
Concept explainers
Case summary:
NSU hospital in US runs 14 hospitals. It applied Six Sigma to reduce time in bed allotments and turnaround time. Initial analysis showed that there were not enough beds, however a deeper analysis revealed that staff was wrongly using the bed tracking system (BTS) which led to delays in assignment and subsequent delays in operations and emergency services. The bed turnaround project was targeted at the surgical nursing unit.
In the “define” stage of the DMAIC process, a mapping of the admission-discharge process was completed. In the “measure” stage it was found that target turnaround time must be between 120 minutes and 150 minutes. The research team also found a DPMO of 672,725 which translates to 1 sigma and average turnaround time of 226 minutes. Next they identified all the variables affecting turnaround time using a cause and effect diagram.
In the “analyse” stage specific variables were prioritized and analysed. Results showed that technical and communication failure were the two main roadblocks causing severe delays. It was found that staff was not adequately trained and severe lack of communication between the admission department and other teams. A host of other problems were also found and rectified.
In the “improve” stage turnaround time was reduced to 90 minutes from 226 minutes. In the “control” stage SPC charts were used and turnaround time further improved to 69 minutes. The results were subsequently applied to all units of the hospital and led to higher customer satisfaction.
To determine: Identify a process in a hospital, restaurant, school, or other service that might be improved by the Six Sigma DMAIC process, and discuss how to apply it, including the specific DMAIC stages

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 2 Solutions
Operations and Supply Chain Management 9th edition
- Negotiators can gain several benefits from using the strategy of multiple equivalent simultaneous offers. By offering multiple options it reduces the chance of rejection. It also improves the chances of reaching reaching an agreement. By presenting multiple offers, it shows you are flexible. disagree with this post or add on to the postarrow_forwardThe strategy of Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers involves presenting several equally valuable options to the other party during negotiations. This approach benefits negotiators by creating flexibility and increasing the chances of finding a mutually agreeable solution. By offering multiple options, negotiators show that they are open to compromise, which can build trust and make the negotiation process smoother. It also helps avoid getting stuck on one issue, as the other party can choose from several alternatives that meet their needs. In my experience, using MESOs in a work negotiation helped both parties reach an agreement more quickly because each option was carefully thought out to address different needs, and this made it easier for us to settle on one that worked for both sides. This strategy can also reveal what is most important to the other party, helping negotiators understand their priorities better. agree or disagree with the postarrow_forwardExamine the conflicts between improving customer service levels and controlling costs in sales. Strategies to Balance Both customer service levels and controlling costs in sales 1.Outsourcing and workforce optimization 2. AI-driven customer supportarrow_forward
- how can you gain trust in a negotiation setting?arrow_forward✓ Custom $€ .0 .on File Home Insert Share Page Layout Formulas Data Review View Help Draw Arial 10 B B14 ✓ X✓ fx 1400 > 甘く 曲 > 冠 > Comments Editing ✓ . . . P Q R S T 3 A Production cost ($/unit) B с D E F G H J K L M N $74.00 4 Inventory holding cost ($/unit) $1.50 5 Lost sales cost ($/unit) $82.00 6 Overtime cost ($/unit) $6.80 7 Undertime cost ($/unit) $3.20 8 Rate change cost ($/unit) $5.00 9 Normal production rate (units) 2,000 10 Ending inventory (previous Dec.) 800 11 Cumulative 12 13 Month Demand Cumulative Demand Product Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Cumulative Cumulative Product Sales 14 January 1,400 1,475 15 FUERANZ222222223323333BRUINE 14 February 1,000 2,275 Month January February Demand Demand Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Sales 1,400 #N/A 1,475 #N/A #N/A #N/A 1,000 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 16 March 1,800 2,275 March 1,800 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 17 April 2,700 2,275 April 2,700 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 18 May 3,000 2,275 May 3,000 #N/A…arrow_forwardFollow guidelines and summarize in a paragrapharrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing
- Management, Loose-Leaf VersionManagementISBN:9781305969308Author:Richard L. DaftPublisher:South-Western College PubFoundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage LearningFoundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...MarketingISBN:9781285193946Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning



