Job application Program plan: In a file “JobApplicant.java”, create a class “JobApplicant”, Declare the necessary variables. Define the constructor, Assign the initial values for the job applicant. Define the method “get_Name()”, Return the name. Define the method “get_Phone()”, Return the phone number. Define the method “get_HasWordSkill()”, Return the Boolean value. Define the method “get_HasSpreadsheetSkill()”, Return the Boolean value. Define the method “get_HasDatabaseSkill()”, Return the Boolean value. Define the method “get_HasGraphicsSkill()”, Return the Boolean value. In a file “TestJobApplicants.java”, create a class “TestJobApplicants”, Define the method “main ()”, Call the constructor “JobApplicant()” that instantiates several job applicant objects. Assign the text messages. Execute for “true” statement for the first applicant. Call the method “display1()” with qualified message. Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message. Execute for “true” statement for the second applicant. Call the method “display1()” with qualified message. Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message. Execute for “true” statement for the third applicant. Call the method “display1()” with qualified message. Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message. Execute for “true” statement for the fourth applicant. Call the method “display1()” with qualified message. Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message. Define the method “is_Qualified()” that accepts each job applicant properties, Set the count to “0”. Declare Boolean variable. Declare the final variable. Execute for the Boolean value at “word”, Increment the count by “1”. Execute for the Boolean value at “sp”, Increment the count by “1”. Execute for the Boolean value at “db”, Increment the count by “1”. Execute for the Boolean value at “gr”, Increment the count by “1”. Check whether the count is greater than or equal to minimum number of skills, If it is true, set the Boolean value to “true”. Otherwise, set the Boolean value to “false”. Return the Boolean value. Define the method “display1()”, Print the output.

Question

This is a question that I have and would like someone who has experiences with scene graphs and entity component systems to answer.For context, I am currently implementing a game engine and currently I am debating on our current design.Our current design is we have a singular game component class that every component inherits from. Where we have components like SpriteRendererComponent, Mehs Component, etc. They inherit from this GameComponent class. The point of this is being able to have O(1) access to the scene to being able to modify components to attach more components with the idea of accessing those components to specific scene objects in a scene.Now, my question is what kinds of caveauts can this cause in terms of cache coherence? I am well aware that yes its O(1) and that is great but cache coherence is going to be really bad, but would like to know more explicit details and real-life examples such as write in RAM examples on how this is bad. A follow-up question that is part…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 5, Problem 7PE

Program Plan Intro

Job application

Program plan:

In a file “JobApplicant.java”, create a class “JobApplicant”,

Declare the necessary variables.

Define the constructor,

Assign the initial values for the job applicant.

Define the method “get_Name()”,

Return the name.

Define the method “get_Phone()”,

Return the phone number.

Define the method “get_HasWordSkill()”,

Return the Boolean value.

Define the method “get_HasSpreadsheetSkill()”,

Return the Boolean value.

Define the method “get_HasDatabaseSkill()”,

Return the Boolean value.

Define the method “get_HasGraphicsSkill()”,

Return the Boolean value.

In a file “TestJobApplicants.java”, create a class “TestJobApplicants”,

Define the method “main ()”,

Call the constructor “JobApplicant()” that instantiates several job applicant objects.

Assign the text messages.

Execute for “true” statement for the first applicant.

Call the method “display1()” with qualified message.

Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message.

Execute for “true” statement for the second applicant.

Call the method “display1()” with qualified message.

Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message.

Execute for “true” statement for the third applicant.

Call the method “display1()” with qualified message.

Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message.

Execute for “true” statement for the fourth applicant.

Call the method “display1()” with qualified message.

Otherwise, call the method “display1()” with non-qualified message.

Define the method “is_Qualified()” that accepts each job applicant properties,

Set the count to “0”.

Declare Boolean variable.

Declare the final variable.

Execute for the Boolean value at “word”,

Increment the count by “1”.

Execute for the Boolean value at “sp”,

Increment the count by “1”.

Execute for the Boolean value at “db”,

Increment the count by “1”.

Execute for the Boolean value at “gr”,

Increment the count by “1”.

Check whether the count is greater than or equal to minimum number of skills,

If it is true, set the Boolean value to “true”.

Otherwise, set the Boolean value to “false”.

Return the Boolean value.

Define the method “display1()”,

Print the output.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

This is a question that I have and would like someone who has experiences with scene graphs and entity component systems to answer.For context, I am currently implementing a game engine and currently I am debating on our current design.Our current design is we have a singular game component class that every component inherits from. Where we have components like SpriteRendererComponent, Mehs Component, etc. They inherit from this GameComponent class. The point of this is being able to have O(1) access to the scene to being able to modify components to attach more components with the idea of accessing those components to specific scene objects in a scene.Now, my question is what kinds of caveauts can this cause in terms of cache coherence? I am well aware that yes its O(1) and that is great but cache coherence is going to be really bad, but would like to know more explicit details and real-life examples such as write in RAM examples on how this is bad. A follow-up question that is part…

Q4: Consider the following MAILORDER relational schema describing the data for a mail order company. (Choose five only). PARTS(Pno, Pname, Qoh, Price, Olevel) CUSTOMERS(Cno, Cname, Street, Zip, Phone) EMPLOYEES(Eno, Ename, Zip, Hdate) ZIP CODES(Zip, City) ORDERS(Ono, Cno, Eno, Received, Shipped) ODETAILS(Ono, Pno, Qty) (10 Marks) I want a detailed explanation to understand the mechanism how it is Qoh stands for quantity on hand: the other attribute names are self-explanatory. Specify and execute the following queries using the RA interpreter on the MAILORDER database schema. a. Retrieve the names of parts that cost less than $20.00. b. Retrieve the names and cities of employees who have taken orders for parts costing more than $50.00. c. Retrieve the pairs of customer number values of customers who live in the same ZIP Code. d. Retrieve the names of customers who have ordered parts from employees living in Wichita. e. Retrieve the names of customers who have ordered parts costing less…

Q4: Consider the following MAILORDER relational schema describing the data for a mail order company. (Choose five only). (10 Marks) PARTS(Pno, Pname, Qoh, Price, Olevel) CUSTOMERS(Cno, Cname, Street, Zip, Phone) EMPLOYEES(Eno, Ename, Zip, Hdate) ZIP CODES(Zip, City) ORDERS(Ono, Cno, Eno, Received, Shipped) ODETAILS(Ono, Pno, Qty) Qoh stands for quantity on hand: the other attribute names are self-explanatory. Specify and execute the following queries using the RA interpreter on the MAILORDER database schema. a. Retrieve the names of parts that cost less than $20.00. b. Retrieve the names and cities of employees who have taken orders for parts costing more than $50.00. c. Retrieve the pairs of customer number values of customers who live in the same ZIP Code. d. Retrieve the names of customers who have ordered parts from employees living in Wichita. e. Retrieve the names of customers who have ordered parts costing less than$20.00. f. Retrieve the names of customers who have not placed…