The Andrews Company has just purchased $59,448,000 of plant and equipment that has an estimated useful life of 15 years. The expected salvage value at the end of 15 years is $5,944,800. What will the book value of this purchase (exclude all other plant and equipment) be after its second year of use? (Use FASB GAAP) Select : 1 $51,521,600 $47,558,400 $52,314,240 $46,369,440

The Andrews Company has just purchased $59,448,000 of plant and equipment that has an estimated useful life of 15 years. The expected salvage value at the end of 15 years is $5,944,800. What will the book value of this purchase (exclude all other plant and equipment) be after its second year of use? (Use FASB GAAP) Select : 1 $51,521,600 $47,558,400 $52,314,240 $46,369,440

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.1SA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Sheffield Inc. wants to replace its current equipment with new high-tech equipment. The existing equipment was purchased 5 years ago at a cost of $129,000. At that time, the equipment had an expected life of 10 years, with no expected salvage value. The equipment is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. Currently, the market value of the old equipment is $43, 800. The new equipment can be bought for $176, 540, including installation. Over its 10-year life, it will reduce operating expenses from $192, 300 to $147, 200 for the first six years, and from $200, 400 to $190, 200 for the last four years. Net working capital requirements will also increase by $20, 600 at the time of replacement.It is estimated that the company can sell the new equipment for $24, 600 at the end of its life. Since the new equipment's cash flows are relatively certain, the project's cost of capital is set at 9%, compared with 15% for an average - risk project. The firm's maximum acceptable payback period is…
The andrews company has just..accounting q
Chatham Automotive purchased new electric forklifts to move steel automobile parts two years ago. They cost $65,000 each, including the charging stand. In practice, it was found that they did not hold a charge as long as claimed by the manufacturer, so operating costs are very high. As a result, their current salvage value is about $9,000. Chatham is considering replacing them with propane models. New propane forklifts cost $58,000 each. After one year, they have a salvage value of $40,000, and thereafter decline in value at a declining-balance depreciation rate of 20 percent, as does the electric model from this time on. The MARR is 8 percent. Operating costs for the electric model will be $19,000 this year, rising by 12 percent per year. Operating costs for the propane model will initially be $11,000 over the first year, rising by 12 percent per year. Should Chatham Automotive replace the forklifts now? Find EAC for both propane and elctric forklifts. P.S. Show…
An Elevator Leg and Transfer Conveyor used in the manufacture of grain is purchased and installed for $325,000. The equipment is placed into service on June 1st and is removed on December 15th approximately 4.5 years from the date placed in service. Salvage value is $15,000. Using MACRS, what is the book value for year 4 (B4)?
Problem 3-11 Future Value of Reduced Spending [LO3-4] Brenda plans to reduce her spending by $80 a month. Calculate the future value of this increase in savings over the next 10 years. (Assume an annual deposit to her savings account, and an annual interest rate of 4 percent.) (Exhibit 1-A, Exhibit 1-B, Exhibit 1-C, Exhibit 1-D) Note: Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided. Round time value factor to 3 decimal places and final answer to 2 decimal places. Future value
Use excel and show formulas Benson Enterprises is deciding when to replace its old machine. The machine’s current salvage value is $1.2 million. Its current book value is $1 million. If not sold, the old machine will require maintenance costs of $420,000 at the end of the year for the next five years. Depreciation on theold machine is $200,000 per year. At the end of five years, it will have a salvage value of $220,000. A replacement machine costs $3.5 million now and requires maintenance costs of $160,000 at the end of each year during its economic life of five years. At the end of five years, the new machinewill have a salvage value of $540,000. It will be fully depreciated using the three-year MACRS schedule. In five years a replacement machine will cost $4,000,000. Pilot will need to purchase this machine regardless of what choice it makes today. The corporate tax is 35 percent and theappropriate discount rate is 10 percent. The company is assumed to earn sufficient revenues to…
Rubatex Corporation manufactures rubber and foam for a variety of products, including artificial turf housing and insulation, hockey helmet liners, scuba diving suits, sports sandals and mouse pads. The company was purchased by an investment firm called American industrial partners (AIP) that has so far earned only a 1 percent return on its investment. Obviously the company is having problems. Its sales are up but earnings are down. In the first three months after acquisition, the company lost $2 million on $68 million in sales. Understandably, AIP wants to know why and is demanding aggressive action. Employees at the Bedford, Virginia, plant say they know something’s wrong. The plant is hot and dirty and crumbling, and they are working harder to produce items of poorer quality. Fewer than 7 of 10 orders are shipped on time, and 2% of sales are returned as defective. Built in 1924, the plant sprawls over 14 buildings, with only the offices and lunchroom air-conditioned. Equipment is…
Alternative Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 State of Nature Outcome 1 ($) 800 500 700 0.62 Probability according to the payoff table? OEMV (Alternative 1) = $900 EMV (Alternative 3) is the highest EMV EMV (Alternative 2) = EMV (Alternative 3) EMV (Alternative 1) is the highest EMV Outcome 2 ($) 1000 1200 900 0.38 Which of the following statements is correct
Assume that a company is considering buying a new piece of equipment for $240,000 that would have a useful life of five years and no salvage value. The equipment would generate the following estimated annual revenues and expenses: Commissions Insurance Revenues $ 112,400 Less operating expenses: $ 15,000 5,000 48,000 30,000 98,000 $ 14,400 Depreciation Maintenance Net operating income Click here to view Exhibit 12B-1 and Exhibit 12B-2, to determine the appropriate discount factor(s) using the tables provided. The internal rate of return for this investment is closest to