Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (12th Edition)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134130422
Author: Jay Heizer, Barry Render, Chuck Munson
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter A, Problem 21P
Summary Introduction
To determine: The decision tree for the given situation.
Introduction: Decision-making is a process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Ronald Lau, chief engineer at South Dakota Electronics, has to decide whether to
build a new state-of-the-art processing facility. If the new facility works, the
company could realize a profit of $200,000. If it fails, South Dakota Electronics could
lose $180,000. At this time, Lau estimates a 60% chance that the new process will
fail.
The other option is to build a pilot plant and then decide whether to build a
complete facility. The pilot plant would cost $10,000 to build. Lau estimates a 50 -
50 chance that the pilot plant will work. If the pilot plant works, there is a 90%
probability that the complete plant, if it is built, will also work. If the pilot plant does
not work, there is only a 20% chance that the complete project (if it is constructed)
will work. Lau faces a dilemma. Should he build the plant? Should he build the pilot
project and then make a decision? Help Lau by analyzing this problem. Px
See picture for question details.
Emerson Electric is considering the purchase of equipment that will allow the company to manufacture a new line of wireless devices for home appliance control. The first cost will be $80,000 and the life estimated is 6 years with a salvage value of $10,000. Three different salespeople have provided estimates regarding the added revenue the equipment will generate. Salespersons 1,2, and 3 have made estimates of $10,000 , $16,000 , and $18,000 per year respectively if the Companys MARR is 8% per year find the PW of each salespersons estimates.
Chapter A Solutions
Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (12th Edition)
Ch. A - Prob. 1DQCh. A - Prob. 2DQCh. A - Prob. 3DQCh. A - Prob. 4DQCh. A - Prob. 5DQCh. A - Question: 6. Explain how decision trees might be...Ch. A - Prob. 7DQCh. A - Prob. 8DQCh. A - Question 9. Identify the five steps in analyzing a...Ch. A - Prob. 10DQ
Ch. A - Question 11. The expected value criterion is...Ch. A - Question 12. When are decision trees most useful?Ch. A - Given the following conditional value table,...Ch. A - Prob. 2PCh. A - Prob. 3PCh. A - Jeffrey Helm owns a health and fitness center...Ch. A - Prob. 5PCh. A - Prob. 6PCh. A - Prob. 7PCh. A - Prob. 8PCh. A - Prob. 9PCh. A - Prob. 10PCh. A - The University of Miami bookstore stocks textbooks...Ch. A - Palmer Jam Company is a small manufacturer of...Ch. A - Prob. 13PCh. A - Prob. 14PCh. A - Prob. 21PCh. A - Prob. 22PCh. A - Prob. 23PCh. A - Prob. 24PCh. A - Prob. 25PCh. A - Prob. 26PCh. A - Philip Musa can build either a large video rental...Ch. A - Prob. 28PCh. A - Prob. 29PCh. A - Question A.24 On the opening page of Module A and...Ch. A - Question Warehouse Tenting at the Port of Miami...Ch. A - Question Warehouse Tenting at the Port of Miami...Ch. A - Question Warehouse Tenting at the Port of Miami...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- The Energy Tech Company is considering making a bid for a fuel processing contract from the Uganda government. Energy Tech's CEO decided to bid $112 million. The management team estimates that it has a 60% chance of winning the contract with this bid amount. If the company wins the contract, it can choose one of three methods for processing the fuel. The company can develop a new method to process the fuel, use the existing process, though inefficient, or to subcontract the processing to a number of smaller companies once they get the fuel. The following tables present the results of these alternatives: DEVELOP NEW PROCESS Outcomes Probability Profit in ($1,000,000s) High success 0.30 $600 Moderate success 0.60 $300 Failure 0.10 ($100) USE CURRENT, BUT INEFFICIENT PROCESS: Outcomes Probability Profit ($1,000,000s) High success 0.50 $300 Moderate success 0.30 $200 Failure 0.20 ($40) SUBCONTRACT: Outcome…arrow_forwardBuild New plant option=arrow_forward1. A clothing store is opening a second location and wants to decide whether to open in San Francisco or New York. Opening a location in either city will involve different capital expenditures and demonstrate different rates of success. Below are the relevant data: DECISION PROBABILITY OF PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS FAILURE San Francisco 40% 60% New York 30% 70% PAYOFF (SUCCESS) 15,000,000 30,000,000 PAYOFF (FAILURE) 4,000,000 10,000,000 DECISION San Francisco New York The costs associated with opening each location are as follows: in San Francisco, the store will need to invest $2 million, while a New York location will require an investment of $5 million. The expected payoff amounts represent the potential revenue if the store succeeds, or the potential loss if the store fails. REQUIRED: a. Draw the decision tree for the above problem; b. Compute for the Expected Value for each decision; c. Compute for the net gain / loss of each decisionarrow_forward
- Picture attachedarrow_forwardBenjamin Moses, chief engineer of Offshore Chemicals, Inc., must decide whether to build a new processing facility based on an experimental technology. If the new facility works, the company will realize a net profit of $20 million. If the new facility fails, the company will lose $10 million. Benjamin’s best guess is that there is a 40 percent chance that the new facility will work. What decision should Benjamin Moses make?arrow_forwardYou have two design options for your new line of high-resolution monitors for Computer-Aided Design (CAD)workstations. The production run is for 110,000 units. Design option A has a .90 probability of yielding 65good monitors per 100 and a .10 probability of yielding 70good monitors per 100. This design will cost $1,000,000. Design option B has a .80 probability of yielding 65good units per 100 and a .20 probability of yielding 60good units per 100. This design will cost $1,350,000. Good or bad, each monitor will cost $75. Each good monitor will sell for $150. Bad monitors are destroyed and have no salvage value. We ignore any disposal costs in this problem. Demonstrate how decision trees can be used in order to choose the design option based on the above situation. Calculate the expected monetary value (EMV) of each option and determine which option you will propose.arrow_forward
- ABC company plans to produce a new line of laptop computers. Management wants to decide either to purchase keyboard for the new computers from an outside supplier or to manufacture them in the factory. If they buy from the supplier each keyboard will cost 100$. However, if they set up the assembly process required within the company it will cost an initial investment of $100,000. After the set up company can produce each keyboard in the factory for $75. Calculate the break-even point. Comment which option is better below and above the break-even point.arrow_forwardA new minor league baseball team is coming to town and the owners have decided to build a new stadium, either small or large. The success of the team with regard to ticket sales will be either high or low with probabilities of 0.75 and 0.25, respectively. If demand for tickets is high, the large stadium would provide a payoff of approximately $20 million. If ticket sales are low, the loss on the large stadium would be $5 million. If a small stadium is constructed, and ticket sales are low, the payoff is $500,000 after deducting the cost of construction. If ticket sales are high, the team can choose to build an upper deck, or to maintain the existing facility. Expanding the stadium in this scenario has a payoff of $10 million, whereas maintaining the same number of seats has a payoff of only $3 million. a. Draw a decision tree for this problem. b. What should management do to achieve the highest expected payoff?arrow_forwardA manager is trying to decide whether to build a small, medium, or large facility. Demand can be low, average, or high, with the estimated probabilities being 0.40, 0.35, and 0.25, respectively. A small facility is expected to earn an after-tax net present value of just $13,000 if demand is low. If demand is average, the small facility is expected to earn $15,000; it can be increased to medium size to earn a net present value of $30,000. If demand is high, the small facility is expected to earn $25,000 and can be expanded to medium size to earn $50,000 or to large size to earn $100,000. A medium-sized facility is expected to lose an estimated $50,000 if demand is low and earn $100,000 if demand is average. If demand is high, the medium-sized facility is expected to earn a net present value of $125,000; it can be expanded to a large size for a net payoff of $175,000. If a large facility is built and demand is high, earnings are expected to be $180,000. If demand is average for the large…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,