Please original work Background information: The evaluation and control process in research and development is critical.Consider the following facts: It takes one hundred research ideas to generate about ten development projects. Only two of those ten projects will make it to commercialization. Only one of the two will make money. In Great Britain and the United States, about half of the development money is spent on projects that never reach the market.(Parker, K., and M. Mainelli. 2001. Great Mistakes in Technology Commercialization. Strategic Change, 10: 383 390.) Background information: The result of such development patterns is that firms such as Microsoft will spend over $3 million on development costs for each patent it files. There are numerous stories of firms that failed at research and development processes. For example, in developing a new aircraft engine, one test the engine must pass is the chicken test. As you might expect, an aircraft engine must be able to have a bird hit the engine, and the blades in that jet engine must remain structurally sound. The bird cannot destroy the engine if it accidently strikes it. If a jet engine cannot pass this test, the ability of the jet to take off safely is very limited. One of the major aircraft manufacturers in the world is Rolls-Royce. When developing a new engine, the firm assumed that its new carbon fiber blades could withstand the strike of a bird. They did not when ultimately tested. The result was that much of the engineering and development efforts prior to this point were wasted. What lesson should Rolls-Royce have learned? What suggested changes in the evaluation process would you make? What is an example that you have seen in your working career of a failure to properly evaluate and control a process or project. Please cite in text references and add weblinks
Please original work Background information: The evaluation and control process in research and development is critical.Consider the following facts: It takes one hundred research ideas to generate about ten development projects. Only two of those ten projects will make it to commercialization. Only one of the two will make money. In Great Britain and the United States, about half of the development money is spent on projects that never reach the market.(Parker, K., and M. Mainelli. 2001. Great Mistakes in Technology Commercialization. Strategic Change, 10: 383 390.) Background information: The result of such development patterns is that firms such as Microsoft will spend over $3 million on development costs for each patent it files. There are numerous stories of firms that failed at research and development processes. For example, in developing a new aircraft engine, one test the engine must pass is the chicken test. As you might expect, an aircraft engine must be able to have a bird hit the engine, and the blades in that jet engine must remain structurally sound. The bird cannot destroy the engine if it accidently strikes it. If a jet engine cannot pass this test, the ability of the jet to take off safely is very limited. One of the major aircraft manufacturers in the world is Rolls-Royce. When developing a new engine, the firm assumed that its new carbon fiber blades could withstand the strike of a bird. They did not when ultimately tested. The result was that much of the engineering and development efforts prior to this point were wasted. What lesson should Rolls-Royce have learned? What suggested changes in the evaluation process would you make? What is an example that you have seen in your working career of a failure to properly evaluate and control a process or project. Please cite in text references and add weblinks
Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305502215
Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Chapter15: Managing Quality And Performance
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1GL: Create a Group Control System Step 1 Form into groups of three to five students. Each group will...
Related questions
Question
Please original work
Background information:
The evaluation and control process in research and development is critical.
Consider the following facts:
Consider the following facts:
It takes one hundred research ideas to generate about ten development projects.
Only two of those ten projects will make it to commercialization.
Only one of the two will make money.
In Great Britain and the United States, about half of the development money is spent on projects that never reach the market.(Parker, K., and M. Mainelli. 2001. Great Mistakes in Technology Commercialization. Strategic Change, 10: 383 390.)
Background information: The result of such development patterns is that firms such as Microsoft will spend over $3 million on development costs for each patent it files. There are numerous stories of firms that failed at research and development processes. For example, in developing a new aircraft engine, one test the engine must pass is the chicken test. As you might expect, an aircraft engine must be able to have a bird hit the engine, and the blades in that jet engine must remain structurally sound. The bird cannot destroy the engine if it accidently strikes it. If a jet engine cannot pass this test, the ability of the jet to take off safely is very limited. One of the major aircraft manufacturers in the world is Rolls-Royce. When developing a new engine, the firm assumed that its new carbon fiber blades could withstand the strike of a bird. They did not when ultimately tested. The result was that much of the engineering and development efforts prior to this point were wasted.
What lesson should Rolls-Royce have learned?
What suggested changes in the evaluation process would you make?
What is an example that you have seen in your working career of a failure to properly evaluate and control a process or project.
Please cite in text references and add weblinks
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
Management
ISBN:
9781305502215
Author:
Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:
9781305969308
Author:
Richard L. Daft
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub
Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
Management
ISBN:
9781305502215
Author:
Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:
9781305969308
Author:
Richard L. Daft
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub