One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept after it. Pick that mismatched case. O A 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment constituting sexual harassment. OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII. O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept after it. Pick that mismatched case. O A 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment constituting sexual harassment. OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII. O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept
after it. Pick that mismatched case.
OA 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of
that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these
customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment
constituting sexual harassment.
OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's
religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably
possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII.
O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case
concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
O The offshore oil rig U.S. Supreme Court case of 1998- The case concerned sexual harassment.
O A June 2020 U.S. Supreme Court holding about Title VII - While the Equality Act of 2019 (an unenacted bill -
passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, but not the U.S. Senate) was not at issue, the Supreme Court's
6-3 decision in effect found that the Equality Act's provisions against employment discrimination on account
of sexual orientation or gender identity are already present in Title VII.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
