If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn $4 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn $1 million and the non-advertising firm will earn $5 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for 10 years, then the Nash equilibrium is Multiple Choice for each firm to advertise every year. for neither firm to advertise in early years but to advertise in later years.

If you advertise and your rival advertises, you each will earn $4 million in profits. If neither of you advertises, you will each earn $10 million in profits. However, if one of you advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises will earn $1 million and the non-advertising firm will earn $5 million. If you and your rival plan to be in business for 10 years, then the Nash equilibrium is Multiple Choice for each firm to advertise every year. for neither firm to advertise in early years but to advertise in later years.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two oligopolistic firms have to decide on the pricing strategy. Each can either choose either a high or a low price. If they both choose a high price, each will make $12 million, but if they both choose a low price, each will make $ 8 million. If one sets a high price and other a low one, the low-priced firm will make $16 million, but the high-priced firm will make only $4 million. It is illegal for each firm to communicate with each other. a) Which strategy would both of them ultimately opt for? b) What would be the pay-off for this strategy?
Once again, two ice cream truck vendors, A and B, are playing a simultaneous pricing game. If only one of the vendors prices low, he gets all the customers for a payoff of 12, while the other vendor gets no customers and a payoff of zero. If both vendors price high, they each get a payoff of 6. If both price low, they each get a payoff of 5. Suppose that the above game is repeated indefinitely, and together the vendors adopt a trigger strategy such that they would start charging the low price only if the other vendor charged a low price last time. Provided that the vendors stick to their new strategy, what would be the Nash equilibrium going forward? a) Both the vendors price high b) Both the vendors price low c) Vendor A prices high, vendor B prices low d) Vendor B prices high, vendor A prices low
In the collusion game, collusion was only sustainable in the infinite horizon repeated game. One Nash Equilibrium of that game can be found when all players play a “grim trigger” strategy, where they collude until an opponent chooses to compete, and then compete for all future rounds as a punishment. In such a game, if the one period bonus that comes from competing is low enough, firms always collude and the punishment is never triggered. Is the punishment (vowing to compete forever after one deviates) realistic, especially if firms can communicate freely? Why or why not? (Hint: Is a grim trigger Nash Equilibrium a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium? What kinds of Nash Equilibria does Subgame erfection rule out in sequential games?)
Candie's Chocolates and Kara's Confections are competing candy stores. Both of them are thinking about opening a store in the town of Economicville. If Kara's opens a store in Economicville and Candie's determines that it is not profitable to also open a store, then Group of answer choices: a Nash equilibrium is not possible in this game. this is a zero-sum game. this is a simultaneous game. Kara's had a first-mover advantage in this game.
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $30 million, $20 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy a dominant strategy. O True Small Budget $70 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. O False True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)
Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit- maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of s million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it…
Consider the following three-stage duopoly game. There are two firms in the market: Firm 1 and Firm 2. In the first stage, a first-price auction is conducted to determine the order of moves. The firm with the highest bid (first mover) pays a cost equivalent to its bid and chooses its action in the second stage. After observing this action, the other firm (second mover) chooses its action in the third stage. When there is a tie in the first stage (both firms submit the same bid), a coin is tossed to determine the winner, and only the winner pays its bid. Each firm has the following three possible actions: small (expansion), medium (expansion) and large (expansion), and the payoffs they obtain in the market (not the final payoffs yet) are shown below: The second mover Small Medium Large 16, 12 Medium 18, 8 19, 7 13, 10 14, 11 Small 9, 9 10, 13 12, 10 The first mover Large 14, 12 The final payoff is equivalent to the payoff obtained in the market minus the cost (if any) paid in auction.…
Suppose that Expresso and Beantown are the only two firms that sell coffee. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Beantown Advertise Doesn't Advertise Expresso Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Expresso advertises and Beantown doesn't advertise, Expresso will make a profit of $15 million, and Beantown will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Expresso and Beantown are both profit-maximizing firms. If Expresso decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of million if Beantown advertises and a profit of million if Beantown does not advertise. If Expresso decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of million if Beantown advertises and a profit of million if Beantown does not advertise. If Beantown advertises, Expresso makes a higher profit if…
Problem 5.1. The inverse market demand for printer paper is given by P = 400 – 2Q. There are two firms who compete to produce this paper, each with a marginal cost of production equal to c = 40 over a large range of output (ie, assume constant marginal cost). The two firms compete in quantities, in other words they each simultaneously choose a quantity to produce (Cournot competition). Derive the Cournot-Nash equilibrium of this game. Please write final answers in the boxes, showing work in blank areas. (a) The reaction function for each firm. 91 (92): 92 (91) (b) Optimal output q for each firm. 92 = р = = π1 = (c) Market price (from demand curve). (d) Firm profits. 92 = π2 =
Consider a market with two firms, Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Dell, that sell printers. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($400) or a low price ($350) for their printers. These price strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the bavoli matris to the right. HP's profits are in red and Dell's are in blue. Suppose HP and Dell are initially at the game's Nash equilibrium. Then, HP and Dell advertise that they will match any lower price of their competitors. For example, if HP charges $350, then Dell will match that price and also charge $350. What effect will matching prices have on profits (relative to the Nash equilibrium without price matching)? Assuming HP and Dell can coordinate to maximize profits, HP's profit will change by $ and Dell's profit will change by (Enter either positive or negative numeric responses using integers.) Price $400 Dell Price $350 HP Price = $400 Price $350 $80 $90 $80 $20 $20 $50 $90 $50 G
To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Creamland Advertise 10, 10 18, 2 Doesn't Advertise 2, 18 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $18 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of _________ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of ________ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of __________ million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of _________…
Team 2 plays A Team 2 plays B Team 1 plays A 0, 24 10, 10 Team 1 plays B 4, 4 24, 0 Consider the infinitely repeated version of the game above. Which of the following is the smallest discount factor such that the grim trigger strategy under which team 1 plays A and team 2 plays B until a team deviates, after which team 1 plays B forever and team 2 plays A forever is a Nash Equilibrium? 1/100 1/2 3/4