Project 2 Peer feedback 301418120
doc
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Centennial College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
171
Subject
English
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
doc
Pages
8
Uploaded by ColonelRainTiger42
Project 2 Academic Honesty and Peer Review
Unit 10 (5%)
Academic honesty questionnaire: Part one
What advice would you give to a peer or friend who was tempted to use AI and/or other services/tools to write their assignment for them?
It is important to give a peer or friend sound advice if they express a desire to use artificial intelligence (AI) or other services/tools to write their assignment for them. Urge your friend to avoid using artificial intelligence (AI) in their assignments since it impedes their ability to learn and advance academically. Stress the value of asking teachers or peers for assistance and maintaining academic integrity. Effective time management is essential, and getting started early will help avoid desperate last-minute decisions. Remind them that making mistakes is a necessary part of learning and that making a sincere effort develops useful problem-solving abilities. Artificial Intelligence can complement understanding, but it cannot take its place. It is preferable to approach assignments by working with peers and asking instructors for advice. To achieve long-
term academic success, take the route of sincere effort.
Part two Go to your content folder -
College policies Centennial College’s Academic Honesty and Plagiarism policy. Summarize section 7 in 100 words. Focus on 3 points as there are many. 1. Penalties will increase progressively for repeated infractions of the academic integrity and plagiarism policy. This highlights how important maintaining academic integrity is and what happens if violations persist.
2. Academic dishonesty has several consequences listed by the college, such as written warnings, failing grades on tests or assignments, failing courses, being prohibited from reapplying, and suspension.
3. The College Hearings Committee (CHC) is advised to impose severe sanctions, such as expulsion or the revocation of academic credentials. Cases of serious academic dishonesty are overseen by the CHC, which has the authority to recommend expulsion or other drastic measures.
Part three
Post feedback to two of your classmates on the discussion board. Then copy and paste that feedback on this template and submit it in the assignment folder titled “Peer Review.” To be evaluated, your reviews must be in both the discussion board and this document. Your response must be a minimum of 350 words (one paragraph).
Reminders: Use Courteous, Specific, and Positive Language
Start with mentioning the strengths of the essay. Suggest 3-6 goal-oriented tasks for the writer. Ie.,) change your thesis to include frameworks you will be using. Include citations to your quotes. The following guidelines can help you become confident to get started on the peer review process:
Getting Started on the Peer Review Process
Guideline
Detail
Remember that everyone learns, both the writer and the reviewer
When you respond to other people's writing, you become a slightly better writer yourself, because you "read like a writer" and learn things
about your own work. When responding, be mindful that you are learning as much as the writer you're helping.
Be specific
Not, "Doesn't flow" (vague); but rather, "Could you improve cohesion by shifting paragraphs and adding transitions?"
Don't edit
Your job is to make suggestions, not to correct the work, or to focus merely on wording, grammar, punctuation, etc.
Refer to the product and not the writer
This is especially important when noting gaps or problems: Not, "
You
don't have any citations"; but rather, "
The
essay (paragraph/ page, etc.) doesn't yet have citations"; or
better still, "The essay needs citations."
Help your writer set At the revision stage, writers
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
positive, actionable goals for themselves
benefit from concrete, specific steps they can take to improve their work. As a reviewer, part of your task is helping your classmates develop these steps and goals.
Being generous and courteous is more than just "polite."
giving your undivided attention to the writing and the writer,
keeping an open mind, and
offering feedback that is genuine and useful.
Specific ,action oreinted points, full sentences
Thorough examples
Use a mix of approaches
For example
• Direct: "Add citations here"
• Interrogative: "How could you strengthen this point to match the quality of your explanation?"
• Perception: "I feel like more
context/summary of the source would help set up this textual evidence better."
Examples
When writing your peer review, you may consider the following questions:
What were the strengths of the essay?
What were some places in the essay where you had trouble following the writer's ideas, and why?
Is the essay well-organized in terms of overall structure (intro, middle, conclusion) and paragraph/topic order?
Are there unconventional features of the writing (sentence structure, grammar, layout, etc.) that you find disrupted your reading of the essay?
Was the essay a critique or evaluating the author's argument?
Did the writer use two frameworks correctly?
What are areas the writer should improve on.
Make sure to write directly to the writer (address them in second person as "you/ your" rather than third person).
Be collegial, supportive, and helpful! When pointing out flaws, focus on
action steps
rather than deficits.
Change a comment from "The grammar makes it hard to read" (negative language) to "Attention to grammar will improve readability" (positive language that conveys the same point).
Change "This paragraph is confusing" to "Try to make the
focus of this paragraph a little clearer."
Change "Your in-text citations are full of errors" to
"Your in-text citations would be correct if you added the author's name along with the year and page number."
Draft 1
Peer’s Name: Frohar Imamali
Your Feedback:
Your critique of Julie Bindel's essay "Why I Hate Vegetarians" provides a thorough analysis of the points made in the piece. Here are some compliments and ideas for enhancements. The main ideas of Bindel's essay are succinctly summarized in your response, which also offers a perceptive analysis of her arguments, pointing out both their advantages and disadvantages. You have shown a thorough comprehension of the
source material by skillfully integrating textual evidence from Bindel's essay to bolster your analysis. Furthermore, by including research sources in your critique, you deepen the conversation and provide a more comprehensive framework for assessing Bindel's claims.
The analysis would be strengthened, and the critiques would receive more thorough support if each of the three response segments included textual evidence from the main
source as well as the research source. To increase the critique's legitimacy and enhance the examination of important issues, for example, Bindel's arguments could be compared to empirical data on dietary trends or moral consumption patterns.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Incorporating a contemplative question or reflection towards the conclusion of the critique could stimulate additional thought and discourse regarding the essay's topics. All in all, your critique draft outline both recognizes the original essay's strengths and points out areas that could use improvement.
Draft 2
Peer’s Name: Gurjeet Singh
Your Feedback: Your critique effectively draws attention to how important it is to include
a variety of viewpoints, especially those of Indigenous people. By highlighting the need for a more nuanced comprehension of comedy's effects on various communities, you add to a more comprehensive conversation about the subject. Evaluation is supported by the way you contrast the claims made in the primary source with the results of other studies, and you emphasize the need for a more thorough investigation into the negative impacts of offensive humor. Additionally, you deepen your analysis and encourage readers to think about the ethical implications of comedic expression by emphasizing comedians' responsibility to be aware of the potential harm caused by their
jokes.
To grab readers' attention right away, think about adding a more attention-grabbing hook to the introduction. To improve the overall clarity and efficacy of your writing, I advise spending some time reading it carefully. Your criticism of the essay outline provides important new information about sustainability. I genuinely hope that the thorough comments and input you have received so far will be helpful in helping you improve the caliber and efficacy of your writing for the assignment.