Critical Analysis Essay guideline

docx

School

University of Toronto, Mississauga *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

387

Subject

English

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by HighnessOtter6186

Critical Analysis Essay 1. Introduction (Approx. 150-200 words)  Hook : Start with a compelling statement or statistic that highlights the importance or urgency of rethinking agricultural practices.  Background : Briefly introduce agroecology, mentioning its emergence as a response to the limitations of conventional agriculture.  Thesis Statement : Clearly state your thesis, outlining the aspects of agroecology you will explore, including its goals, strategies, strengths, weaknesses, potential, and limits.  Essay Structure Overview : Provide a brief overview of the structure of your essay to guide the reader on what to expect. 2. Agroecology Overview (Approx. 200-250 words)  Definition and Scope : Define agroecology and discuss its multidimensional nature as a science, a practice, and a movement.  Historical Context : Mention key historical developments that have shaped the agroecology movement.  Relevance as an Alternative Food Initiative : Explain why agroecology is considered an alternative food initiative, emphasizing its aims to create sustainable, equitable food systems.  Wezel et al. (2009) : Use this article to define agroecology and outline its evolution. Highlight key aspects that make agroecology a multidimensional approach, including its roles as a science, a practice, and a movement. This sets a foundational understanding for readers.

3. Critical Analysis of Agroecology (Approx. 600-700 words) Divide this section into sub-sections for clarity and depth. Goals and Strategies  Describe Specific Goals : Outline agroecology's main goals, such as enhancing biodiversity, improving soil health, and promoting food sovereignty.  Examine Strategies : Detail the strategies employed to achieve these goals, including diverse cropping systems, organic farming methods, and participatory research with local communities.  Isaac et al. (2018) : Incorporate findings from this article to discuss agroecology's implementation and challenges in Canada. It provides context on how agroecology's goals are pursued within specific national frameworks, offering insights into strategies that are effective or require adaptation.  Gianinazzi et al. (2010) : Leverage article to illustrate how the strategic use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi exemplifies agroecology's commitment to enhancing biodiversity, soil health, and plant resilience, showcasing a symbiotic integration of ecological principles and agricultural practices for sustainability. Strengths and Weaknesses  Highlight Strengths : Discuss agroecology's benefits, such as environmental sustainability, resilience to climate change, and support for local economies.  Address Weaknesses : Analyze potential challenges, including lower yields in some contexts, scalability issues, and the integration into existing agricultural policies.  Altieri & Toledo (2011) : This article can be used to underscore agroecology's strengths, particularly its impact on food sovereignty and empowering peasants in Latin America. Isaac et al. (2018): Contrast these strengths with the weaknesses or challenges mentioned in showcasing agroecology's varied effectiveness across different regions. Potential, Limits, and Risks  Assess Potential and Opportunities : Explore the transformative potential of agroecology for global food systems and environmental health.  Consider Limits and Risks : Critically evaluate the barriers to broader adoption of agroecological practices, such as policy resistance and the need for cultural shifts in farming and consumption patterns.  Gianinazzi et al. (2010) : Leverage this article to discuss the ecological underpinnings of agroecology, specifically the role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in enhancing agroecosystem services. This can illustrate agroecology's potential to create sustainable farming systems and its ecological limits and risks.  Wezel et al. (2009) to frame agroecology's global potential in transforming food systems towards sustainability and resilience, while also acknowledging the academic and practical challenges in universal application and acceptance, thus identifying potential limits in its widespread adoption.

5. Conclusion (Approx. 150-200 words)  Summarize Key Points : Briefly recap the main arguments made in your essay, emphasizing the critical insights gained from your analysis of agroecology.  Reflect on Implications : Discuss the broader implications of your findings for the future of sustainable agriculture and food systems.  Call to Action or Further Research : End with a call to action or suggest areas for further research, indicating the next steps in the agroecology movement or study.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

INSTRUCTIONS Points: 25 Grade: 25% of TOTAL COURSE GRADE Students will be asked to identify, describe, and critically analyze an alternative food (for more info on alternative foods, see the required readings from weeks 10 & 11). This analysis will be delivered in the form of an essay of about 1,200 words Description: The second assignment is a critical analysis of a chosen example of alternative food item, initiative, practice, movement, or campaign. Students are expected to identify, describe, and analyze a concrete alternative food initiatives of their choice. 1. Identify a relevant and actually existing example (be concrete and specific to sharpen your description of the case) 2. Illustrate your chosen example critically (for instance, explain why --or to what extent--it is an alternative food case using course material to support your claims); 3. Analyze the example by discussing, for instance, its goals, strategies, strengths & weaknesses, potential and limits and/or risks. Use course themes and ideas to elaborate on your points and demonstrate your ability to use academic references critically and independently. Your analysis must engage with a selection of adequate materials (e.g. academic articles, popular sources, grey literature). Specifically, you are expected to include ideas from at least: - One academic article from the syllabus – ( Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004 ) - Three additional academic articles from a discipline that is relevant to your discussion (these can be used anywhere in the piece) (“Isaac, M. E., Isakson, R. S., Dale, B., Levkoe, C., Hargreaves, S., Méndez, E. V., Wittman, H., Hammelman, C., Langill, J., Martin, A., Nelson, E., Ekers, M., Borden, K., Gagliardi, S., Buchanan, S., Archibald, S., & Gálvez Ciani, A. (2018). Agroecology in Canada: Towards an integration of agroecological practice, movement, and science. Sustainability, 10(9), 3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093299 ”, Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947 ”, and “Gianinazzi, S., Gollotte, A., Binet, M.-N., van Tuinen, D., Redecker, D., & Wipf, D. (2010). Agroecology: The key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in Ecosystem Services. Mycorrhiza, 20(8), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572- 010-0333-3 “) Guide for the assessment:  The selected case is relevant ( = it is an Alternative Food Initiative)  The selected case is sufficiently concrete ( = be specific).  The selected case is adequately described  The discussion is sharp, thoughtful, and well argued (e.g., external sources and/or personal observations are used to substantiate claims)

 The essay follows instructions regarding literature sources.  The essay develops all requests (= a good description + a good analysis) within the scope of a 1,200-word paper, references excluded. Length will be assessed with a degree of flexibility.  The essay is overall clear and adequately organized  Format requirements are respected. Format instructions:  Include your name and student number on top of page one  Provide a brief descriptive title  You may use first person pronouns.  Times new roman pt. 12 or (other equivalent font), 1-inch margins  Both single and double spacing is accepted  Include word count at the end the text  Provide a reference list at the end. References do not count towards the word limit.  Any citation style is accepted. Please be consistent with the one you chose .

Critical Analysis Essay guideline

Related Documents