Concept explainers
Videos
List some factors influencing the biocompatibility of materials and explain how those factors are related to
Interpretation:
To list some factors influencing biocompatibility of materials and explain the interrelation of those factors to chemical bonding.
Concept introduction:
A bio-material can be defined as the non-living materials that are designed in specific way so that it can interact with the biological systems without causing much adverse effects. In such cases, it is of utmost importance that the used bio-material can elucidate appropriate responses in connection with the bio-material’s application in the body of an active organism. This is otherwise known as bio-compatibility. This bio-compatibility not only depends on the condition of host, but also on the properties of the material. In turn, the properties of the bio-material depend on the type of bonding that has taken place.
The factors that influence biocompatibility are size, shape, material composition, surface wettability, roughness and charge. For biocompatibility, the adverse reaction should be minimal at the interface between blood and the material or tissue. This means that the material interaction should be a nearly natural like the natural material in the surroundings of blood and tissue.
Answer to Problem 1CO
The following table illustrates the use of biomaterials.
Bio-Materials
| Metals | Polymers | Ceramics | Semiconductors |
| Used for making orthopedic screws and fixation; dental implants | Drug delivering devices, skin/cartilage
Ocular implants |
Bone replacements, heart valves and dental implants | Implantable microelectrodes and biosensors |
In general, a bio-material is chosen for an application depending upon the needed strength of the material, where it is used and the function it is expected to perform in the body. For example, the dental and bone replacements need structural strength, should not be brittle and should be able to withstand a lot of pressure. Accordingly, metals or ceramics are the biomaterial chosen for these tasks. Metals have metallic bond and ceramics are based on ionic bond, both of which are strong primary bonds. On the other hand, polymers are chosen for ocular implants and these polymers have covalent and secondary bonds which are weak bonds. If we observe to perform tougher jobs withstanding high stress like during grinding the food or incessant movement, metals or ceramics are chosen. For soft surfaces like skin and eye materials made of polymers are preferred.
Explanation of Solution
Th chosen material should have the properties that are needed for its proper performance in the body and at the same time biocompatible also. Considering biocompatibility, it is mainly surface phenomenon which interacts with the cells in the biological fluid.
In general, a biomaterial used can trigger foreign body reactions as these hydrophobic materials have high affinity to proteins. These protein biomaterial interactions help in the exposure of hidden protein structures. When exposed they become the receptor sites for inflammatory cells. This initiates the foreign body reactions. The surface properties of polymers influence the type and amount of bound proteins.
Thus, the primary bonding i.e. the strong bonds are covalent- formed due to sharing of electrons, ionic- formed due to the complete transfer of electrons and metallic bond where the metal cations are embedded in a ‘sea of electrons makes the material strong enough to withstand or resist induced stress without cracking or the shape being changed in anyway. In general, of the bonds in terms of strength is as follows:
Covalent bonds > ionic bonds > metallic bonds
In case of secondary bonding, there is no electron sharing − only electrical imbalance called dipole. They are the short-range attraction force that is the Van der Waals forces. This force is essential for the adhesion between molecules of liquids or molecular crystals. The other dipole − dipole interactive type hydrogen bonding forms hydrogen bridges between neighbouring molecules.
For example, the intraocular lens is basically made up of PMMA, silicones and acrylic. Poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) and acrylic are polymers whereas silicones are soft lining materials
Thus, the factors influencing biocompatibility and chemical bonding are closely related in terms of how the biomaterial is chosen and modified according to size, shape, material composition, surface wettability, roughness and charge.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 7 Solutions
Chemistry for Engineering Students
- On the next page is an LC separation of the parabens found in baby wash. Parabens are suspected in a link to breast cancer therefore an accurate way to quantitate them is desired. a. In the chromatogram, estimate k' for ethyl paraben. Clearly indicate what values you used for all the terms in your calculation. b. Is this a "good" value for a capacity factor? Explain. c. What is the resolution between n-Propyl paraben and n-Butyl paraben? Again, indicate clearly what values you used in your calculation. MAU | Methyl paraben 40 20 0 -2 Ethyl paraben n-Propyl paraben n-Butyl paraben App ID 22925 6 8 minarrow_forwardd. In Figure 4, each stationary phase shows some negative correlation between plate count and retention factor. In other words, as k' increases, N decreases. Explain this relationship between k' and N. Plate Count (N) 4000 3500 2500 2000 1500 1000 Figure 4. Column efficiency (N) vs retention factor (k') for 22 nonionizable solutes on FMS (red), PGC (black), and COZ (green). 3000 Eluent compositions (acetonitrile/water, A/W) were adjusted to obtain k' less than 15, which was achieved for most solutes as follows: FMS (30/70 A/W), PGC (60/40), COZ (80/20). Slightly different compositions were used for the most highly retained solutes. All columns were 50 mm × 4.6 mm id and packed with 5 um particles, except for COZ, which was packed with 3 um particles. All other chromatographic conditions were constant: column length 5 cm, column j.§. 4.6 mm, flow rate 2 mL/min, column temperature 40 °C, and injection volume 0.5 μL Log(k'x/K'ethylbenzene) FMS 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 ཐྭ ཋ ཤྩ བྷྲ ; 500 0 5 10…arrow_forwardf. Predict how the van Deemter curve in Figure 7 would change if the temperature were raised from 40 °C to 55 °C. Figure 7. van Desmter curves in reduced coordinates for four nitroalkane homologues (nitropropane, black; nitrobutane, red; nitropentane, blue; and nitrohexane, green) separated on the FMS phase. Chromatographic conditions: column dimensions 50 mm × 4.6 mm id, eluent 30/70 ACN/water, flow rates 0.2-5.0 mL/min, injection volume 0.5 and column temperature 40 °C. No corrections to the plate heights have been made to account for extracolumn dispersion. Reduced Plate Height (h) ° 20 40 60 Reduced Velocity (v) 8. (2) A water sample is analyzed for traces of benzene using headspace analysis. The sample and standard are spiked with a fixed amount of toluene as an internal standard. The following data are obtained: Ppb benzene Peak area benzene Peak area toluene 10.0 252 376 Sample 533 368 What is the concentration of benzene in the sample?arrow_forward
- Liquid chromatography has been used to track the concentration of remdesivir (a broad-spectrum antiviral drug, structure shown at right) in COVID patients undergoing experimental treatments. Intensity The authors provide the following details regarding standard solutions preparation: HN CN HO OH NH2 Remdesivir (RDV) stock solution (5000 µg/mL) was prepared by dissolving RDV drug powder using the mixture of DMSO: MeOH (30:70 v/v). The RDV working standard solutions for calibration and quality controls were prepared using methanol in concentrations of 100, 10, 1, 0.1, 0.01 µg/mL. 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500, 1000, and 5000 ng/mL sample solutions were prepared freshly by spiking calibration standard solutions into the blank human plasma samples for method calibration. a) What type of calibration method is being described? Why do you think the authors chose this method as opposed to another? b) Based on the details provided in part a, describe an appropriate method blank…arrow_forwardRecent advancements in liquid chromatography include the development of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and an increased use of capillary columns that had previously only been used with gas chromatography. Both of these advances have made the development of portable LC systems possible. For example, Axcend Corp. makes a portable system that uses a capillary column with an internal diameter of 150-μm-that is packed with 1.7-um stationary phase particles. In contrast, a traditional LC column has a 4.6 mm internal diameter and utilizes 5-um stationary phase particles. a) Explain one advantage that is afforded by the use of a capillary column in liquid chromatographic separation. Explain one disadvantage of capillary columns. b) Explain how the use of smaller stationary phase particles can improve the resolution of a separation. Include any relevant equations that support your explanation. c) A scientist at Rowan University is using the Axcend LC to conduct analyses of F…arrow_forwardThis paper describes the use of fullerene molecules, also known as buckyballs, as a stationary phase for liquid chromatography. The performance of the fullerene-modified stationary phase (FMS) is compared to that of a more common C18 stationary phase and to two other carbon-based stationary phases, PGC and COZ. A. 10A OM B. - Figure 1. Idealized drawing of the cross-section of a pore inside a silica particle, showing the relative densities of aminopropylsilyl (red/green) and fullerene (blue) groups: (A) full cross- section; (B) detailed view of covalent bonding of fullerene to the silica surface. Surface densities of silyl and fullerene groups were inferred from elemental composition results obtained at each stage of the synthesis (see Table 1). Absorbance (mAU, 220 nm) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 a. Define selectivity, a, with words and an equation. b. Explain how the choice of stationary phase affects selectivity. c. Calculate the resolution of the nitrobenzene and toluene peaks in…arrow_forward
- Normalized Intensity (a. u.) 0.5 1.0 A 3D-printed GC column (shown below) was created for use with "micro" gas chromatography applications. To prove its utility, it was used to separate a mixture of alkanes (C9-C18, C22, C24). For the separation shown below, the column temperature was ramped from 40 °C to 250 °C at a rate of 30 °C per minute. (a) 9 10 = 1 mm 12 13 15 22 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 Time (sec) a) What detector would you use for this analysis? Justify your selection. b) Explain how the chromatogram would change if the separation was run isothermally. c) Explain how the chromatogram would change if the temperature ramp were increased to 50 °C per minute.arrow_forwardDevise a synthesis of each compound from the indicated starting material. You may also use any organic compounds with one or two carbons and any needed inorganic reagents. a. Brarrow_forwardPlease help me with #2b & #3 using the data.arrow_forward
- Heparin is used as an anti-coagulant. A risk of heparin use is thrombocytopenia, or low platelet count. This risk is minimized with the use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), therefore it is desirable to separate LMWH from higher molecular weight heparins. The method of choice to do this is molecular exclusion chromatography. Below is a chromatogram from a molecular exclusion chromatographic run. Peaks ranging from A to J are clearly distinguishable. The heparin mixture that was analyzed had anywhere from 6 to 30 repeat units of monomer (where the heparin with 30 repeat units would be roughly five times the size of the heparin with six repeat units). a. Which letter most likely represents the peak with 6 repeat units given these heparin polymers were separated with molecular exclusion chromatography? b. Explain your reasoning describing the mechanism of retention in molecular exclusion chromatography. 100 80 60 60 Relative Abundance 40 40 E GH 20 20 B A 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 50…arrow_forwardHELP NOW PLEASE ! URGENT!arrow_forwardHELP NOW PLEASE ! URGENT!arrow_forward
Chemistry for Engineering StudentsChemistryISBN:9781337398909Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom HolmePublisher:Cengage Learning
World of Chemistry, 3rd editionChemistryISBN:9781133109655Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan L. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Brooks / Cole / Cengage Learning
General, Organic, and Biological ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781285853918Author:H. Stephen StokerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Introductory Chemistry: An Active Learning Approa...ChemistryISBN:9781305079250Author:Mark S. Cracolice, Ed PetersPublisher:Cengage Learning
Chemistry: Matter and ChangeChemistryISBN:9780078746376Author:Dinah Zike, Laurel Dingrando, Nicholas Hainen, Cheryl WistromPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co