Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can ofbeer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for eachfirm.Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this modelrequires that the two companies must equally share the output.)Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays andMcCovey choose to work together.1.00Demand0.90Monopoly Outcome0.800.70MC = ATC0.600.50 +0.400.300.20 +0.10MR1002003004005006007008009001000QUANTITY (Cans of beer)PRICE (Dollars per can) When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will producecans and chargeper can. Given thisinformation, each firm earns a daily profit of $|, so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is $Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume thetwo companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit.Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by 50%, while McCovey continues to produce the amount set under thecollusive agreement.Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer towhile McCovey's profit is now $toper can. Mays's profit is nowTherefore, you can conclude that total industry profitwhenMays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity.

In a perfectly competitive market, the value approaches negligible expense and firms acquire a…

Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for ea firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 1.00 Demand 0.90 Monopoly Outcome 0.80 0.70 MC = ATC 0.60 0.50 + 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 PRICE (Dollars per can)

Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for ea firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 1.00 Demand 0.90 Monopoly Outcome 0.80 0.70 MC = ATC 0.60 0.50 + 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 PRICE (Dollars per can)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In an industry with inverse demand curve there are five firms, each of which has a constant marginal cost given by p = 100 - 2Q, MC = 20. If the firms form a profit-maximizing cartel and agree to operate subject to the constraint that each firm will produce the same output level, how much does each firm produce? Each firm will produce q = units. (Enter your response as a whole number.)
Suppose that all firms in an industry collude to reduce output, which raises the product price to $7.86 and requires the perfectly competitive firm in the figure to the right to reduce its output from 500 units to 200 units. What is the total dollar amount of this typical perfectly competitive firm's economic incentive to join the proposed cartel, assuming that after the fact, no firms cheat on the specified cartel agreement? Explain your reasoning. In the absense of collusion among the firms, the typical perfectly competitive firm's economic profits are average total cost. because price Using the rectangle drawing tool, show the amount of economic profits for the typical perfectly competitive firm if it joins the cartel Label this area 'Profits." Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required object If ATC $5.33 at the reduced output of 200 units, then the typical firm's economic incentive to participate in the cartel is $(Enter your response as a whole number.)…
If Gulfstream and Bombardier, both producers of upscale jet airplanes, were to collude rather than compete, consumers could expect: Group of answer choices A) higher prices and higher quantities offered for sale. B) higher prices and lower quantities offered for sale. C) one firm to emerge as the price leader in the oligopoly. D) lower prices and lower quantities offered for sale. E) each firm to cheat on the cartel agreement.
2. Deviating from the collusive outcome Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.20 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. (Dollars per can) PRICE 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 0 Demand MC = ATC MR 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) Monopoly Outcome (2)
Consider a duopolistic market with an inverse demand curve P(Q) = 460 − 4Qand constant marginal costs for each firm that are given by MC(Q) = 10.Assume fixed costs are negligible. The two identical firms are competing in this market by choosing their production quantities simultaneously. In the equilibrium, each firm produces 37.5 units and the prevailing market price is 160. How would the joint profits of these two firms change if they successfully formed a cartel? Change in joint profits: ? (Enter your answer rounded to two decimal places; include a negative sign if appropriate.)
Airline Manufacturer A and Airline Manufacturer B are duopolists in their industry. Explain how the two firms could collectively benefit if they were to collude and form a cartel. Why might collusion be difficult?
What kind of barriers to entry exist in oligopoly? (Give any two examples)
Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and Cargill are the biggest makers of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), used to sweeten Coke, Pepsi, and other non-diet soft drinks. Each firm is currently choosing between increasing or decreasing their price for HFCS. The table below gives each firm's profits in each possible situation. A is Archer Daniels Midland and C is Cargill. For purposes of this question, ignore the existence of other HFCS makers. Cargill P increase P decrease P increase A: $500 million A: $200 million C: $400 million C: $500 million ADM P decrease A: $600 million A: $350 million C: $200 million C: $300 million a. Assuming the two firms do not cooperate, does either have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? b. If ADM and Cargill decide to cooperate, how, if at all, will the outcome differ from part a? Would this case be an evample of a repeated or a pon-reneated game?
Question 1 Suppose the romaine lettuce industry is a Cournot duopoly with the following two firms: Amalgamated Romaine (a) and Best Romaine (b). The (inverse) market demand schedule is: p = 262 -0.5Q Amalgamated Romaine has the following cost structure: MCATC₁ = $6 Best Romaine has a different cost structure: MC₁ = ATC₁ = $8 Find the following in Cournot-Nash equilibrium. a. Output of Amalgamated Romaine = b. Output of Best Romaine = c. Cournot duopoly equilibrium price = $ units units 3 pts
Suppose Canon raised the price of its printers, but Hewlett-Packard (the largest seller) refused to follow. Two years later, Canon cut its price, and Hewlett-Packard retaliated with an even deeper price cut, which Canon was forced to match. For the next five years, Hewlett- Packard raised its prices five times, and each time, Canon followed suit within 24 hours. The model underlying the pricing behavior of these firms is the: Cartel model O Perfect competition model Nonprice competition model Price leadership model
Suppose that two mining companies, Australian Minerals Company (AMC) and South African Mines, Inc. (SAMI), control the only sources of a rare mineral used in making certain electronic components. The companies have agreed to form a cartel to set the (profit-maximizing) price of the mineral. Each company must decide whether to abide by the agreement (i.e., not offer secret price cuts to customers) or not abide (i.e., offer secret price cuts to customers). If both companies abide by the agreement, AMC will earn an annual profit of $36 million and SAMI will earn an annual profit of $24 million from sales of the mineral. If AMC does not abide and SAMI abides by the agreement, then AMC earns $48 million and SAMI earns $6 million. If SAMI does not abide and AMC abides by the agreement, then AMC earns $12 million and SAMI earns $36 million. If both companies do not abide by the agreement, then AMC earns $18 million and SAMI earns $12 million. Complete the following payoff matrix using the…
1