Company HA is an aftermarket producer and distributor of automotive replacement parts. The company expanded its business to become a supplier of auto air-conditioning units. The president of sales says the problems are prevalent in the assembly department. While the treasurer states that the problem is the investment in wrong inventories. The assembly manager has stated that the problem is due to a lack of space to assemble the inventory. The purchasing manager stated that purchasing is not the reason for the problems. To explain: The role of MRP in the plan.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 2CS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company HA is an aftermarket producer and distributor of automotive replacement parts. The company expanded its business to become a supplier of auto air-conditioning units. The president of sales says the problems are prevalent in the assembly department. While the treasurer states that the problem is the investment in wrong inventories. The assembly manager has stated that the problem is due to a lack of space to assemble the inventory. The purchasing manager stated that purchasing is not the reason for the problems.

To explain: The role of MRP in the plan.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Summarize chapters 1 through 8 of the book "food and beverage cost control"

Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this thoroughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that the LA warehouse becomes temporarily or even indefinitely disabled since facing a large-scale labor disruption. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis: Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary The Constraint Scenario exhibits a higher total cost of $7,424,575.45 compared to the What-if Scenario's total cost of $6,611,905.60, signifying a difference of approximately $812,669.85, which indicates a more expensive operation in the Constraint Scenario. The average service time is slightly higher in the Constraint Scenario (0.72 days vs. 0.70 days), suggesting that the What-if Scenario provides a marginally quicker service. Moreover, the average end-to-end service time…

Can you guys help me with this? Thank you! Here's the question: Compared to the CONSTRAINT model, how has the network changed? How do you plan to add contingency to your network? Please answer this throughly Here's the what-if scenario: Assume that Dallas plant has lost power. It cannot serve the DCs anymore and has to remain locked indefinitely. Re-optimize the network considering this new constraint. Here's the scenario comparison analysis: Scenario Constraint Scenario vs What-if Scenario Summary In comparing the Constraint Scenario to the What-if Scenario, a few key differences highlight the efficiencies evident in the supply chain. Firstly, the total cost in the Constraint Scenario is lower at $7,424,575.45, while the What-if Scenario incurs a total cost of $7,486,369.12, resulting in a cost delta of $61,793.67. Additionally, although both scenarios exhibit the same average service time of 0.72 days, the What-if Scenario has a more favorable average end-to-end service time of 2.41…