Two firms operating under oligopoly are faced with two choices, to charge a high price or a low price. If one firm charges a low price while the other a high price, the firm that charges a low price attracts customers and earns a profit of K600,000 while the firm charging a high price loses customers and earns only K100,000. If both firms charge a high price they earn K400,000 each while the both charge a low price, they earn K200,000 each. a) What profits are the firms likely to earn in the absence of cooperation? b) If the firms cooperated, what profits would each one earn? c) The demand curve facing a firm operating under monopoly is given by P = 170 – 5Q; The cost function is given by TC = 40 + 50Q + 5Q² i. What is the maximum profit? i. What is the profit maximizing price elasticity of demand? ii. What is the revenue maximizing price elasticity of demand?

Two firms operating under oligopoly are faced with two choices, to charge a high price or a low price. If one firm charges a low price while the other a high price, the firm that charges a low price attracts customers and earns a profit of K600,000 while the firm charging a high price loses customers and earns only K100,000. If both firms charge a high price they earn K400,000 each while the both charge a low price, they earn K200,000 each. a) What profits are the firms likely to earn in the absence of cooperation? b) If the firms cooperated, what profits would each one earn? c) The demand curve facing a firm operating under monopoly is given by P = 170 – 5Q; The cost function is given by TC = 40 + 50Q + 5Q² i. What is the maximum profit? i. What is the profit maximizing price elasticity of demand? ii. What is the revenue maximizing price elasticity of demand?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two oligopolistic firms have to decide on the pricing strategy. Each can either choose either a high or a low price. If they both choose a high price, each will make $12 million, but if they both choose a low price, each will make $ 8 million. If one sets a high price and other a low one, the low-priced firm will make $16 million, but the high-priced firm will make only $4 million. It is illegal for each firm to communicate with each other. a) Which strategy would both of them ultimately opt for? b) What would be the pay-off for this strategy?
The Bertrand model of oligopoly reveals that: capacity constraints are not important in determining market performance. perfectly competitive prices can arise in markets with only a few firms. changes in marginal cost do not affect prices. All of the statements associated with this question are true. QUESTION 2 If firms are in Cournot equilibrium: each firm could increase profits by unilaterally increasing output. each firm could increase profits by unilaterally decreasing output. firms could increase profits by jointly increasing output. firms could increase profits by jointly reducing output. OOO
Two gas stations in a rural town can engage in collusion over pricing. Because drivers often just stop at the first station they see as they go through town, price competition is not that severe in the first place. Assume either station can price gas at $0.30 above average total cost or $0.50 above average total cost. If they have equal prices, they split the market. If they have unequal prices, the lower price station gets 75% of the market (assume for simplicity no change in the size of the market; price elasticity of demand is very low for short term changes in the price of oil).a. Draw the normal form representation of this game. Identify the key aspects of the game.b. Identify the dominant strategy, if any, for each player.c. Identify any Nash equilibria.
All question are with regards to the following set up. There are two firms A and B. Firmscompete in a Cournot Duopoly in Karhide. They set quantities qA and qB. Inverse demand isP(qA + qB) = 18 − qA − qB and costs are C(q) = 3 ∗ q for both firms. Firm B is a domestic firm(in Karhide,) and firm A is a foreign firm (from Orgoreyn.) The government of Karhide engagesin a strategic trade intervention by giving firm B a per unit subsidy of s. (That is, when firm Bproduces and sells qB units, firm B receives a payment of s ∗ qB from the government.)You must show your work at each step, unless the questions is followed by ”No work required.” We now consider the government’s choice of s ≥ 0. We can see from above thatprofits and outputs depend upon s. With that in mind, let πB(s) and qB(s) denote firm B’s profitand output as a function of the subsidy s. Let qA(s) denote firm A’s equilibrium output as afunction of s. Let G(s) = πB(s) − s ∗ qB(s) denote the government’s objective function (d)…
Calculate the Herfindahl index for a duopoly market where each firm has equal market. Calculate the Herfindahl index for a three-firm oligopoly market in which one firm hasa 80% market share and the other firms each have 10% market share. iii. Calculate the Herfindahl index for a 10-firm oligopoly in which each firm has equal market shares. iv. Which of the above markets is the least competitive? Justify your position.
In the Cournot oliogopoly model, firms compete by setting quantities. In class we noted that as the number of firms in the market grows very large, the outcome looks increasingly like what other model we studied? Provide intuition for your answer.
Suppose two firms compete in quantities (Cournot) in a market in which demand is described by: P=260-2Q. each firm incurs no fixed cost but has a marginal cost of 20. Now imagine they collude to produce the monopoly output. Suppose that after the cartel is established, firm 1 decides to cheat on the collusion, assuming the other firm will continue to produce its half of the monopoly output. What will be firm 1's profit if firm 2 continues producing the monopoly outcome? a. 4500 b. 5200 c.4200 d. 4050 Should firm 2 respond and increas their quantity? Yes or No
Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 1.00 Demand 0.90 Monopoly Outcome 0.80 0.70 MC = ATC 0.60 0.50 + 0.40 0.30 0.20 + 0.10 MR 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) PRICE (Dollars per can)
Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies split the market. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower, since each company must bear the cost of advertising. Yet if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. Refer to Scenario 17-3. What is PM Inc.'s dominant strategy? to advertise only if Brown Inc. does not advertise to refrain from advertising, regardless of whether Brown Inc. advertises to advertise, regardless of whether Brown Inc. advertises to advertise only if Brown Inc. advertises
Explain collusion as practiced most by oligopoly firms. Include in your answer and discussion of cartels and present-day examples of cartels. Kindly provide diagrams in your answer.
Saying there is symmetric knowledge suggests that buyer and seller have a similar knowledge of the good. the seller knows more than the buyer. the buyer knows more than the seller. this firm is in a oligopolistic industry. а. b. с. d.
One key difference between an oligopoly market and a competitive market is that oligopolistic firms sell their products at a price equal to marginal cost while competitive firms do not. decisions made by oligopolistic firms are interdependent while with competitive firms they are not. oligopolistic firms are price takers while competitive firms are not. oligopolistic firms sell completely unrelated products while competitive firms do not.