Deterring rivals is a major part of competitive strategy.  Consider the following entry-deterrence game. A potential entrant has two strategies, “Enter” or “Stay Out”.  An incumbent firm can either ‘Price Low’ or ‘Price High’, depending on whether they want to try to fight or accommodate the entrant.  (Applying what we learned this week, the Price Low option could be a limit price, for example.  See text). Suppose if the entrant Enters and the incumbent Prices Low, both firms lose $-1M.   If the entrant enters and the incumbent Prices High, each firm earns $2M.    If the Entrant doesn’t enter, the incumbent earns $4M and the entrant earns $0.   a)Using the concept of Nash Equilibrium, what are the predicted strategies and profits?  Set up your own game box or tree using the profits above and explain your reasoning. b) Give an example of a different profit outcome that would lead to a different Nash Equilibrium. (From this, you can see that sometimes deterrence is effective and sometimes it isn’t, depending on the profits). c)What can you conclude about when / what makes entry deterrence is effective?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

Deterring rivals is a major part of competitive strategy.

 Consider the following entry-deterrence game.

A potential entrant has two strategies, “Enter” or “Stay Out”.  An incumbent firm can either ‘Price Low’ or ‘Price High’, depending on whether they want to try to fight or accommodate the entrant.  (Applying what we learned this week, the Price Low option could be a limit price, for example.  See text).

Suppose if the entrant Enters and the incumbent Prices Low, both firms lose $-1M.   If the entrant enters and the incumbent Prices High, each firm earns $2M.    If the Entrant doesn’t enter, the incumbent earns $4M and the entrant earns $0.

 

a)Using the concept of Nash Equilibrium, what are the predicted strategies and profits?  Set up your own game box or tree using the profits above and explain your reasoning.

b) Give an example of a different profit outcome that would lead to a different Nash Equilibrium. (From this, you can see that sometimes deterrence is effective and sometimes it isn’t, depending on the profits).

c)What can you conclude about when / what makes entry deterrence is effective?

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Best Response Function
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education