n loses his dog. He posts signs in his neighborhood offering a $500 reward for thesafe return of his dog. Jill happens upon the dog, knows its Tom's, and promptlyreturns the dog to Tom. Upon learning of the reward, she says "I returned your dogand now I see there's a reward; I want my money." Which of the following is morelikely than the others as a result?Jill gets the reward. Through her actions, she formed a bilateral contract.Jill gets the reward. Public policy requires people to return things to their rightfulowners.Jill does not get the reward because there is no in rem jurisdiction for a court tohave the power to enforce the reward.Jill does not get the reward because the offer had not been communicated toher.

Contract refers to the legal agreement between two parties which creates an obligation to perform or…

Answered: n loses his dog. He posts signs in his…

Similar questions

A local builder offers to place with you insurance on every house he/she builds while it is under construction. In return, he/she wants you to allow him/her 20 % discount off the premium required by insurers. How would you respond to comply with RIBO Regulations? OA) You can only allow a five percent (5%) discount because of your overhead and expenses. OB) You will pay the builder a flat $10.00 fee for each house, but it is contrary to RIBO Regulations to discount the premium. OC) You refuse to pay the builder anything, since it would contravene RIBO Regulations. OD) You offer the builder a 20% premium refund for those houses that have no claims while under construction.
A pilot for a private jet stops for refueling in San Antonio. Topper Fuels offers him a case of premium Tequila to refuel with them (a total retail value of $423 to the pilot). For refueling, inspections, and minor repairs, Topper charges $2,900, over $400 more than the least expensive fuel company. What has happened to the company that owns the private jet
Pacific Southern Airlines (PSA) had an unhappy customer. Cynthia Mercier-Walters flew from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Phoenix, Arizona. The flight stopped briefly at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where she got off the plane for half an hour. When she returned to her seat, her $400 prescription reading glasses were gone. She asked the flight attendant where the glasses were, and the attendant said they probably were thrown away since the cleaning crew had come in with big bags and tossed everything in them. Ms. Mercier-Walters tried to locate the glasses through the airline’s lost-and-found service, but she failed. Then she wrote a strong letter to the airline demanding reimbursement for the loss. She felt that it was obvious that she was returning to her seat. The airline, however, knows that an overwhelming number of passengers arriving at hubs switch planes for their connecting flights. The airline does not know who is returning. What’s more, flight attendants…
13. Sam Fraser, 24 years of age and single, possesses a two-year-old vehicle which he drives to work (a distance of 7(1/2) miles, full circle). He keeps the vehicle in 03 region, and has had one auto crash during the previous three years. What amount would Sam save money on a mix of $100-deductible impact and thorough inclusion on the off chance that he drove a vehicle delegated image 1 instead of as image 5? We don't know whether Sam has had driver preparing.
A coach who fails to explain the risk involved with their sport and this results in a catastrophic injury to an athlete is guilty of:
Michael built a calculator (which graphs) using plans Michael found posted on the internet, but he unreasonably didn’t follow the plans when he constructed the calculator. Michael then sold the calculator to Jack who was injured when the calculator exploded because it hadn’t been built according to the plans. After the explosion Jack was taken to the Hospital emergency room (“ER”) where he signed a consent form authorizing Dr. Joe, the ER doctor, to perform a surgical procedure called Surgery X. But, instead Dr. Joe performed Surgery Y, a different procedure than Surgery X. A. What cause(s) of action should Jack use if he sues Michael for Jack’s injuries. Discuss. B. Has Joe, the ER doctor, committed any intentional torts? If so, discuss.
1) A misdemeanor is a more serious crime than a felony. Why its false? 2) You accidentally take someone’s mink coat by mistake. You have committed theft. Why its false? 3) Robbery is the taking of property without force. Why its false? 4) If you find a signed and endorsed check, and you cash it, you have committed forgery. Why its false? 5) If you break into an apartment in order to escape a meteor shower, you have committed burglary. Why its false? 6) If a bank robber forces you, a bank customer, to kill a teller, and you do, you will be found innocent. Why its false? 7) If you buy a stolen 60-inch television out of the back of a truck at 2am for $15, you have committed no crime. Why its false? 8) If a person is a suspect in a crime, they mut cooperate fully with law enforcement and answer all questions. Why its false? 9) If you get drunk and then rob a bank, you will be found not guilty. Why its false? 10) A person is guilty of shoplifting if they take merchandise from one part of…
Karen is on the highway headed home from Toronto. Traffic is moving slowly and she sees that an accident is the cause of the slow down. As she gets up to the scene, she notices debris and car parts all over the highway. She panics realizing she will have no choice but to drive over it. As a result, her front tires blow out and she fears damage has been done to the underside of her vehicle as well. How would Karen's insurer typically assess this loss? Comprehensive claim, as she did not hit another auto. Collision claim, as it was a single vehicle, At Fault claim. Collision claim, as it was a single vehicle. Not at Fault claim. Liability claim, as it is the third party's fault for the debris on the road.
help
Arthur owns a property with a large back yard that is usually lit at night by bright floodlights. For months he has been asking local teenagers to stop using his yard as a ‘short-cut’ to the bus stop, but they continue to ignore him. Arthur decides to install an in-ground swimming pool. Last Saturday night, after the pool contractor has spent the day excavating a large hole, Arthur decided not to switch on the floodlights. At 11 pm, one of the teenagers, Gerry, fell into the hole and suffered serious injuries. Explain whether Arthur is likely to be liable in negligence. (Explain the operation of the Australian legal systems and processes relevant to contract and consumer law, including basic principles of the law of torts, particularly relating to negligence and negligent misstatement).
In 2012, Angela took out a $15,000 loan against the cash surrender value of her whole life insurance policy. The funds were required to help pay for remodeling and redecorating her home. As a consequences of taking out the loan Angela had to report $3,000 of policy gain in 2014. She repaid $5,000 of the loan at the end of 2015, as well as paying the $600 of loan interest due for the year. What were the tax consequences to Angela and the policy as a result of the 2015 payments? A. She will be able to deduct $5,600 from her taxable income for 2015 ad the ACB of the policy will increased by $2,000. B. She will be able to deduct $3,000 from her taxable income for 2015 and the ACB of the policy will increase by $2,600. C. She will not be able to claim any deduction from her taxable income for 2015 and the ACB of the policy will increase by $5,650. D. She will be able to deduct $3,600 from her taxable income for 2015 and the ACB of the policy will increase by $2,000
Steve was helping to renovate his friend Ben’s home. Ben realized he needed some pipe to complete a plumbing installation, but didn’t have any cash on him, so Steve gave him $5.00. In consideration of that, Ben said that he would share his $10.00 Super Lotto ticket with Steve, should he win. Ben then took the $5.00, bought the pipe, and Steve installed it. Later that month, Ben was declared the winner of the lottery draw, in the amount of $1,000,000. He tried to hide the fact that he had won, denying to Steve that he was the winner. He later told him that he had only won $50,000, and in any case, that the winner was one of five tickets he had purchased after the one he said he’d split with Steve. Does Steve have an enforceable contract with Ben, such that he’s entitled to half of the $1,000,000? What do you think his chances are if he tries to sue Ben to enforce the contract? Would they be better or worse if Ben hadn’t denied winning in the first place?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS