
Concept explainers
a)
To determine: The suitable outsourcing provider using factor- rating method.
Introduction:
Factor-rating method:
The factor-rating method is a quantitative approach to make a decision from various alternatives such that the decision is beneficial to the firm involved. This method is utilized to decide on new layout, new locations, best supplier, outsourcing providers etc.
a)

Answer to Problem 8P
The suitable outsourcing provider is Canada.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Selection criterion | Weight | England | Canada |
Price of service from outsourcer | 0.1 | 2 | 3 |
Nearness of facilities to client | 0.6 | 3 | 1 |
Level of technology | 0.2 | 1 | 3 |
History of successful outsourcing | 0.1 | 1 | 2 |
Low Risk = 1
High Risk = 3
Formula to calculate weighted risk:
Formula to calculate Total weighted risk:
Excel Formula:
Calculation of weighted risk for England:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Service from outsourcer:
The weighted risk for price of service from outsourcer is 0.2.
Nearness of facilities to client:
The weighted risk for Nearness of facilities to client is 1.8.
Level of Technology:
The weighted risk for Level of Technology is 0.2.
History of successful outsourcing:
The weighted risk for History of successful outsourcing is 0.1.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for England is 2.3.
Calculation of weighted risk for Canada:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Price of service from outsourcer:
The weighted risk for price of service from outsourcer is 0.3.
Nearness of facilities to client:
The weighted risk for nearness of facilities to client is 0.6.
Level of Technology:
The weighted risk for Level of Technology is 0.6.
History of successful outsourcing:
The weighted risk for History of successful outsourcing is 0.2.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Canada is 1.7.
The weighted risk value for England is 2.3. The weighted risk value for Canada is 1.7. Since, the risk value for Canada is less for England (1.7 < 2.3), Canada is selected.
The suitable outsourcing provider is Canada.
b)
To determine: The impact of doubling the weights used in part (a).
Introduction:
Factor-rating method:
The factor-rating method is a quantitative approach to make a decision from various alternatives such that the decision is beneficial to the firm involved. This method is utilized to decide on new layout, new locations, best supplier, outsourcing providers etc.
b)

Answer to Problem 8P
The Doubling of weights will have No Change.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Selection criterion | Weight | England | Canada |
Price of service from outsourcer | 0.2 | 2 | 3 |
Nearness of facilities to client | 1.2 | 3 | 1 |
Level of technology | 0.4 | 1 | 3 |
History of successful outsourcing | 0.2 | 1 | 2 |
Low Risk = 1
High Risk = 3
Formula to calculate weighted risk:
Formula to calculate Total weighted risk:
Excel Formula:
Calculation of weighted risk for England:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Price of service from outsourcer:
The weighted risk for price of service from outsourcer is 0.4.
Nearness of facilities to client:
The weighted risk for nearness of facilities to client is 3.6.
Level of Technology:
The weighted risk for Level of Technology is 0.4.
History of successful outsourcing:
The weighted risk for History of successful outsourcing is 0.2.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for England is 4.6.
Calculation of weighted risk for Canada:
The weighted risk is calculated my multiplying the weights with risk rating of each criteria.
The weighted risk is calculated as follows:
Price of service from outsourcer:
The weighted risk for price of service from outsourcer is 0.6.
Nearness of facilities to client:
The weighted risk for nearness of facilities to client is 1.2.
Level of Technology:
The weighted risk for Level of Technology is 1.2.
History of successful outsourcing:
The weighted risk for History of successful outsourcing is 0.4.
Calculation of Total weighted risk:
The total weighted risk is calculated be summing all the weighted risk values.
The total weighted risk for Canada is 3.4.
The weighted risk value for England is 4.6. The weighted risk value for Canada is 3.4. Since, the risk value for Canada is less for England (3.4 < 4.6), Canada is selected.
The doubling of weights of the risk avoidance criteria does not alter the result arrived at in part (a). The weighted risk value is doubled for England and Canada. But, the risk value of Canada is still lower than England. The result will not change irrespective of doubling the weights because the risk avoidance criterion value is unaltered.
Hence, the Doubling of weights will have No Change.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Principles Of Operations Management
- Hyundai Motors is considering three sites-A, B, and C-at which to locate a factory to build its new electric car batteries. The goal is to locate at a minimum-cost site, where cost is measured by the annual fixed plus variable costs of production. Hyundai Motors has gathered the following data: Site Annualized Fixed Cost Variable Cost per Battery Produced A $11,000,000 $2,600 B C $2,000 $1,100 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 The firm knows it will produce between 0 and 60,000 batteries at the new plant each year, but, thus far, that is the extent of its knowledge about production plans. a) The value of volume, V, of production above which site C is recommended = batteries (round your response up to the next whole number).arrow_forwardHyundai Motors is considering three sites-A, B, and C-at which to locate a factory to build its new electric car batteries. The goal is to locate at a minimum-cost site, where cost is measured by the annual fixed plus variable costs of production. Hyundai Motors has gathered the following data: Site Annualized Fixed Cost Variable Cost per Battery Produced A $11,000,000 $2,500 B C $2,100 $1,050 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 The firm knows it will produce between 0 and 60,000 batteries at the new plant each year, but, thus far, that is the extent of its knowledge about production plans. a) The value of volume, V, of production above which site C is recommended = batteries (round your response up to the next whole number).arrow_forwardThe importance of keeping track of invoices and budgeting in a nursing home kitchen and how can a nutritionist utilize this in their career? Please not just a short explanation.arrow_forward
- The importance of interviewing potential food service aides and how can a nutritionist utilize this in their career? Please not just a short explanation.arrow_forwardWhat role does job analysis and job evaluation play in the compensation decision? Give an example of an organization NO AIarrow_forwardI did the first half correct! Please help me with the second half, not quite sure of the naive approach. Thanks in advance!arrow_forward
- Because my tutor and I didnt get it rightarrow_forwardOperations Managementarrow_forwardHow does wellness reflect and impact the past and the future of our health as a workout routine? What are the obstacles during the workout routine, and how do you overcome the obstacles? What are the best solutions to plan and accomplish the wellness?arrow_forward
- My last question! Thank you all for helping me better understand how OM works. If you can assist me for this one I'd be very thankful. Can you explain it step by step?I know now that LS is late start, and ES is early start. - •Activities on the critical path are? •The total project completion time for Rafay Ishfaq's software firm is how many weeks?•Determine the slack time for each of the activities for A-F •What is the total slack for the non critical paths in Rafays project?arrow_forwardThank you so much! I was able to answer C without help! Can you assist me with slack time for A-F? I believe A=0arrow_forwardThere's 8 parts, but I need some help with them. I always get confused on which is most critical of a patharrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningContemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing


