Principles of Economics 2e
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9781947172364
Author: Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher: OpenStax
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Textbook Question
Chapter 12, Problem 43P
A city currently emits 15 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. Table 12.13 shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.
- Using the information in Table 12.13 calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this City.
- What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
A city currently emits 16 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. The table below shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.
Emissions
Total Cost
Marginal Cost
Total Benefit
Marginal Benefit
16 MG
Current
N/A
Current
N/A
12 MG
50
800
8 MG
150
1300
4 MG
500
1650
0 MG
1200
1950
Complete the table.
What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
A city currently emits 16 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. Table 12.13 shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.
TC
TB
16 MG
Current
Current
12 MG
50
800
8 MG
150
1300
4 MG
500
1850
0 MG
1200
2000
Table 12.13
Using the information in Table 12.13 calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city.
What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
Firm A currently dumps 223 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 192 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives each firm 10 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $173 for Firm A and $76 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the firms are allowed to trade permits between each other?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Principles of Economics 2e
Ch. 12 - Identify the following situations as an example of...Ch. 12 - Identify whether the market supply curve will...Ch. 12 - For each of your answers to Exercise 12.2, will...Ch. 12 - Table 12.5 provides the supply and demand...Ch. 12 - Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of...Ch. 12 - Classify the following pollution-control policies...Ch. 12 - An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a...Ch. 12 - Four films called Elm, Maple, Oak, and (Shelly,...Ch. 12 - The rows in Table 12.7 show three market-oriented...Ch. 12 - Suppose a city releases 16 million gallons of raw...
Ch. 12 - The state of Colorado requires oil and gas...Ch. 12 - Consider the case of global environmental problems...Ch. 12 - A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered...Ch. 12 - What is an externality?Ch. 12 - Give an example of a positive externality and an...Ch. 12 - What is the difference between private costs and...Ch. 12 - In a market without environmental regulations,...Ch. 12 - What is command-and-control environmental...Ch. 12 - What are the three problems that economists have...Ch. 12 - What is a pollution charge and what incentive does...Ch. 12 - What is a marketable permit and what incentive...Ch. 12 - What are better-defined property rights and what...Ch. 12 - As the extent of environmental protection expands,...Ch. 12 - As the extent of environmental protection expands,...Ch. 12 - What are the economic tradeoffs between low-income...Ch. 12 - What arguments d0 low-income countries make in...Ch. 12 - In the tradeoff between economic output and...Ch. 12 - What does a point inside the production...Ch. 12 - Suppose you want to put a dollar value on the...Ch. 12 - Would environmentalists favor command-and-control...Ch. 12 - Consider two ways of protecting elephants from...Ch. 12 - Will a system of marketable permits work with...Ch. 12 - Is zero pollution possible under a marketable...Ch. 12 - Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Way or why not?Ch. 12 - From an economic perspective, is it sound policy...Ch. 12 - Recycling is a relatively inexpensive solution to...Ch. 12 - Can extreme levels of pollution hurt the economic...Ch. 12 - How can high-income countries benefit from...Ch. 12 - Technological innovations shift the production...Ch. 12 - Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium,...Ch. 12 - Refer to Table 12.2. The externality created by...Ch. 12 - Table 12.12, shows the supply and demand...Ch. 12 - A city currently emits 15 million gallons (MG) of...Ch. 12 - In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of...
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Find more solutions based on key concepts
E2-13 Identifying increases and decreases in accounts and normal balances
Learning Objective 2
Insert the mis...
Horngren's Accounting (11th Edition)
Define cost pool, cost tracing, cost allocation, and cost-allocation base.
Cost Accounting (15th Edition)
Prepare the journal entry to reconcile the bank statement in EA9.
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
When calculating a ratio with numbers from the balance sheet and income statement, why must you use the balance...
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
How are diversity and innovation related?
Principles of Management
Myrna White is a mobile housekeeper. The price for a standard house cleaning is $150 and takes 5 hours. Each wo...
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose the total benefit and total cost to society of various levels of pollution abatement are as follows: Complete column (4). (Enter your responses as integers.) (1) Pollution Abatement (2) Total Benefit (3) Total Cost (4) Total Net Benefit (5) Marginal Benefit (6) Marginal Cost 0 0 0 nothing — — 1 22 9 nothing 2 42 20 nothing 3 60 33 nothing 4 76 48 nothing 5 90 65 nothing 6 102 84 nothing (1) Pollution Abatement (2) Total Benefit (3) Total Cost (4) Total Net Benefit (5) Marginal Benefit (6) Marginal Cost 0 0 0 — — 1 22 9 13 2 42 20 22 3 60 33 27 4 76 48 28 5 90 65 25 6 102 84 18 Using optimization in levels, if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to…arrow_forwardFirm A currently dumps 243 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 126 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 61 pollution permits and gives Firm B 65 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $113 for Firm A and $165 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the government does NOT allow the firm to trade the permits between each other?arrow_forwardThe figure to the right shows the marginal cost of pollution abatement for two firms, A and B. The firms were initially abating 46 units of pollution each. Now they can trade pollution permits at a price of $22. As a result, firm A sells permits and firm B buys permits. Both firms are now better off and their total saving will be $ (Enter your answer rounded to the nearest whole number.) Dollars per Unit ($) 34 22 10 The Efficiency of Tradable Pollution Permits MCB 31 46 61 Quantity of Pollution Abatement MCA Narrow_forward
- Suppose there is a factory located on a river and downstream of the factory is a business that rents kayaks and a different business that rents innertubes used to float down the river. If allowed to pollute the river, the factory's profits are $2,000. The most cost effective way for the factory to eliminate this pollution is by reducing the amount of dangerous materials used in their production process. This change in the production process would reduce the factory's profits from $2,000 to $1,000. The profits of the kayak rental business are $800 if the river is not polluted and $500 if the river is polluted and the business remains downstream of the factory. However, the kayak rental business can obtain profits of $600 if they move their kayak rental business upstream of the factory. The profits of the innertube rental business are $1100 if the river is not polluted and $500 if the river is polluted and the business remains downstream of the factory. However, the innertube rental…arrow_forwardNo hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph. As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant. What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.arrow_forwardFirm A currently dumps 247 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 246 tons of chemicals into the local river. The government has decided to reduce the pollution and from now on will require a pollution permit for each ton of pollution dumped into the river. The government gives Firm A 32 pollution permits and gives Firm B 48 pollution permits. The abatement costs of one ton of pollution is $153 for Firm A and $89 for Firm B. What would be the total cost of reducing pollution, if the firms are .allowed to trade permits between each other?arrow_forward
- What are the costs of pollution according to the Lancet Commission on pollution and health? Why are those numbers likely to be an underestimate? Explain.arrow_forwardPRICE OF CARS 1. Efficiency in the presence of externalities Cars impose many external costs on society: carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to air pollution, congestion on roadways, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of cars is not equal to the socially efficient quantity. The following graph shows the demand for cars (their marginal private benefit), the supply of cars (the marginal private cost of producing them), and the marginal social cost of cars, including both the marginal private cost and external costs. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially efficient quantity. Demand (MPB, MSB) QUANTITY OF CARS As a result, the market output is MSC + Market Output Socially Efficient Output Supply (MPC) the socially efficient output. (?) Which of the following policies could help the government achieve the socially efficient outcome? Check all that apply. ☐…arrow_forward8.1 Suppose we have an agricultural valley 100 km by 50 km, with a polluting electricity power plant. The power plant causes pollution problems in a narrow strip of land downwind of the plant, and within this valley. 10 km in length and 500 m in width, but no problems outside of that area. The total effect of the pollution is to make crop land less productive. If we were to clean up the pollution, would we expect land prices to increase? Where? Would we expect wages to decline? Would the changes in land prices and/or wages fully reflect the benefits of cleaning up the pollution? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- It’s common to think that reducing pollution is necessarily costly because to reduce pollution we need to tax firms who will then produce less. But can you think of one example in which pollution might not only be unpleasant but might actually reduce production?arrow_forwardThe primary source of air pollution in the small town of Smokey, Nevada is a nearby steel mill. The local environmental agency has decided that the mill needs to reduce its emissions because the town's population is located directly downwind from it. Currently the agency is considering three different approaches to reducing pollution from the mill: a technology standard, an emission standard and an emission tax. Why might the owner of the mill prefer an emission standard to a technology standard that would produce the same level of emissions? a Because with emission standards the polluter is more flexible in selecting the technology that will minimize her abatement cost Ob. Because polluters usually try to stick to their existing technology O C. Because it has been proven to be easier to implement O d. Because polluters, as all producers are suspicious about new technologiesarrow_forwardApolluting firm dumps waste into the ocean during production. The loss in value due to damaging the fish stack is valued at $100,000 (you can think of this as lost profits for fishing firms). The firm could eliminate the pollution at a cost of $60,000 a year. Choose the statement that describes the expected efficient outcome if the polluting firm has property rights over the ocean. The firm continues to pollute The polluting firm pays the $60,000 to eliminate pollution The fishing firms pay the $60,000 to eliminate pollution The polluting firm and fishing firms share the $60,000 cost of eliminating pollutionarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning