Response to Natisha Henry Crest is the item I choose. Instead of trying to maximize profits initially with a high price, as would be done with a "market skimming" strategy, Crest primarily uses a market penetration pricing strategy for its toothpaste products. This means that they set a relatively low price to quickly gain a significant market share and attract a large customer base. Since Crest toothpaste is positioned as a dependable, well-known brand with a solid reputation for cavity prevention, supported by in-depth research and the American Dental Association's (ADA) seal of approval, its pricing typically reflects its perceived value. For many users, the toothpaste's perceived quality and effectiveness make the price point justifiable. A more aggressive price-competitive strategy could potentially capture more market share by attracting price-conscious buyers, but it might also impact brand perception if not carefully managed alongside quality messaging. Crest toothpaste's lower price point is likely to motivate price-sensitive consumers, while those seeking premium quality or specific features may be dissuaded by a low price, potentially perceiving it as inferior. How much control do you think the Crest has over pricing its toothpaste while remaining competitive, and what would your recommendation be for either maintaining the same pricing strategy or adapting to another pricing strategy based on the information in the post?
Response to Natisha Henry
Crest is the item I choose. Instead of trying to maximize profits initially with a high price, as would be done with a "market skimming" strategy, Crest primarily uses a market penetration pricing strategy for its toothpaste products. This means that they set a relatively low price to quickly gain a significant market share and attract a large customer base. Since Crest toothpaste is positioned as a dependable, well-known brand with a solid reputation for cavity prevention, supported by in-depth research and the American Dental Association's (ADA) seal of approval, its pricing typically reflects its perceived value. For many users, the toothpaste's perceived quality and effectiveness make the price point justifiable. A more aggressive price-competitive strategy could potentially capture more market share by attracting price-conscious buyers, but it might also impact brand perception if not carefully managed alongside quality messaging. Crest toothpaste's lower price point is likely to motivate price-sensitive consumers, while those seeking premium quality or specific features may be dissuaded by a low price, potentially perceiving it as inferior.
- How much control do you think the Crest has over pricing its toothpaste while remaining competitive, and what would your recommendation be for either maintaining the same pricing strategy or adapting to another pricing strategy based on the information in the post?
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
Unlock instant AI solutions
Tap the button
to generate a solution
