One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept after it. Pick that mismatched case. O A 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment constituting sexual harassment. OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII. O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept after it. Pick that mismatched case. O A 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment constituting sexual harassment. OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII. O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
Related questions
Question
![One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept
after it. Pick that mismatched case.
OA 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of
that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these
customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment
constituting sexual harassment.
OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's
religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably
possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII.
O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case
concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
O The offshore oil rig U.S. Supreme Court case of 1998- The case concerned sexual harassment.
O A June 2020 U.S. Supreme Court holding about Title VII - While the Equality Act of 2019 (an unenacted bill -
passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, but not the U.S. Senate) was not at issue, the Supreme Court's
6-3 decision in effect found that the Equality Act's provisions against employment discrimination on account
of sexual orientation or gender identity are already present in Title VII.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F6c8ff118-2529-47dd-a2db-d9a8394b3573%2Fa9f87f75-1d06-420c-a2aa-3087625dec08%2Fawi72j_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept
after it. Pick that mismatched case.
OA 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of
that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these
customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment
constituting sexual harassment.
OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's
religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably
possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII.
O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case
concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
O The offshore oil rig U.S. Supreme Court case of 1998- The case concerned sexual harassment.
O A June 2020 U.S. Supreme Court holding about Title VII - While the Equality Act of 2019 (an unenacted bill -
passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, but not the U.S. Senate) was not at issue, the Supreme Court's
6-3 decision in effect found that the Equality Act's provisions against employment discrimination on account
of sexual orientation or gender identity are already present in Title VII.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)