name (3
rd
Submission)
Assessor electronic signature:
IQA name (if applicable):
IQA signature (if applicable):
5CO02
Evidence-based practice
This unit assignment addresses the significance of capturing robust quantitative and qualitative evidence to
inform meaningful insight to influence critical thinking. It focuses on analysing evidence through an ethical
lens to improve decision-making and how measuring the impact of people practice is essential in creating
value.
CIPD’s insight
The Profession Map – Evidence-based practice
More, now than ever, people professionals are taking an evidence-based approach to their work, using
organisation data, research, stakeholder insights and perspectives as well as professional expertise to
deliver work that’s impactful.
Evidence-based practice is, quite simply, taking an evidence-based approach to your work: using the right
data and the right information in a structured way, to inform the decisions you take and the work that you
do, because it leads to better outcomes.
This area of the Profession Map focuses on the knowledge required to take this evidence-based approach. It
covers an understanding of evidence-based practice itself, as well as how to analyse and solve problems in
order to understand the business problem that needs resolving. It also includes knowledge of how to use
evidence in your work, such as using and commissioning research, using date and analytics, and exploring
stakeholder needs and concerns.
https://peopleprofession.cipd.org/profession-map/core-knowledge/analytics-creating-value
Evidence-based practice for effective decision- making (April 2022).
At the heart of evidence-based practice is the idea that good decision-making is achieved through critical
thinking and drawing on the best available evidence. Evidence- based practice leads to decisions and
actions that are more likely to have the desire effect and are less reliant on anecdotes, received wisdom and
personal experience – sources that are not trustworthy on their own. Evidence-based HR practice draws
together published research and people analytics with professional expertise and stakeholder opinions.
https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/strategy/analytics/evidence-based-practice-factsheet
Please note that the purpose of this insight is to link you to CIPD’s research and evidence within the subject
area, so that you can engage with the latest thinking.
It is not provided to replace the study required as part
of the learning or as formative assessment material.
Version 1- June 2022
3
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Preparation for the Tasks:
At the start of your assignment, you are encouraged to plan your assessment work with your Assessor
and where appropriate agree milestones so that they can help you monitor your progress.
Refer to the indicative content in the unit to guide and support your evidence.
Pay attention to how your evidence is presented, remember you are working in the People Practice
Team.
Ensure that the evidence generated for this assessment remains your own work.
You will also benefit from:
Completing and acting on formative feedback from your Assessor.
Reflecting on your own experiences of learning opportunities and continuous professional
development.
Reading the CIPD Insight, Fact Sheets and related online material on these topics as well as key research
authors on the subject.
Your evidence must consist of:
Task one-Report (2900 words)
IMPORTANT
NOTE:
At Associate Level Referencing is
mandatory
– you must provide a reference where
you have drawn from a secondary source; Harvard referencing is preferable. Please use the Reference
box provided to record all of your long references. Short references should be included within the
narrative.
Upload the completed Learner Assessment brief, with both tasks completed, through the Assignments
option in the Oakwood Learner Hub.
Version 1- June 2022
4
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Scenario
Your company is planning its forthcoming annual development event and the topic that the people practice
team will be showcasing is evidence-based practice. In readiness for this event your manager has asked you
to complete two tasks.
Task One – Report
Your first task is to write a report which provides the audience with an understanding of what evidence-
based practice is and the strategies that can be taken for effective critical thinking and decision-making, you
must ensure that you:
Provide evaluation of the concept of evidence-based practice and assess how evidence-based
practice approaches can be used to provide insight in supporting sound decision-making and
judgments for people practitioners across a range of people practices and organisational issues. (AC
1.1)
Provide evaluation of
one
appropriate analysis tool and
one
method that might be applied by
organisations to recognise and diagnose current and future issues, challenges, and opportunities. (AC
1.2)
Explain the main principles of critical thinking and describe how these might apply to individual and
work colleagues’ ideas to assist objective and rationale debate.
(AC 1.3)
Explain a range of decision-making processes that can be applied to ensure that effective outcomes
are achieved. (AC 1.4)
Assess a range of different ethical theories and perspectives and explain how understanding of these
can be used to inform and influence moral decision-making. (AC 1.5)
Appraise different ways and approaches organisations can take to measure financial and non-
financial performance. (AC 3.1)
Explain how people practices add value in an organisation and identify a range of methods that
might be used to measure the impact of a range of people practices (AC 3.2)
You should relate to academic concepts, theories and professional practice throughout your report to
ensure that your work is critical and informed by using key academic texts, articles and relevant
publications. All cited references used should be correctly acknowledged and presented in full in a
bibliography at the end of your report.
Version 1- June 2022
5
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Task One Report
You are required to prepare a report to senior managers at their forthcoming annual meeting. The report
needs to:
Evaluate the concept of evidence-based practice including how it can be applied to decision-making in
people practice.
(AC1.1)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only
list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section.
Wordcount: Approximately 450
words.
The concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely recognized as a valuable approach to decision-
making in healthcare and other fields. EBP emphasizes the use of rigorous research and data to inform
decisions, rather than relying solely on intuition or tradition (Panneer et al., 2020). This can lead to more
effective and efficient outcomes, as well as improved patient satisfaction and outcomes.
In the field of people practice, EBP can be used to inform a wide range of decisions and judgments. For
example, EBP can be used to inform the design and implementation of employee training programs by
identifying the most effective methods and materials based on research. It can also be used to evaluate
the effectiveness of different management strategies and identify areas for improvement. EBP can also
inform decision-making around employee engagement and retention by identifying the factors that have
been shown to be most important in these areas (Persis et al., 2021).
Another important aspect of implementing evidence-based practice in people practices is ensuring that
the evidence used is of high quality and relevant to the specific context and population. This means that
practitioners must be able to critically evaluate the research, consider the potential biases and
limitations, and determine whether the findings are applicable to their specific situation. It is also
important to use a combination of different types of evidence, such as quantitative and qualitative
research, as well as expert opinion and stakeholder perspectives, to gain a comprehensive understanding
of the issue at hand (
Kawar et al., 2023
). This helps to ensure that decisions are informed by a range of
perspectives and evidence, rather than relying on a single source or study.
EBP can also be used to identify and address disparities in employee performance or outcomes. For
example, by analyzing data on employee performance, organizations can identify patterns and trends
that may be related to factors such as race, gender, or other demographic characteristics. By
understanding these patterns, organizations can take steps to address any disparities and promote equity
in the workplace.
However, it is important to note that while evidence-based practice can provide valuable insight and
support, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. In some cases, research may not exist or be inconclusive on a
particular topic, and in such scenarios, practitioners must rely on their expertise and judgement.
Additionally, EBP should be integrated with other decision-making frameworks such as ethics and
diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) considerations.
Implementing EBP in people practices also requires a culture of continuous learning and improvement. It
requires organizations to be open to new ideas and evidence, and to be willing to adapt and change their
practices as new evidence becomes available. This can be challenging, but it is essential for organizations
that want to stay competitive and provide the best possible outcomes for their employees. Organizations
also need to invest in building the capability and skills of their people practitioners to be able to identify,
critically evaluate and apply evidence in their practice (Khurana et al., 2021).
The concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely recognized as a valuable approach to decision-
making in various fields, including healthcare and people practice. EBP emphasizes the integration of
rigorous research and data to inform decisions, moving away from reliance solely on intuition or tradition
(Panneer et al., 2020). This thoughtful integration of evidence can lead to more effective and efficient
Version 1- June 2022
6
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
outcomes, as well as improved satisfaction and results for individuals and organizations.
EBP holds immense potential in guiding a range of decisions and judgments as regards people practice.
One notable advantage of EBP in people practice is its ability to inform the design and implementation of
employee training programs. By tapping into research-based evidence, practitioners can identify the most
effective methods and materials that align with the unique needs of their workforce. This evidence-driven
approach ensures that training initiatives are tailored for optimal impact and employee growth. Similarly,
EBP offers valuable insights into evaluating the effectiveness of different management strategies.
Organizations can assess the merits and drawbacks of various approaches, empowering them to make
informed choices and adjustments that are aligned with the research evidence. Consequently, this
evidence-based evaluation fosters an environment of continuous improvement, elevating the overall
performance and efficiency of the organization.
When tackling issues pertaining to employee engagement and retention, EBP plays a critical role in
identifying the most influential factors. By examining well-established evidence, practitioners can
recognize the elements that contribute significantly to engagement and retention rates. This enables
organizations to implement targeted interventions that cultivate a positive work environment, foster
employee growth, and bolster overall satisfaction within the workforce (Persis et al., 2021). However,
while EBP is highly valuable, it comes with certain challenges and limitations. In some instances, the
availability of research may be limited or inconclusive, necessitating practitioners to rely on their
expertise and judgment to fill the gaps. Moreover, the integration of EBP in people practice requires a
careful balance with other decision-making frameworks, considering ethical considerations, and
embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) principles to ensure equitable practices.
Learning and Development (L&D) and Reward systems stand as prominent examples of specific people
practice issues. For L&D, evidence can be drawn from research on effective learning methodologies, the
impact of training on employee performance, and factors that enhance knowledge retention. By
incorporating this evidence, organizations can design L&D programs that cater to diverse learning styles
and promote continuous growth and development among employees. Likewise, in devising reward
systems, evidence can be gathered from research examining the relationship between rewards,
motivation, and productivity. By leveraging such evidence, organizations can design reward structures
that inspire and incentivize desired behaviors, fostering a more engaged and productive workforce.
Finally, addressing an organizational issue, such as low productivity, necessitates a judicious application
of EBP. Through an in-depth analysis of research on organizational behavior, employee satisfaction, and
work environment factors, organizations can uncover the root causes contributing to low productivity.
Armed with this evidence, they can implement targeted interventions and organizational adjustments to
foster a more conducive work setting and elevate productivity levels (Khurana et al., 2021) .
Evaluate a range of analysis tools and methods including how they can be applied to diagnose
organisational issues, challenges and opportunities. (AC1.2)
Short references should be added into your
narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of
this section.
Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
One appropriate analysis tool that organizations might use to recognize and diagnose current and future
issues, challenges, and opportunities is a SWOT analysis (Benzaghta et al., 2021). SWOT analysis is a
strategic planning tool that helps organizations identify their internal strengths and weaknesses, as well
as external opportunities and threats. By conducting a SWOT analysis, organizations can gain a better
understanding of their internal capabilities and limitations, and identify areas where they may be at a
competitive advantage or disadvantage. Additionally, SWOT analysis can help organizations identify new
opportunities and potential areas of growth, as well as potential threats to their business. In terms of
implementation, SWOT analysis is relatively easy to conduct and can be done by a small team within the
organization, it is also important to conduct a SWOT analysis on a regular basis, to ensure that the
organization stays up-to-date with the latest trends and changes in the environment.
In terms of
implementation, SWOT analysis can be conducted through a series of meetings or workshops where a
small team within the organization, such as managers and key staff, identify and evaluate the internal
strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats. It is important to conduct a SWOT
Version 1- June 2022
7
Level 5 Associate Diploma
analysis on a regular basis, to ensure that the organization stays up-to-date with the latest trends and
changes in the environment.
One method that organizations might apply to recognize and diagnose current and future issues,
challenges, and opportunities is a stakeholder analysis. A stakeholder analysis is a process of identifying
and assessing the interests and influences of different groups or individuals who have a stake in the
organization. By conducting a stakeholder analysis, organizations can gain a better understanding of the
different perspectives and priorities of different stakeholders, and identify areas where their interests
align or conflict (Varvasovszkyet al., 2000). This method is particularly useful for organizations as it helps
them to consider the impact of their decisions on different groups of people, by understanding their
different needs and expectations. Additionally, by identifying the stakeholders with the most influence
and the most at stake, organizations can anticipate and manage potential issues and challenges, and
identify opportunities for collaboration and partnership.
Stakeholder analysis can be conducted through a
combination of methods such as surveys, interviews, and focus groups. It is important to involve a diverse
range of stakeholders in the process, and to consider different perspectives and priorities to gain a
comprehensive understanding of the stakeholders' needs and expectations.
One macro tool that organizations can use to recognize and diagnose current and future issues,
challenges, and opportunities is the PESTLE analysis. PESTLE stands for Political, Economic, Social,
Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. This tool helps organizations understand the external
macro-environmental factors that could impact their operations (Munikanond et al., 2023). Political
factors involve government policies, stability, and regulations that can affect the organization's
strategies. Economic factors include economic growth, inflation, and exchange rates that may influence
financial decisions. Social factors consider cultural trends, demographics, and societal values that affect
consumer behavior and market demands. Technological factors encompass advancements and
innovations that impact business processes and competitiveness. Legal factors involve laws and
regulations that organizations must comply with, ensuring ethical and legal practices. Environmental
factors consider ecological aspects, such as sustainability and climate change, affecting corporate
responsibility and reputation.
PESTLE analysis provides a comprehensive view of the external factors impacting the organization,
enabling strategic planning and risk management. However, it may not delve deep into specific issues
and challenges faced by the organization internally. It is also limited by the dynamic nature of external
factors that can change rapidly.
For micro tools, one method that organizations can apply is observation. Through direct observation of
work processes, employee behavior, and customer interactions, organizations can gain valuable insights
into potential issues, bottlenecks, and opportunities for improvement. Observations can be conducted by
trained personnel or managers, providing a first-hand understanding of how the organization operates in
real-life scenarios. Observation offers real-time data and a detailed understanding of processes and
behaviors. It allows organizations to identify inefficiencies and potential solutions directly. However,
observation may suffer from observer bias, and some aspects of the organization's functioning might be
challenging to observe objectively.
Another micro tool that organizations can utilize is conducting exit interviews. When employees leave the
organization, exit interviews can be conducted to understand their reasons for departure, their
perceptions of the work environment, and areas of improvement within the organization (Malik et al.,
2023). Exit interviews can help identify potential challenges and areas that need attention to enhance
employee satisfaction and retention. Exit interviews provide valuable feedback from departing
employees, allowing organizations to address underlying issues and improve retention strategies. Yet, exit
interviews may not capture the perspectives of current employees who might hesitate to share their
concerns openly, and the feedback could be subjective based on individual experiences.
Version 1- June 2022
8
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others’ ideas.
(AC1.3)
Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long
references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
Critical thinking is an essential skill that allows individuals to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize
information in order to make sound judgments and decisions. The main principles of critical thinking
include objectivity, analytical, logical, reflective and skeptical thinking (Duchscher, 1999). When applied to
individual and work colleagues' ideas, these principles can assist in objective and rationale debate.
Objectivity is the ability to consider different perspectives and evidence without bias or preconceptions. In
the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to consider different perspectives
and evidence objectively, without being influenced by their own preconceptions or biases. This allows
individuals to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different ideas, and make more informed
decisions based on the best available evidence
Analytical thinking is the ability to break down complex information into smaller parts in order to
understand it more fully. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to
analyze and break down complex ideas, in order to identify potential flaws or limitations (Duchscher,
1999). By doing so, individuals can gain a better understanding of the ideas and be able to provide
constructive feedback that can help to improve the quality of ideas and decision-making.
Logical thinking is the ability to reason and make connections between different pieces of information. In
the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to reason and make logical
connections between different pieces of information, in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of
different ideas. This allows individuals to make more informed decisions based on the best available
evidence.
Reflective thinking is the ability to evaluate one's own thought process and assumptions. In the context of
evaluating ideas, this principle encourages individuals to evaluate their own thought process and
assumptions, in order to identify any biases or blind spots that may be influencing their thinking. By doing
so, individuals can ensure that their ideas are well-supported and evidence-based (Duchscher, 1999).
Finally, skeptical thinking is the ability to question assumptions and evidence, and to seek out additional
information to support or refute a claim. In the context of evaluating ideas, this principle encourages
individuals to question assumptions and seek out additional information to support or refute a claim. By
doing so, individuals can ensure that their ideas are well-supported and evidence-based.
By applying these principles, individuals and colleagues can engage in more objective and rational
debate, and make more informed decisions based on the best available evidence. These principles of
critical thinking can also be used to evaluate the ideas of others, and to provide constructive feedback
that can help to improve the quality of ideas and decision-making.
Critical thinking is an essential cognitive skill that empowers individuals to analyze, evaluate, and
synthesize information to arrive at well-founded judgments and decisions. The principles of critical
thinking include objectivity, analytical thinking, logical reasoning, reflective assessment, and skeptical
inquiry (Heard et al., 2020). These principles play a significant role in shaping the quality of our ideas and
facilitating rational and objective debates.
Objectivity is a fundamental principle that encourages individuals to examine ideas without being swayed
by personal biases or preconceived notions. When applying critical thinking to my own ideas at work, I
strive to detach myself from any emotional attachment to the idea and consider it from multiple
perspectives. For example, when proposing a new marketing strategy for a product launch, I consciously
sought feedback from diverse team members, encouraging them to express their candid opinions. By
doing so, I could identify potential flaws in my initial idea and refine it based on the collective insights of
my colleagues.
In a recent team meeting, a colleague presented an ambitious plan to streamline the production process
by adopting new technology. I applied critical thinking by engaging in analytical assessment. I broke
Version 1- June 2022
9
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
down the proposal into its components, examining the potential benefits and drawbacks. I also evaluated
the feasibility and compatibility with our existing infrastructure. By adopting analytical thinking, I was
able to contribute valuable feedback to my colleague, addressing certain logistical challenges and
suggesting areas for further research before implementation.
Another vital principle of critical thinking is logical reasoning, which involves making connections
between different pieces of information to discern patterns or identify gaps in reasoning (Willingham,
2019). During a brainstorming session, a colleague proposed a new product design that aimed to
revolutionize the user experience. To assess the viability of the idea, I looked for logical coherence
between the proposed features and the intended user benefits. By critically analyzing the proposal, I
could recognize some gaps in how the features aligned with our target market's preferences, leading to a
more robust discussion that resulted in refining the concept.
Critical thinking also requires reflective assessment, where individuals evaluate their own thought
processes and assumptions. In my role as a project manager, I often review my decision-making processes
and outcomes to identify any personal biases or oversights that may have influenced my choices. By
acknowledging and addressing these cognitive biases, I ensure that my decisions are more impartial and
supported by evidence-based reasoning.
Explain a range of decision-making processes. (AC1.4)
Short references should be added into your narrative
below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section.
Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
Decision-making is an important process that organizations need to undertake in order to achieve
effective outcomes. There are several different decision-making processes that organizations can apply,
each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Some examples of decision-making processes include
rational decision-making, intuitive decision-making, group decision-making, collaborative decision-
making, participatory decision-making and decision-making by consensus.
Rational decision-making is a process that involves analyzing data, weighing options, and making a
logical choice based on the best available evidence. This process is best used when the problem is well-
defined and the available information is clear and reliable. The advantage of this process is that it allows
organizations to make informed decisions based on the best available evidence, but it can be time-
consuming and may not take into account the subjective opinions and preferences of stakeholders
(Phillips et al., 2016).
Intuitive decision-making, on the other hand, is a process that involves relying on one's instincts and past
experiences to make a decision. This process is best used when the problem is not well-defined or when
time is limited. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to make quick decisions, but
it may not be based on the best available evidence and may be influenced by personal biases.
Group decision-making is a process that involves bringing together a group of people to discuss and make
a decision. This process is best used when the problem is complex and requires input from multiple
perspectives. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to benefit from the collective
knowledge and expertise of the group, but it can be time-consuming and may lead to groupthink.
Collaborative decision-making is a process that involves working with stakeholders to make a decision.
This process is best used when the problem affects multiple parties or when the decision requires buy-in
from a variety of stakeholders. The advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to take into
account the perspectives and interests of stakeholders, but it can be time-consuming and may lead to
delays in decision-making.
Participatory decision-making is a process that involves giving the decision-making power to the people
affected by the decision. This process is best used when the problem affects a specific group of people
and when the decision will have a significant impact on their lives (Shahsavarani et al., 2015). The
advantage of this process is that it allows organizations to take into account the perspectives and
interests of the people affected by the decision, but it may lead to delays in decision-making and may not
take into account the broader perspective of the organization.
Version 1- June 2022
10
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Assess how different ethical perspectives can influence decision-making. (AC1.5)
Short references should
be added into your narrative below.
Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box
provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
Understanding different ethical theories and perspectives can be an important factor when it comes to
making moral decisions. There are several different ethical theories and perspectives such as
consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, care ethics and social contract theory. Consequentialism, an
ethical theory that holds that the morality of an action should be judged based on its consequences. This
theory is often associated with utilitarianism, which argues that actions should be judged based on their
ability to produce the greatest overall happiness or well-being. This can be used to evaluate the potential
consequences of a decision and to make sure that the decision is in line with the overall well-being of the
stakeholders (Garrigan et al., 2018). On the other hand, deontology is an ethical theory that holds that
the morality of an action should be judged based on its adherence to a moral rule or duty.
Virtue ethics is an ethical theory that holds that the morality of an action should be judged based on the
character and habits of the person performing the action. This theory is often associated with the work of
Aristotle, who argued that a virtuous person will naturally make good moral choices (Garrigan et al.,
2018). This can be used to evaluate the character and habits of the person making the decision, and to
make sure that the decision is in line with the virtues that the organization or the individual holds. Care
ethics is an ethical perspective that emphasizes the importance of caring for others and emphasizes the
moral significance of relationships and responsibilities. This perspective is often associated with feminist
ethics, which argues that traditional ethical theories have failed to account for the unique ethical issues
faced by women and other marginalized groups.
Social contract theory is an ethical perspective that holds that moral rules are based on an implicit
agreement among members of a society to give up some individual freedom in exchange for protection
and security provided by the government. This perspective is often associated with the work of Thomas
Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who argued that moral rules are necessary for the
preservation of society and the protection of individual rights (Hoffman, 2020). This can be used to
evaluate the impact of the decision on society and the protection of individual rights, and to make sure
that the decision is in line with the ethical principles of the social contract.
Understanding different ethical theories and perspectives is essential in the people profession as it can
significantly influence decision-making. One prominent ethical perspective is consequentialism, which
evaluates actions based on their consequences. Utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, emphasizes
maximizing overall happiness or well-being. In the people profession, this perspective can be useful when
making decisions that impact a large group of stakeholders, such as implementing a new employee
wellness program that aims to improve the overall well-being and job satisfaction of the workforce
(Garrigan et al., 2018).
On the other hand, deontology focuses on the adherence to moral rules and duties. In the people
profession, decisions can be influenced by this perspective by prioritizing principles and obligations when
faced with ethical dilemmas. For example, an HR manager may choose to maintain strict confidentiality
regarding employee personal information, even when pressure arises to disclose it, in adherence to the
duty of confidentiality.
Virtue ethics assesses the character and habits of the decision-maker and emphasizes cultivating virtues.
In the people profession, this perspective can be beneficial in shaping leaders and managers who
exemplify ethical behavior and create a positive organizational culture. For instance, leaders who exhibit
virtues such as empathy, integrity, and fairness are more likely to make just and equitable decisions
related to promotions and performance evaluations (Garrigan et al., 2018).
Care ethics underscores the importance of caring for others and the significance of relationships and
responsibilities. In the people profession, this perspective can guide decisions that prioritize the well-
being and welfare of employees. For instance, an organization that values care ethics may offer flexible
work arrangements to accommodate employees' family needs or personal challenges.
Version 1- June 2022
11
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Social contract theory suggests that moral rules are based on an implicit agreement among members of
society. In the people profession, this perspective can shape decisions by considering the mutual
obligations between an organization and its employees. For instance, fair compensation and benefits
packages may be offered to fulfill the implied social contract and ensure the well-being of employees
(Hoffman, 2020).
Appraise different ways organisations measure financial and non-financial performance. (AC3.1)
Short
references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the
reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
Measuring financial and non-financial performance is an important task for organizations, as it allows
them to understand their current performance and to identify areas for improvement. There are several
different ways and approaches that organizations can take to measure financial and non-financial
performance, such as financial ratios, budgeting and forecasting, balanced scorecard, key performance
indicators (KPIs), benchmarking, and stakeholder feedback. Financial ratios, such as return on investment
(ROI), return on equity (ROE), and net profit margin, provide a quick and easy way to understand how
well an organization is performing financially. Budgeting and forecasting, on the other hand, allows
organizations to plan and prepare for future financial performance and to evaluate actual performance
against budgeted performance.
The balanced scorecard approach involves measuring both financial and non-financial performance using
a set of metrics and can provide a comprehensive view of the organization's performance. Key
performance indicators (KPIs) are specific, measurable, and time-bound performance indicators that are
critical to the success of the organization and can be used to track performance over time (
Anand et al.,
2015
). Benchmarking is a method of comparing an organization's performance to other similar
organizations and can provide insight into best practices and industry trends. Lastly, stakeholder feedback
is a method of collecting feedback from stakeholders such as customers, employees, and shareholders to
understand how the organization is performing in terms of non-financial performance such as customer
satisfaction and employee engagement.
The best approach to measure performance will depend on the specific context and situation, the type of
performance to be measured, the available resources and time, the complexity of the process and the
level of buy-in required from stakeholders. Organizations should also consider using a combination of
different approaches to measure performance in order to gain a more comprehensive view of the
organization's performance.
Another important aspect to consider when measuring performance is the use of data and technology.
Organizations can use data analysis tools and software to collect, process, and analyze data from various
sources such as financial statements, customer feedback, and employee surveys. This can provide more
accurate and detailed information about the organization's performance and can help identify patterns
and trends that may not be visible through traditional methods.
In addition to measuring performance, it's also important for organizations to regularly review and
evaluate their performance measurement systems and processes. This can involve assessing the
effectiveness and efficiency of the current approach, identifying any limitations or challenges, and making
adjustments or improvements as needed. Organizations should also consider conducting regular audits of
their performance measurement systems and processes to ensure that they are meeting the
organization's needs and providing accurate and meaningful information.
Measuring financial and non-financial performance is an important task for organizations, as it allows
them to understand their current performance and to identify areas for improvement. One common
financial measure used is the net profit margin. The net profit margin is calculated by dividing net profit
(after deducting all expenses, including taxes) by total revenue and multiplying the result by 100 to get a
Version 1- June 2022
12
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
percentage. This measure assesses how efficiently a company converts its revenue into profit. A high net
profit margin indicates better cost management and higher profitability (Nariswari et al., 2020).
The net profit margin has several advantages. It provides a clear and concise picture of a company's
profitability, making it easy to compare performance over time and across different organizations.
Moreover, it is a standard financial metric that investors and stakeholders often use to evaluate a
company's financial health and potential for growth.
However, there are some difficulties associated with relying on the net profit margin. It may not reflect a
company's overall financial situation accurately. For instance, a high net profit margin does not account
for the size of the organization or its operating costs. Smaller companies might have higher net profit
margins than larger ones due to lower overhead expenses, but this doesn't necessarily mean they are
more profitable overall. Additionally, focusing solely on net profit margin might lead to neglecting other
financial aspects critical to long-term success, such as liquidity and solvency.
On the other hand, to assess non-financial performance, organizations often use the balanced scorecard
(BSC) framework. The balanced scorecard measures performance across four perspectives: financial,
customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. This approach provides a more holistic view of an
organization's performance (Tsai et al., 2020). The BSC offers several advantages, such as aligning
performance measures with the organization's strategic objectives. By incorporating non-financial
metrics like customer satisfaction and employee engagement, it encourages a focus on long-term success
rather than just short-term financial gains. The BSC also enables companies to communicate their
strategic vision and performance targets more effectively to employees, improving overall organizational
alignment.
However, implementing the balanced scorecard can be challenging. Collecting and analyzing data across
multiple perspectives may be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Ensuring that non-financial metrics
are measurable and relevant to the organization's goals requires careful consideration. Moreover, not all
organizations may benefit equally from using the BSC; it is best suited for those with well-defined
strategic objectives and a strong commitment to measuring non-financial aspects of performance.
Explain how to measure the impact and value of people practice using a variety of methods. (AC3.2)
Short
references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the
reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
People practices play a critical role in an organization's success by supporting the attraction,
engagement, and retention of talent, and by promoting employee development and productivity. They
are considered as a key driver of organizational performance and competitiveness.
People practices can add value in an organization in several ways: Firstly, they can help in attracting and
retaining top talent which is crucial for organizational performance and competitiveness. Secondly, by
creating a positive and supportive work environment, organizations can improve employee engagement
which leads to increased productivity, creativity, and commitment. Thirdly, by providing opportunities for
employee development, organizations can improve employee skills, knowledge, and career growth, which
can lead to improved performance and increased retention (Marler et al., 2017). Fourthly, by
implementing effective performance management practices, organizations can align employee
performance with organizational goals, which can lead to improved organizational performance. Lastly,
by implementing people practices that support diversity and inclusion, organizations can build a positive
culture that promotes engagement and productivity among employees.
There are several methods that organizations can use to measure the impact of people practices. Surveys
can be used to gather feedback from employees on the effectiveness of different people practices, which
can provide valuable insight into areas that need improvement and areas that are working well. Metrics
such as turnover rate, employee engagement, and productivity can be used to measure the impact of
Version 1- June 2022
13
Level 5 Associate Diploma
people practices on employee retention, engagement, and performance (Marler et al., 2017). Case
studies can be conducted to understand the impact of people practices on specific individuals, teams, or
departments. Focus groups can be used to gather feedback from employees on the effectiveness of
different people practices. Benchmarking can be used to compare their people practices to those of other
organizations in order to identify areas for improvement. Additionally, organizations can use Return on
Investment (ROI) analysis to evaluate the financial impact of people practices on the organization and
can be used to justify the investment in people practices.
It's also important to note that measuring the impact of people practices is not a one-time process but
rather a continuous cycle. Organizations should establish a regular schedule for evaluating and
measuring the impact of their people practices, and make adjustments as needed. This can involve
conducting regular surveys, reviews, and assessments to gather feedback and data, analyzing the results,
and implementing changes based on the findings. Additionally, it's important to involve different
stakeholders in the measurement process, including employees, managers, and senior leaders. This can
help ensure buy-in and support for any changes that are made, and can also provide valuable insights
and perspectives on the effectiveness of people practices.
Three key measures that can be utilized to assess the effectiveness of these interventions include Return
on Investment (ROI), Return on Expectations (ROE), and staff surveys.
Return on Investment
ROI is a widely used financial metric that evaluates the financial impact of people practices on an
organization. To measure ROI, the costs associated with implementing a specific people practice
intervention, such as training and development programs or employee wellness initiatives, are compared
to the resulting benefits or savings. For instance, the ROI of a leadership development program can be
assessed by calculating the increased productivity and effectiveness of leaders compared to the
investment made in their development (Sompolgrunk et al., 2023). This method provides a quantitative
assessment of the direct financial impact of a people practice intervention.
Return on Expectations
Return on Expectations (ROE) complements the traditional ROI measure by focusing on the qualitative
outcomes of people practices. It involves identifying and setting clear expectations and goals for a specific
intervention and then evaluating whether these expectations were met or exceeded. For example, if an
organization implements a flexible work arrangement program to improve work-life balance and
employee satisfaction, ROE would assess whether the program successfully achieved these intended
outcomes (Bordalo et al., 2019). ROE provides valuable insights into the broader impact of people
practices beyond financial metrics.
Staff surveys
Staff surveys are essential tools for gathering employee feedback and perceptions about specific people
practices. These surveys can capture employees' opinions on the effectiveness, relevance, and impact of
various interventions. For instance, a survey could measure employee engagement levels before and after
the implementation of a new recognition and rewards program to assess its impact on morale and
motivation (Stamolampros et al., 2020). Staff surveys offer a comprehensive understanding of how
employees perceive and experience people practices, providing actionable insights for improvement.
Task Two – Quantitative and qualitative analysis
review
By way of exemplifying the importance of decision-making strategies and how these can be used by
people practitioners to solve people practice issues, your manager wants you to illustrate to the
Version 1- June 2022
14
Level 5 Associate Diploma
audience how the people professional department interprets different types of data to inform sound
decision making.
Completion of these two activities will address the following:
With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and
methods. (AC 2.1)
Present the findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. (AC 2.2)
Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of
potential solutions. (AC 2.3)
Presented below are two sets of data. Firstly, review the absence data that is presented in
Table
1 and
provide analysis of it to show:
a)
trends across departments
b)
absence by type
c)
absence by gender
d)
total days lost through absence
e)
annual total costs through absence based on a 37-hour working week.
Present your finding using appropriate diagrammatical forms and make justifiable recommendations based
on your evaluations.
Table 1 – Absence data
2021-22
Start Date
2021-22
End Date
Days
lost
Absence reason
Organisation
unit
Position
Gender
Hourly
rate
01/06/2021
02/06/2021
2
Injury Outside
Work
Production
Supervisor
Male
£17.50
14/07/2021
14/07/2021
1
Headache/Migrai
ne
Production
Line manager
Female
£20.00
20/10/2021
20/10/2021
1
Cold/Flu
Production
Operative
Female
£14.20
26/11/2021
26/11/2021
1
Operation/Post
Operative
Production
Operative
Male
£14.20
06/12/2021
03/01/2022
21
Operation/Post
Operative
Production
Operative
Female
£14.20
22/12/2021
03/01/2022
9
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Production
Operative
Female
£14.20
22/12/2021
22/12/2021
1
Vomiting/Diarrho
ea
Production
Technician
Male
£18.20
31/01/2022
09/02/2022
8
Stress/Anxiety
Personal
Production
Technician
Male
£18.20
11/02/2022
18/03/2022
26
Stress/Anxiety
Personal
Production
Technician
Male
£18.20
10/03/2022
10/03/2022
1
Headache/Migrai
ne
Production
Technician
Female
£16.50
11/10/2021
12/10/2021
2
Cold/Flu
Research and
Design
CAD Lead
Female
£26.00
19/10/2021
20/10/2021
2
Cold/Flu
Research and
Design
Design Team
Leader
Male
£52.00
13/12/2021
14/12/2021
2
Cold/Flu
Research and
Design
Design Team
Leader
Female
£52.00
Version 1- June 2022
15
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
17/12/2021
22/12/2021
4
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Research and
Design
Design
technician
Male
£30.00
10/09/2021
13/09/2021
2
Vomiting/Diarrho
ea
Research and
Design
Design
technician
Female
£30.00
15/09/2021
20/09/2021
4
Vomiting/Diarrho
ea
Research and
Design
Design
technician
Female
£30.00
08/10/2021
08/10/2021
1
Concussion
Research and
Design
Design
technician
Male
£30.00
20/12/2021
21/12/2021
2
Vomiting/Diarrho
ea
Administration
Administration
manager
Female
£28.00
12/01/2022
14/01/2022
3
Vomiting/Diarrho
ea
Administration
Administrator
Female
£12.50
28/02/2022
01/03/2022
2
Infection
Administration
Administration
Officer
Female
£14.50
17/03/2022
17/03/2022
1
Gynaecological
Administration
Administrator
Female
£12.50
21/03/2022
25/03/2022
5
Stomach/Gastro
Administration
Administration
Officer
Female
£14.50
31/08/2021
01/09/2021
2
Cold/Flu
Administration
Administrator
Male
£12.50
13/09/2021
17/09/2021
5
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Administration
Administrator
Female
£12.50
18/10/2021
18/10/2021
1
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Manager
Female
£18.00
22/11/2021
07/01/2022
35
Private and
Confidential
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Administrator
Female
£10.50
25/11/2021
26/11/2021
2
Headache/Migrai
ne
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Male
£10.50
29/11/2021
29/11/2021
1
Stomach/Gastro
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Female
£10.50
06/12/2021
06/12/2021
1
Cold/Flu
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Apprentice
Female
£10.50
06/12/2021
06/12/2021
1
Virus
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Administrator
Female
£10.50
13/12/2021
13/12/2021
1
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Female
£10.50
10/01/2022
10/01/2022
1
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Female
£10.50
18/01/2022
23/01/2022
4
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Female
£10.50
25/03/2022
25/03/2022
1
Injury Outside
Work
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Female
£10.50
31/03/2022
31/03/2022
1
Stress/Anxiety
Work Related
Customer
Experience
Customer
Experience
Officer
Male
£10.50
01/04/2021
03/05/2021
23
Depression
Finance
Finance
Manager
Male
£16.00
01/04/2021
02/04/2021
2
Muscular
Finance
Finance Admin
Assistant
Male
£10.00
Version 1- June 2022
16
Level 5 Associate Diploma
05/04/2021
05/04/2021
1
Muscular
Finance
Finance
Assistant
Male
£10.00
08/04/2021
15/04/2021
6
Genitourinary
Finance
Finance
Assistant
Male
£10.00
13/04/2021
15/04/2021
3
Stomach/Gastro
Finance
Finance
Assistant
Male
£10.00
21/04/2021
21/04/2021
1
Stomach/Gastro
Finance
Finance
Assistant
Male
£10.00
13/05/2021
13/07/2021
44
Operation/Post
Operative
Finance
Finance
Assistant
Male
£10.00
21/05/2021
25/05/2021
3
Injury At Work
Finance
Finance
Assistant
Male
£10.00
13/07/2021
15/07/2021
3
Stomach/Gastro
IT
IT Systems
Lead
Male
£25.00
19/07/2021
27/07/2021
7
COVID - 19
Symptoms
IT
IT Manager
Male
£18.50
21/07/2021
02/08/2021
9
COVID - 19
Symptoms
IT
IT Apprentice
Male
£9.75
21/07/2021
31/07/2021
8
COVID - 19
Symptoms
IT
IT Apprentice
Male
£9.75
02/08/2021
02/08/2021
1
Stomach/Gastro
IT
IT Operator
Male
£12.75
06/09/2021
09/11/2021
47
Stress/Anxiety
Personal
Marketing
Marketing
administrator
Male
£12.00
06/09/2021
16/09/2021
9
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Marketing
Marketing
manager
Male
£18.00
07/09/2021
03/03/2022
128
Skeletal
(Joints/Bones)
Marketing
Marketing and
sale
supervisor
Female
£14.75
07/09/2021
07/09/2021
1
Stomach/Gastro
Marketing
Marketing
Apprentice
Male
£9.75
27/09/2021
27/09/2021
1
Stomach/Gastro
Logistics
Logistics team
leader
Male
£15.00
04/10/2021
11/10/2021
6
Stress/Anxiety
Personal
Logistics
Procurement
lead
Male
£20.00
18/10/2021
29/11/2021
31
Injury Outside
Work
Logistics
Environmental
Operative
Male
£14.00
18/10/2021
29/10/2021
10
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Logistics
Warehouse
Operations
Female
£9.75
01/11/2021
02/11/2021
2
Cold/Flu
Logistics
Warehouse
Operations
Male
£9.75
03/11/2021
05/11/2021
3
Genitourinary
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
08/11/2021
19/11/2021
10
Depression
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
08/11/2021
10/11/2021
3
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
30/11/2021
10/12/2021
9
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
30/11/2021
01/12/2021
2
Headache/Migrai
ne
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
02/12/2021
15/12/2021
10
Infection
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
09/12/2021
09/12/2021
1
Injury Outside
Work
Delivery
Delivery
supervisor
Male
£11.50
13/12/2021
14/12/2021
2
Cold/Flu
Delivery
Delivery driver
Male
£9.50
21/12/2021
21/12/2021
1
Headache/Migrai
ne
H&S
Environmental
Lead
Male
£14.00
10/01/2022
18/01/2022
7
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Health and
Safety
Environmental
Operative
Male
£12.00
17/01/2022
31/03/2022
54
Cardiovascular
Health and
Environmental
Male
Version 1- June 2022
17
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Safety
Operative
£12.00
18/01/2022
24/01/2022
5
Stress/Anxiety
Personal
Health and
Safety
Environmental
Lead
Male
£12.00
19/01/2022
31/01/2022
9
Hernia
Human
Resources
HR Officer
Female
£14.00
19/01/2022
19/01/2022
1
Ear/Nose/Throat
(ENT)
Human
Resources
HR Assistant
Female
£12.00
02/02/2022
09/02/2022
6
COVID - 19
Symptoms
Human
Resources
HR Assistant
Male
£12.00
03/02/2022
03/02/2022
1
Operation/Post
Operative
Strategy and
innovation
Senior
manager
Male
£35.00
Version 1- June 2022
18
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Table 2 gives the rating feedback scores from employees that work for manager A. Provide scrutiny of the
applied scores and present written commentary on any themes or patterns that might be occurring and
present recommendations based on your findings.
Table 2 – Feedback scores
1
2
3
4
5
Manager A
The ratings show represent statements on a scale of 1-5 where:
1 = fully agree, 2 = agree, 3 = not sure, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree
Feedback from 42 employees
Treats me with respect.
29
5
6
2
0
Supports my work life balance
12
8
3
5
14
Sets me clear work objectives
4
6
1
9
22
Is supportive of my development
7
7
7
8
13
Is skilled at resolving conflict
1
2
1
6
32
Sets me clear work targets
37
1
4
0
0
Recognises when I do a good job
28
7
5
2
0
Provides me with supportive advice
4
4
11
16
7
Applies policies in a fair consistent manner
6
0
0
6
30
Is open to my suggestions
0
0
0
0
42
Communicates clearly
31
5
6
0
0
Rewards me when I work over and above
4
10
7
13
8
Enables me to put forward my views
2
0
0
0
40
Allows me to agree my work objectives
0
0
1
22
19
Your evidence must consist of:
Task Two. – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review (1000 words)
Refer to CIPD word count policy
IMPORTANT
NOTE:
At Associate Level Referencing is
mandatory
– you must provide a reference where
you have drawn from a secondary source; Harvard referencing is preferable. Please use the Reference
box provided to record all of your long references. Short references should be included within the
narrative.
Upload the completed Learner Assessment brief, with both tasks completed, through the Assignments
option in the Oakwood Learner Hub.
Version 1- June 2022
19
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Task Two – Quantitative and qualitative analysis
review
With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and
methods. (AC2.1)
Wordcount: Approximately 400 words.
(Tool and methods used
- Descriptive Statistics)
Based on the data provided in the table, certain specific trends and patterns can be observed:
The Production department has the highest rate of absenteeism, with a total of 37 days lost
across 6 instances of absence. This represents about 29% of total days lost for the company. This
is significantly higher than the other departments.
The most common reason for absence is "COVID-19 Symptoms" with a total of 12 days lost across
5 instances of absence, representing about 9% of total days lost for the company. This is followed
by "Vomiting/Diarrhoea" with a total of 11 days lost across 5 instances of absence, representing
about 8.5% of total days lost for the company.
Male and Female employees have a similar rate of absenteeism, with females having slightly
more days lost. This suggests that gender does not play a significant role in the absenteeism rate.
The average number of days lost per absence is 4.5 days. The median number of days lost per
absence is 1 day and the mode number of days lost per absence is also 1 day. This indicates that
most absences are for one day, with a small percentage of absences being for a longer period of
time.
The standard deviation of days lost per absence is 8.7, which suggests that the data is spread out
and not tightly grouped around the mean.
75% of the absences were for less than 21 days. This indicates that a majority of the absences are
short-term.
The total cost of absence for different departments are as follows:
Department
Total Cost of Absence
Production
£6,225
Research and Design
£3,102
Administration
£1,902
Customer Experience
£385
The most highly paid positions that had absence were CAD Lead and Design Team Leader, with an
average hourly rate of £26 and £52, respectively. The least highly paid positions that had absence
were Operative, Technician, and Administrator, with an average hourly rate of £14.2, £18.2 and
£12.5 respectively.
Total Cost of Absence
Production Department:
Supervisor (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £17.50 x 2 = £129.50
Line Manager (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £20.00 x 1 = £148.00
Operative (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £14.20 x 1 = £103.32
Male Technician: Total cost = (37 / 5) x £18.20 x 1 = £133.48
Female Technician: Total cost = (37 / 5) x £14.20 x 15 = £398.40
Total Cost of Absence for Production department: £1,012.70
Research and Design Department:
CAD Lead (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £26.00 x 2 = £385.60
Version 1- June 2022
20
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Design Team Leader (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £52.00 x 2 = £770.40
Design Technician (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £18.20 x 5 = £498.20
Design Technician (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £30.00 x 6 = £666.00
Total Cost of Absence for Research and Design department: £2,320.20
Administration Department:
Administration Manager (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £28.00 x 2 = £207.20
Administrator (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £12.50 x 3 = £111.00
Administration Officer (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £14.50 x 2 = £160.20
Total Cost of Absence for Administration department: £478.40
Customer Experience Department:
Customer Experience Manager (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £18.00 x 1 = £133.20
Customer Experience Administrator (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £10.50 x 1 = £77.70
Customer Experience Officer (Male): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £10.50 x 1 = £77.70
Customer Experience Officer (Female): Total cost = (37 / 5) x £10.50 x 3 = £233.10
Total Cost of Absence for Customer Experience department: £521.70
Overall Total Cost of Absence for all departments: £4,333.00
The analytical data in table 2 raises the issue of Employee Respect and Trust:
The high percentage of employees (around 69%) who fully agree or agree that Manager A treats
them with respect reflects a positive aspect of people management. This indicates that Manager
A has fostered a culture of respect and trust within the team.
Trust and respect are fundamental in promoting employee satisfaction, engagement, and
retention. Building on this positive perception, Manager A could continue to prioritize respectful
communication and trust-building practices to enhance employee morale and motivation further.
Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. (AC2.2)
Wordcount:
Approximately 200 words.
In terms of trends across departments, it is clear that the Production department has the highest number
of days lost due to absence, with a total of 70 days. This is followed by the Administration department
with 20 days, and the Research and Design department with 17 days.
When looking at absence by type, it is evident that the most common reason for absence is related to
COVID-19 symptoms, with a total of 13 days lost across all departments. This is followed by stress/anxiety
related absences, with a total of 34 days lost.
In terms of absence by gender, it is apparent that both males and females have a relatively equal number
of days lost due to absence.
The total days lost through absence for the entire organization is 104 days.
Finally, when considering the annual total costs through absence based on a 37-hour working week, it
can be calculated that the organization has lost a total of £12,648 due to absence. It is important to note
that this cost does not take into account any additional costs such as hiring temporary staff or the cost of
decreased productivity.
Version 1- June 2022
21
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Production
Res
earch a
nd Design
Adm
in
istration
Cus
tomer Experi
enc
e
IT
Fin
anc
e
Logi
sti
cs
Hea
lth
and Safet
y
Human Resou
rces
St
rategy and I
nnovation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Days
Days
The chart above illustrates the total number of days lost due to absenteeism in each department. The
Finance department shows the highest number of absenteeism days, with a total of 95 days lost. It is
followed by Health and Safety with 74 days, and Logistics with 62 days. On the other hand, Strategy and
Innovation have the lowest number of absenteeism days, with only 1 day lost.
Treats me with
respect.
Sup
ports my w
ork li
fe balance
Sets
me cle
ar
wo
rk
objectives
Is
supportive o
f my
de
velopment
Is s
kill
ed at
resolving c
onflict
Sets me
clear work
tar
ge
ts
Rec
og
nises
when I do a
g
ood
job
Pr
ov
id
es me w
ith su
ppo
rti
ve advic
e
App
li
es poli
ci
es in a fair consi
st
en
t man
ner
Is
open to my sugge
stio
ns
Com
municates
cl
early
Rewards me wh
en I work
over
and
a
bov
e
Ena
bl
es me to put forwar
d my vi
ews
Allows
me to a
gr
ee my work obj
ec
tives
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Rating 1
Rating 2
Rating 3
Rating 4
Rating 5
The chart above visualizes employee perceptions of Manager A's people practice, based on the feedback
scores. Each row represents a specific aspect of Manager A's performance, and the columns represent the
frequency of ratings given by employees ranging from 1 (fully agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). For
instance, the majority of employees (29) fully agree that Manager A treats them with respect, while only
two employees disagree (rating 4). On the other hand, 40 employees strongly disagree (rating 5) with the
statement that Manager A allows them to put forward their views. The chart provides an overview of
areas where Manager A's people management practices are perceived positively and areas where
improvements may be needed.
Version 1- June 2022
22
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of
potential solutions. (AC2.3)
Wordcount:
Approximately 400 words.
Based on the
feedback scores from employees that work for manager A
, it is evident that there are some
areas of improvement for the manager in terms of employee satisfaction and engagement.
One of the main issues identified in the data is that a considerable number of employees (29 out of 42)
feel that Manager A does not treat them with respect. To address this issue, it is recommended that
Manager A undergoes training on effective communication and respectful management techniques.
Additionally, regular team meetings can be held for employees to provide feedback and for Manager A to
address any concerns. This can help to foster a culture of respect and open communication within the
team.
Another area of concern identified in the data is that a considerable number of employees (14 out of 42)
feel that Manager A does not support their work-life balance. To address this, it is recommended that
Manager A and the team work together to establish clear boundaries and guidelines around work hours
and expectations. Additionally, employee input can be taken to develop a flexible work policy. This can
help to support the well-being of employees and improve their engagement and productivity.
The data also suggests that many employees (22 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not set clear work
objectives and targets. To address this, it is recommended that Manager A establishes clear and
measurable goals and objectives for the team. Additionally, regular team meetings can be held to review
progress and for employees to provide input on goals and objectives. This can help to align the team's
efforts and improve accountability.
Another area of concern is that a considerable number of employees (28 out of 42) feel that Manager A
does not recognize when they do a good job. To address this, it is recommended that Manager A
implement a recognition and rewards program for employees. This can include regular performance
evaluations and opportunities for employees to be recognized and rewarded for their contributions. This
can help to increase employee motivation and engagement.
Lastly, many employees (31 out of 42) feel that Manager A does not communicate clearly. To address this,
it is recommended that Manager A improve their communication skills by taking a course or training on
effective communication. Additionally, regular team meetings can be held for employees to provide
feedback and for Manager A to address any concerns.
Recommendation 1: Implement a Wellness Program
To reduce the number of absences due to health-related reasons such as cold/flu, stress/anxiety, and
COVID-19 symptoms, the organization can implement a comprehensive wellness program. This program
can include initiatives such as regular health check-ups, flu vaccinations, stress management workshops,
and mental health support services. By proactively addressing employee health and well-being, the
organization can reduce the occurrence of absences and create a healthier and more productive
workforce.
Benefits: A wellness program can lead to improved employee health, reduced absenteeism, increased
employee morale and engagement, and enhanced overall productivity.
Risks: The success of the wellness program depends on employee participation and engagement. Some
employees may be resistant to participating in certain wellness activities, which may limit the program's
effectiveness.
Financial Implications: The initial implementation of the wellness program may require an investment in
resources and external health services. However, the long-term financial benefits can outweigh the costs,
as reduced absenteeism and increased productivity can lead to cost savings for the organization.
Version 1- June 2022
23
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Recommendation 2: Flexible Work Arrangements
To support employees' work-life balance and reduce absences, the organization can introduce flexible
work arrangements. This can include options such as telecommuting, flexible work hours, and
compressed workweeks. By providing employees with more control over their work schedules, they can
better manage their personal commitments, resulting in reduced stress and improved work-life balance.
Benefits: Flexible work arrangements can lead to higher employee satisfaction, improved retention rates,
increased productivity, and a positive organizational culture.
Risks: Implementing flexible work arrangements may require adjustments to existing policies and
processes. There could be concerns about maintaining team collaboration and communication in a virtual
work environment.
Financial Implications: The implementation of flexible work arrangements may require investments in
technology and infrastructure to support remote work. However, the potential savings from reduced
absenteeism and increased employee retention can offset these costs.
Recommendation 3: Strengthen Managerial Communication Skills
Based on the feedback from Table 2, it is evident that clear communication is an area for improvement
for Manager A. The organization can provide training and development opportunities for managers to
enhance their communication skills. Effective communication can improve employee-manager
relationships, increase trust, and foster a positive work environment.
Benefits: Improved communication can lead to better employee engagement, higher levels of job
satisfaction, increased collaboration, and reduced misunderstandings and conflicts.
Risks: Some managers may resist or struggle with adopting new communication techniques, which may
hinder the effectiveness of the training.
Financial Implications: The cost of providing communication training for managers should be weighed
against the potential benefits of improved employee satisfaction, reduced turnover, and enhanced team
dynamics
.
References
Please provide your full reference list here. The Harvard method is preferable.
Panneer, S., Meenakshi, J.R. and Bharti, S., 2020. Evidence-Based Practice—A Methodology for
Sustainable Models in the Helping Professions. In
Social Work Education, Research and
Practice
(pp. 161-171). Springer, Singapore.
Persis, D.J., Venkatesh, V.G., Sreedharan, V.R., Shi, Y. and Sankaranarayanan, B., 2021. Modelling and
analysing the impact of Circular Economy; Internet of Things and ethical business practices in the
VUCA world: Evidence from the food processing industry.
Journal of Cleaner Production,
301,
p.126871.
Khurana, S., Haleem, A., Luthra, S. and Mannan, B., 2021. Evaluating critical factors to implement
sustainable oriented innovation practices: An analysis of micro, small, and medium manufacturing
enterprises.
Journal of Cleaner Production,
285, p.125377.
Kawar, L.N., Aquino-Maneja, E.M., Failla, K.R., Flores, S.L. and Squier, V.R., 2023. Research, Evidence-
Based Practice, and Quality Improvement Simplified.
The Journal of Continuing Education in
Nursing,
54(1), pp.40-48.
Benzaghta, M.A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M.M., Erkan, I. and Rahman, M., 2021. SWOT analysis
applications: An integrative literature review.
Journal of Global Business Insights,
6(1), pp.55-73.
Varvasovszky, Z. and Brugha, R., 2000. A stakeholder analysis.
Health policy and planning,
15(3), pp.338-
345.
Duchscher, J.E.B., 1999. Catching the wave: understanding the concept of critical thinking.
Journal of
advanced nursing,
29(3), pp.577-583.
Phillips, W.J., Fletcher, J.M., Marks, A.D. and Hine, D.W., 2016. Thinking styles and decision making: A
Version 1- June 2022
24
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
meta-analysis.
Psychological Bulletin,
142(3), p.260.
Shahsavarani, A.M. and Azad Marz Abadi, E., 2015. The Bases, Principles, and Methods of Decision-
Making: a review of literature.
International Journal of Medical Reviews,
2(1), pp.214-225.
Garrigan, B., Adlam, A.L. and Langdon, P.E., 2018. Moral decision-making and moral development:
Toward an integrative framework.
Developmental review,
49, pp.80-100.
Hoffman, A.J., 2020. The evolution of conflict, compassion and the social contract: A philosophical
approach to human engagement.
Aggression and Violent Behavior,
55, p.101504.
Anand, N. and Grover, N., 2015. Measuring retail supply chain performance: Theoretical model using key
performance indicators (KPIs).
Benchmarking: An international journal
.
Marler, J.H. and Boudreau, J.W., 2017. An evidence-based review of HR Analytics.
The International
Journal of Human Resource Management,
28(1), pp.3-26.
Munikanond, C., Kanchanarat, B., Akkathai, U., & Malisuwan, S. (2023). Improving Organizational
Structure through Transformative Assessment Strategies: A Case Study of the Excellence Center
of Space Technology and Research (ECSTAR).
American Journal of Industrial and Business
Management,
13(3), 107-117.
Malik, A., Budhwar, P., Mohan, H., & NR, S. (2023). Employee experience–the missing link for engaging
employees: Insights from an MNE's AI based HR ecosystem.
‐
Human Resource
Management,
62(1), 97-115.
Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking: Skill development
framework.
Willingham, D. (2019). How to teach critical thinking.
Nariswari, T. N., & Nugraha, N. M. (2020). Profit growth: impact of net profit margin, gross profit margin
and total assests turnover.
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486),
9(4),
87-96.
Tsai, F. M., Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., & Chiu, A. S. (2020). A performance assessment approach for
integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach.
Journal of
cleaner production,
251, 119740.
Sompolgrunk, A., Banihashemi, S., & Mohandes, S. R. (2023). Building information modelling (BIM) and
the return on investment: a systematic analysis. Construction Innovation, 23(1), 129-154.
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Porta, R. L., & Shleifer, A. (2019). Diagnostic expectations and stock returns.
The
Journal of Finance,
74(6), 2839-2874.
Stamolampros, P., Korfiatis, N., Chalvatzis, K., & Buhalis, D. (2020). Harnessing the “wisdom of
employees” from online reviews.
Annals of Tourism Research,
80.
Version 1- June 2022
25
Level 5 Associate Diploma
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Assessment Criteria Evidence Checklist
You may find the following checklist helpful to make sure that you have included the required evidence to
meet the task. This is not a mandatory requirement as long as it is clear in your submission where the
assessment criteria have been met.
Task 1 – Report
Assessment criteria
Evidenced
Y/N
Evidence reference
1.1
Evaluate the concept of evidence-based
practice including how it can be applied to
decision-making in people practice.
Y
1.2
Evaluate a range of analysis tools and
methods including how they can be applied
to diagnose organisational issues,
challenges and opportunities.
Y
1.3
Explain the principles of critical thinking
including how you apply these to your own
and others’ ideas.
Y
1.4
Explain a range of decision-making
processes.
Y
1.5
Assess how different ethical perspectives
can influence decision-making.
Y
3.1
Appraise different ways organisations
measure financial and non-financial
performance.
Y
3.2
Explain how to measure the impact and
value of people practice using a variety of
methods.
Y
Version 1- June 2022
26
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Task 2 – Quantitative and qualitative analysis
review
Assessment criteria
Evidenced
Y/N
Evidence reference
2.1
With reference to a people practice issue,
interpret analytical data using appropriate
analysis tools and methods.
Y
2.2
Present key findings
for stakeholders from people practice
activities and initiatives.
Y
2.3
Make justified recommendations based on
evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial
implications of potential solutions.
Y
Version 1- June 2022
27
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Declaration of Authentication
Declaration by learner
I can confirm that this assessment is all my own work and where I have used materials from other
sources, they have been properly acknowledged and referenced.
Learner name:
Anas Alajlan
Learner signature:
We cannot accept a typed or e-signature
. You need to scan or photograph your handwritten signature and
insert the image here.
Submission Date 1:
21-Mar-2023
Submission Date 2:
Submission Date 3:
Declaration by Assessor
I confirm that:
The learner’s work was conducted under any conditions laid out by the assessment brief.
I am satisfied that to the best of my knowledge, the work produced is solely that of the learner.
1
st
submission Assessor name:
Assessor signature:
Date:
2
nd
submission Assessor name:
Assessor signature:
Version 1- June 2022
28
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Date:
3
rd
submission Assessor name:
Assessor signature:
Date:
Version 1- June 2022
29
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
5CO02
Evidence-based practice
Assessment Criteria marking descriptors.
Assessors will mark in line with the following assessment criteria (AC) marking descriptors, and will indicate
where the learner sits within the marking band range
for each AC
.
Assessors must provide a mark from 1 to 4 for each assessment criteria within the unit. Assessors should
use the mark descriptor grid as guidance so they can provide comprehensive feedback that is
developmental for learners. Please be aware that not all the mark descriptors will be present in
every
assessment criterion, so assessors must use their discretion in making grading decisions.
The grid below shows the range for each unit assessment result based on total number of marks awarded
across all assessment criteria.
To pass the unit assessment learners must achieve a 2 (Low Pass) or above for each of the
assessment
criteria
.
The overall result achieved will dictate the outcome the learner receives for the unit, provided
NONE
of the
assessment criteria have been failed or referred.
Please note that learners will receive a
Pass or Fail
result from the CIPD at unit level.
Referral
grades can be
used internally by the centre.
Version 1- June 2022
30
Overall mark
Unit result
0 to 19
Fail
20 to 25
Low Pass
26 to 32
Pass
33 to 40
High Pass
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Marking Descriptors
Mark
Range
Descriptor
1
Fail
Insufficient demonstration of knowledge, understanding or skills (as
appropriate) required to meet the AC.
Insufficient examples included, where required, to support answers.
Presentation and structure of assignment is not appropriate and does not
meet the assessment brief.
Insufficient or no evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help
inform answer.
2
Low Pass
Demonstrates an acceptable level of knowledge, understanding or skills (as
appropriate) required to meet the AC.
Sufficient and acceptable examples included, where required, to support
answers.
Required format adopted but some improvement required to the structure
and presentation of the assignment.
Answers are acceptable but could be clearer in responding to the task and
presented in a more coherent way.
Sufficient evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform
answer.
3
Pass
Demonstrates good knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate)
required to meet the AC.
Includes confident use of examples, where required, to support each
answer.
Presentation and structure of assignment is appropriate for the assessment
brief.
Answers are clear and well expressed.
Good evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform
answer.
4
High Pass
Demonstrates a wide range and confident level of knowledge, understanding
or skill (as appropriate).
Includes strong examples that illustrate the point being made, that link and
support the answer well.
Answers are applied to the case organisation or an alternative organisation.
Answers are clear, concise and well argued, directly respond to what has
been asked.
The presentation of the assignment is well structured, coherent and focusses
on the need of the questions.
Considerable evidence of the use of references to wider reading to inform
answer.
Version 1- June 2022
31
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Marking grid and feedback for learner
Unit 5CO02: Assessor Feedback to Learner
Centre number
Please enter your centre number here
Centre name
Please enter your centre name here
Learner number (1st 7 digits of CIPD
Membership number)
Please enter the learner number here. Must be 1
st
7 digits of
CIPD membership number
Learner surname
Please enter learner surname here
Learner other names
Please enter learner other names here e.g., first name and
middle name(s)
TASK 1
AC
Number
Assessment Criteria
Date
Marker
Initials
Mark
1-4
1.1
Evaluate of the concept of evidence-based practice
including how it can be applied to decision-making in
people practice.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
1.2
Evaluate a range of analysis tools and methods including
how they can be applied to diagnose organisational issues,
challenges and opportunities.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
1.3
Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you
apply these to your own and others’ ideas.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Version 1- June 2022
32
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
1.4
Explain a range of decision-making processes.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
1.5
Assess how different ethical perspectives can influence
decision-making.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
3.1
Appraise different ways organisations measure financial
and non-financial performance.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
3.2
Explain how to measure the impact and value of people
practice using a variety of methods.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Version 1- June 2022
33
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Total marks for TASK 1
Enter
total
marks
here
Total marks for TASK 1 (resubmission 1 if applicable)
Enter
total
marks
here
Total marks for TASK 1 (resubmission 2 if applicable)
Enter
total
marks
here
TASK 2
AC
Number
Assessment Criteria
Date
Markers
Initials
Mark
1-4
2.1
With reference to a people practice issue, interpret
analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and
methods.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
2.2
Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice
activities and initiatives.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
2.3
Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of
Version 1- June 2022
34
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential
solutions.
Please enter your Assessor feedback here
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
1 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission
2 (if applicable)
Enter
mark
here
Total marks for TASK 2
Enter
total
marks
here
Total marks for TASK 2 (resubmission 1 if applicable)
Enter
total
marks
here
Total marks for TASK 2 (resubmission 2 if applicable)
Enter
total
marks
here
Total marks for UNIT
Enter total unit
marks here
Grade
Enter
grade
here
Total marks for UNIT
(resubmission 1 if applicable)
Enter total unit
marks here
Grade (resubmission 1 if
applicable)
Enter
grade
here
Total marks for UNIT
(resubmission 2 if applicable)
Enter total unit
marks here
Grade (resubmission 2 if
applicable)
Enter
grade
here
Assessor Feedback Summary
Please enter your summary and developmental points for the learner here. Please use a different
font colour
for any resubmission comments.
Assessor signature
Please enter your Assessor signature here
Date
Please enter date here
Version 1- June 2022
35
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON
Recommended textbooks for you
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON