Let X be a negative binomial random variable with parameters n and p, and let Y be a binomial random variable with parameters n and p. Show that P { X > n } = P { Y < r } Hint: Either one could attempt an analytical proof of the preceding equation, which is equivalent to proving the identity ∑ i = n + 1 ∞ ( i − 1 r − 1 ) p r ( 1 − p ) i − r = ∑ i = 0 r − 1 ( n i ) × p i ( 1 − p ) n − i or one could attempt a proof that uses the probabilistic interpretation of these random variables. That is, in the latter case, start by considering a sequence of independent trials having a common probability p of success. Then try to express the events { X > n } and { Y < r } in terms of the outcomes of this sequence.
Let X be a negative binomial random variable with parameters n and p, and let Y be a binomial random variable with parameters n and p. Show that P { X > n } = P { Y < r } Hint: Either one could attempt an analytical proof of the preceding equation, which is equivalent to proving the identity ∑ i = n + 1 ∞ ( i − 1 r − 1 ) p r ( 1 − p ) i − r = ∑ i = 0 r − 1 ( n i ) × p i ( 1 − p ) n − i or one could attempt a proof that uses the probabilistic interpretation of these random variables. That is, in the latter case, start by considering a sequence of independent trials having a common probability p of success. Then try to express the events { X > n } and { Y < r } in terms of the outcomes of this sequence.
Solution Summary: The author explains that for a negative binomial random variable with parameters PX>n=PY, more than n variables should be required.
Let X be a negative binomial random variable with parameters n and p, and let Y be a binomial random variable with parameters n and p. Show that
P
{
X
>
n
}
=
P
{
Y
<
r
}
Hint: Either one could attempt an analytical proof of the preceding equation, which is equivalent to proving the identity
∑
i
=
n
+
1
∞
(
i
−
1
r
−
1
)
p
r
(
1
−
p
)
i
−
r
=
∑
i
=
0
r
−
1
(
n
i
)
×
p
i
(
1
−
p
)
n
−
i
or one could attempt a proof that uses the probabilistic interpretation of these random variables. That is, in the latter case, start by considering a sequence of independent trials having a common probability p of success. Then try to express the events
{
X
>
n
}
and
{
Y
<
r
}
in terms of the outcomes of this sequence.
At the beginning of each semester, students at the University of Minnesota receive one prepaid copy card
that allows them to print from the copiers and printers on campus. The amount of money remaining on the
card can be modeled by a linear equation where A represents how much remains on the card (in dollars)
and p represents the number of pages that the student has printed. The graph of this linear equation is
given below.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
A = Amount on Card ($)
0
200
400
600
800 1000 1200 1400 1600
p = Number of Pages Printed
What information does the vertical intercept tell you (represent) for this problem? Be sure to include
specific details in your answer -- your answer should have both quantitative and qualitative data to
describe the answer in terms of the question.
Data management no 2 thanks
G12 Data Management please help on the first question no 1 below
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, probability and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Continuous Probability Distributions - Basic Introduction; Author: The Organic Chemistry Tutor;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxqxdQ_g2uw;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Probability Density Function (p.d.f.) Finding k (Part 1) | ExamSolutions; Author: ExamSolutions;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsuS2ehsTDM;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Find the value of k so that the Function is a Probability Density Function; Author: The Math Sorcerer;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqoCZWrVnbA;License: Standard Youtube License