For years, Delaney has lived in a house on Shiflet Street that has a 15-foot setback, which was legal when it was built. Zoning regulations changed to now require a 20-foot setback in her neighborhood. Her home isn't hurting anyone, so Delaney was allowed to keep her home the way it is. What is this an example of? illegal nonconforming use special exception legal nonconforming use buffer zoning

For years, Delaney has lived in a house on Shiflet Street that has a 15-foot setback, which was legal when it was built. Zoning regulations changed to now require a 20-foot setback in her neighborhood. Her home isn't hurting anyone, so Delaney was allowed to keep her home the way it is. What is this an example of? illegal nonconforming use special exception legal nonconforming use buffer zoning

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

what is the difference between an immoral and an illegal act? provide and example
a 45 year old patient was under doctor care for the past twenty years for chronic arthritis, trying many different drugs without success. A new drug appeared having been ceritifed by health canada and the doctor explained that like all the rest, the drug would have a range of side effects, among which was possible depression. The patient took the drug and within a week suffered a mood swing and committed suicide. Concerned by this new and two other cases, Health Canada suspended the drug from Canada, pending durtehr review. The family of deceased sued the paharmaceautical maker and Health Canada. Aside form issues of the doctor's possible professional liability, discuss the issues of manufacturer's liability and negligence raised in this scenario
With this interpretation found from OSHA that stipulates that on portable ladders you do not need fall protection. So doesn't that go against the 6'-0" rule? They say it is because in that instance it can be more dangerous to have it. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2000-01-13
The significance of the Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon decision is that for the first time it recognized the concept of: Group of answer choices physical takings. excessively burdensome taxation. regulatory takings. the danger of land subsidence from too much coal mining.
What is the Parol Evidence Rule? Please describe one circumstance in which you believe the rule should be followed and why? Please describe a circumstance in which you believe the rule should not be followed and why? Please not, this is business law question. Thank you.
Pollution remediation obligations should be recognized if which of the following obligating events has occurred? Multiple Choice A violation of a pollution prevention permit has occurred. All of the given items are obligating events that would require recognition of a pollution remediation obligation. The government is compelled to take remediation action due to imminent endangerment to the public health. The government is named or will be named as the responsible or potentially responsible party to a remediation.
A transit officer sees a 2-year-old child walking along the edge of a train station by herself. The officer realizes that it looks strange and dangerous that she is walking very close to the edge. While the child is standing next to the officer she prepares to jump onto the tracks. The officer could have could have grabbed her and pulled her back onto the platform, but he chose not to do so. Unfortunately, the child gets hit by a train and dies. The parents, were nearby and didn’t notice that their child walked away from them, sue the officer and the city for damages. What is the probable outcome of their suit? What if it wasn’t an officer but just another rider on the subway?
Should the cost of compliance be considered when imposing air pollution regulation?
Can legal gambling have any harmful effects? Describe a form of legal gambling that takes place and some of its harmful effects. If it is harmful why is it allowed in the first place? Is there a way to mitigate these harmful effects?
Business Law Discuss what is intoxication in law ? How can an person avoid a contract entered into under intoxication? You need to provide appropriate case laws to support your answer. You are required to research relevant case laws on this matter and discuss in detail. Identify at least THREE (3) recent (Between 2000- 2023) Case Laws and discuss in detail the basic fact outcomes in those cases.
In December 2020, the High Court in Mahikeng, the capital of South Africa’s North West Province, made a controversial order after finding that the Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality was in breach of its legal obligations. The municipality had failed to deliver water and sanitation. It had also failed to prevent environmental pollution in the towns of Koster and Swartruggens. The court issued an interim order that the municipal manager be jailed for 90 days, unless the municipality urgently restored water services and stopped sewage flowing into the local rivers. It also ordered that, unless the municipality acted quickly, a local residents’ association could take control of the water and sewerage systems. The state would then have to pay the residents for doing the municipality’s job. Shortly afterwards, the residents took over delivery of water and sanitation and managed to restore both systems to working order. The municipality strongly objected to the take-over. But, in January, the…
n loses his dog. He posts signs in his neighborhood offering a $500 reward for the safe return of his dog. Jill happens upon the dog, knows its Tom's, and promptly returns the dog to Tom. Upon learning of the reward, she says "I returned your dog and now I see there's a reward; I want my money." Which of the following is more likely than the others as a result? Jill gets the reward. Through her actions, she formed a bilateral contract. Jill gets the reward. Public policy requires people to return things to their rightful owners. Jill does not get the reward because there is no in rem jurisdiction for a court to have the power to enforce the reward. Jill does not get the reward because the offer had not been communicated to her.