Competing hip-hop dancers, 1 and 2, interact in a one-shot, simultaneous-move game. Each dancer has two possible dance moves:moonwalk or arm wave. Payoffs are given in the table below.Dancer 1:MoonwalkDancer 1:Arm WaveDancer 2:MoonwalkDancer 1: 11Dancer 2:4Dancer 1: 3Dancer 2: 5a. What is dancer 1's dominant strategy?(Click to select)b. What is dancer 2's dominant strategy?(Click to select)c. Is this game a prisoner's dilemma?(Click to select)Dancer 2:Arm WaveDancer 1:8Dancer 2: 6Dancer 1: 9Dancer 2: 12d. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game?(Click to select)

“Since you have posted multiple questions with multiple sub parts, we will provide the solution only…

Competing hip-hop dancers, 1 and 2, interact in a one-shot, simultaneous-move game. Each dancer has two possible dance moves: moonwalk or arm wave. Payoffs are given in the table below. Dancer 1: Moonwalk Dancer 1: Arm Wave Dancer 2: Moonwalk Dancer 1: 11 Dancer 2: 4 Dancer 1:3 Dancer 2:5 What is dancer 1's dominant strategy? (Click to select) b. What is dancer 2's dominant strategy? (Click to select) c. Is this game a prisoner's dilemma? (Click to select) Dancer 2: Arm Wave Dancer 1: 8 Dancer 2:6 Dancer 1: 9 Dancer 2: 12 d. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? (Click to select)

Competing hip-hop dancers, 1 and 2, interact in a one-shot, simultaneous-move game. Each dancer has two possible dance moves: moonwalk or arm wave. Payoffs are given in the table below. Dancer 1: Moonwalk Dancer 1: Arm Wave Dancer 2: Moonwalk Dancer 1: 11 Dancer 2: 4 Dancer 1:3 Dancer 2:5 What is dancer 1's dominant strategy? (Click to select) b. What is dancer 2's dominant strategy? (Click to select) c. Is this game a prisoner's dilemma? (Click to select) Dancer 2: Arm Wave Dancer 1: 8 Dancer 2:6 Dancer 1: 9 Dancer 2: 12 d. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? (Click to select)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

i need the answer quickly
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
Consider the following 2-player normal form game. Player 2 Bananas Orange Player 1 Grapes 11, 3 8, 2 Apple 9, 7 6, 5 Player 1's dominant strategy is [Select ] and Player 2's dominant strategy is [ Select ) The Nash Equilibrium of this game is ( Select ) (select all that apply).
Player 1 Cooperate (C) Defect (D) If the game has a dominant strategy, what is it? There is none. If the game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, what is it? There is none. Cooperate (C) 3,3 8,0 Cooperate (C) is a dominant strategy for both players. Defect (D) is a dominant strategy for both players. Cooperate (C) is a dominant strategy for 1, and Defect (D) is a dominant strategy for 2. C, C is the only Nash equilibrium. D, D is the only Nash equilibrium. C, C and D, D are both Nash equilibria. Player 2 Defect (D) 0,8 1,1
QUESTION 3 Up Down In the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? Ⓒ (up,up) (up,down) Player 1 (down, up) (down, down) No equilibrium exists Up Down Up Down Player 2 P1 gets $25 P2 gets $25 P1 gets $7 P2 gets $30 P1 gets $13 P2 gets $9 P1 gets $8 P2 gets $6
Player 2 Left Right P1: $4 Player 1 Up P2: $1 P1: $10 Down P2:s10 Which of the Nash Equilibrium to this game are efficient? [Check all that apply] A) (up, left) B) (down, left) C None are efficient (D) (up right) E (down, right) Last saved 4:31:15 PM P1:S1 P2: $6 P1: $0 P2: $11 Grading
(The Beckhams' dilemma) Victoria and David are husband and wife. They both prefer ciean to dirty house but neither likes to clean the house. Their payoffs are given in the table below. Victoria Clean Don't clean 0,8 Clean 5,5 David Don't clean 8,0 1,1 a) Let say they play the clean house game only once, what is the Nash equilibrium? b) Let say Victoria and David has to decide whether to clean or not every day for indefinite number of days. How grim-trigger strategy will be our subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? In other words, what is the patience rate that ensure Victoria and David maintain the cleanliness of the house?
Game Theory
Player 1 Up Down [Select] Left 2,4 6,5 Player 2 In the above game, player 1 would play [Select] Right 1,0 4,2 , player 2 would play resulting in a Nash Equilibrium of [Select]
Image attched
No written by hand solution
16