The relationship of genotype to phenotype , difference between genotype and phenotype, and why phenotype is not determined only by genotype. Introduction: DNA is a genetic material consisting of a long stretch of nucleotide sequences with 2 m length. Chromosomes carry genetic or hereditary information from parents to the offspring. Homologous chromosomes carry two forms of a gene in the same locus; these are known as alleles. A complete set of genetic material (both coding and non-coding regions of DNA) of an organism is called as a genome. The total human genome consists of about 3.1 billion base pairs and nearly 20,000 protein-coding genes.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4.4, Problem 5AYLO

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

The relationship of genotype to phenotype, difference between genotype and phenotype, and why phenotype is not determined only by genotype.

Introduction:

DNA is a genetic material consisting of a long stretch of nucleotide sequences with 2 m length. Chromosomes carry genetic or hereditary information from parents to the offspring. Homologous chromosomes carry two forms of a gene in the same locus; these are known as alleles. A complete set of genetic material (both coding and non-coding regions of DNA) of an organism is called as a genome. The total human genome consists of about 3.1 billion base pairs and nearly 20,000 protein-coding genes.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

What thoughts after reading this: "The cases of Henrietta Lacks and the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment call attention to ethical violations in medical research, particularly involving underrepresented groups. Both instances raise important issues around informed consent, exploitation, and the responsibility of researchers. Biomedical ethics is grounded in principles like autonomy, beneficence, and justice. In both the Lacks case and the Tuskegee study, these principles were ignored. Henrietta Lacks’ cells were taken without her consent, and the men in the Tuskegee study were denied treatment without their knowledge. These failures in ethical oversight have caused lasting harm to the trust marginalized communities have in the medical system. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are designed to ensure ethical standards in research by requiring informed consent and protecting participants from harm. However, in Lacks’ case and the Tuskegee study, no such protections were in place. These…

What are your thoughts on this subject: "The story of Henrietta Lacks highlights critical issues in biomedical ethics, researcher responsibility, and the exploitation of marginalized communities. Henrietta, an African American woman, had her cells taken without consent in 1951 during her treatment for cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital. These cells, known as HeLa cells, became pivotal in medical research, contributing to the development of vaccines and cancer treatments. However, Henrietta and her family were never informed or compensated for the use of her cells. This violation of informed consent, a core principle of biomedical ethics, mirrors broader patterns of exploitation seen in historical medical studies, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where African American men were used in experiments without their consent or proper treatment. These unethical practices were often justified by racist and paternalistic attitudes, perpetuating a deep mistrust in medical…

Henrietta Lacks's cells have easily been the most important human cell line used in research in the last 70 years. HeLa cells have been sold by pharmaceutical and laboratory technology companies, creating millions or billions of dollars of revenue and have contributed to a huge host of medical advances including several vaccines. Their use has changed the course of medicine for the good. However, there was no informed consent from Henrietta or her family at the time the cells were taken. In fact, Dr. Gey, who took the original cell sample from Henrietta even initially lied and said they came from a woman named "Helen Lane." So clearly he knew that there was something unethical about his actions. Henrietta Lacks died from the aggressive cervical cancer that the cells were harvested from. She never knew how important her cells would become. Shockingly, her family was never informed about her contributions to science and medicine until the 1973, more than 20 years after the sample was…