Anecdotally, entrepreneurs frequently encounter two critical dilemmas in managing human resources: the timing of hiring and the decision regarding hiring a generalist versus a specialist for their growing venture. Deciding when to expand a team is crucial, as premature hiring (i.e., hiring too soon) can strain resources, while delayed hiring (i.e., hiring too late) might hinder growth opportunities. Moreover, the choice between hiring a generalist or a specialist depends on the specific needs and stage of the venture, with each option presenting distinct advantages and challenges. To address these issues, a management scholar seeks to identify the factors shaping the hiring cycle throughout the entrepreneurial journey and to understand the criteria for choosing between generalists and specialists at various stages of a venture. The scholar has assembled a sample of 20 experienced South African entrepreneurs who have encountered both failure and success in the financial technology (FinTech) sector. Through in-depth interviews and analyses of relevant documents, including business plans and performance reports, the study will explore their hiring practices, the challenges they faced, and the human resources management strategies they used to build successful FinTech ventures. This study will provide valuable qualitative insights into how hiring decisions evolve and the impact of hiring generalists versus specialists on entrepreneurial success in the FinTech industry in South Africa. REQUIRED:5.1 Based on your understanding of research philosophy, critically discuss the ontological andepistemological implications of using qualitative methods in this study. As part of your discussion, highlighthow these philosophical assumptions influence the research process, and the interpretation of findingsrelated to hiring decisions and human resource management in FinTech ventures in South Africa.5.2 Reflecting on the personal experiences and unique contextual factors of the 20 South African FinTechentrepreneurs recruited for the study, how might their individual backgrounds and personal biases influencetheir perspectives on hiring practices? Discuss how these subjective factors could impact the depth andrichness of the study’s insights, and propose strategies the researcher might use to ensure that saturation iseffectively achieved, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of hiring practices in the SouthAfrican FinTech sector.
Anecdotally, entrepreneurs frequently encounter two critical dilemmas in managing human resources: the timing of hiring and the decision regarding hiring a generalist versus a specialist for their growing venture. Deciding when to expand a team is crucial, as premature hiring (i.e., hiring too soon) can strain resources, while delayed hiring (i.e., hiring too late) might hinder growth opportunities. Moreover, the choice between hiring a generalist or a specialist depends on the specific needs and stage of the venture, with each option presenting distinct advantages and challenges. To address these issues, a management scholar seeks to identify the factors shaping the hiring cycle throughout the entrepreneurial journey and to understand the criteria for choosing between generalists and specialists at various stages of a venture. The scholar has assembled a sample of 20 experienced South African entrepreneurs who have encountered both failure and success in the financial technology (FinTech) sector. Through in-depth interviews and analyses of relevant documents, including business plans and performance reports, the study will explore their hiring practices, the challenges they faced, and the human resources management strategies they used to build successful FinTech ventures. This study will provide valuable qualitative insights into how hiring decisions evolve and the impact of hiring generalists versus specialists on entrepreneurial success in the FinTech industry in South Africa.
REQUIRED:
5.1 Based on your understanding of research philosophy, critically discuss the ontological and
epistemological implications of using qualitative methods in this study. As part of your discussion, highlight
how these philosophical assumptions influence the research process, and the interpretation of findings
related to hiring decisions and human resource management in FinTech ventures in South Africa.
5.2 Reflecting on the personal experiences and unique contextual factors of the 20 South African FinTech
entrepreneurs recruited for the study, how might their individual backgrounds and personal biases influence
their perspectives on hiring practices? Discuss how these subjective factors could impact the depth and
richness of the study’s insights, and propose strategies the researcher might use to ensure that saturation is
effectively achieved, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of hiring practices in the South
African FinTech sector.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
