Whether it is preferable to consider the observations with x values 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 0.95 and 0.98 than observations in example 13.3

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13.2, Problem 14E

To determine

Whether it is preferable to consider the observations with x values 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 0.95 and 0.98 than observations in example 13.3

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The rental of an apartment (?R) near campus is a function of the square footage (??Sq). A random sample of apartments near campus yielded the following summary statistics: ?¯R¯ = $340, ??¯Sq¯ = 93, ??sR = $ 29.1, and ???sSq= 10.5. Suppose also that the correlation between price and weight is ?r = 0.83. (a) Write the implied least squares linear regression equation. (b) Suppose an apartment has 75 sqft. Predict its price based on the above model. (c) Suppose the true rental of the apartment in part (b) is $ 345. What is the value of the residual?

Suppose the following data were collected from a sample of 15 houses relating selling price to square footage and the architectural style of the house. Use statistical software to find the following regression equation: PRICEi=b0+b1SQFTi+b2COLONIALi+b3RANCHi+ei . Is there enough evidence to support the claim that on average, houses that are ranch style have lower selling prices than houses that are Victorian style at the 0.05 level of significance? If yes, write the regression equation in the spaces provided with answers rounded to two decimal places. Else, select "There is not enough evidence."Selling Price Square Footage Colonial (1 if house is Colonial style, 0 otherwise) Ranch (1 if house is Ranch style, 0 otherwise) Victorian (1 if house is Victorian style, 0 otherwise) 377640 1941 1 0 0 460996 3397 0 1 0 405781 2764 0 0 1 407216 2906 0 0 1 435139 3401 1 0 0 405275 2600 0 0 1 381141 2203 0 1 0 370490 2046 1 0 0 404070 2210 0 0 1 460196 3692 0 1 0 382780 2172 1 0 0 406466 2606 0 1…

The following is the result of the multiple linear regression analysis in STATISTICA, where the response Y = lung capacity of a person, xage = age of the person in years, xheight = height of the person in inches, = a categorical variable with 2 levels (0 = non- X smoke smoker, 1 = smoker), and xCaesarean = a categorical variable with 2 levels (0 = normal delivery, 1 = %3D %3D Caesarean-section delivery). b* Std.Err. Std.Err. t(720) p-value N=725 Intercept Age Height Smoke Caesarean of b 0.467772 0.017626 of b* -11.8001 0.1372 0.2790 -0.6407 -25.2263 7.7846 28.6552 -5.0142 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.206427 0.026517 0.026340 0.754765 -0.074205 -0.033054 0.009735 0. 127774 0.092146 0.000001 0.022851 0.014799 0.014492 -0.2102 -2.2808 What is the predicted lung capacity of an 14-year old non-smoker whose height is 71 inches born by normal delivery? (final answer to 4 decimal places)