Petunia is a 16-year-old who is traveling across the country on a road trip. One evening, she stops at the restaurant, Rhonda's Roadhouse, for a tuna mell wrap. However, when the bill arrives, Petunia claims that she does not have to pay it because she is a minor. Which one of the following k true? O Petunia will not have to pay the bill because, as a child, she lacks the capacity to enter into a contract. O Petunia will not have to pay for the food because the restaurant should have known that she was a minor and thus should not have served her. O Petunia will have to pay the full amount of the bill because food is a necessary and minors still have to pay the full price for necessaries.

icon
Related questions
Question
Petunia is a 16-year-old who is traveling across the country on a road trip. One evening, she stops at the restaurant, Rhonda’s Roadhouse, for a tuna melt wrap. However, when the bill arrives, Petunia claims that she does not have to pay it because she is a minor. Which one of the following is true?

- Petunia will not have to pay the bill because, as a child, she lacks the capacity to enter into a contract.

- Petunia will not have to pay for the food because the restaurant should have known that she was a minor and thus should not have served her.

- Petunia will have to pay the full amount of the bill because food is a necessary and minors still have to pay the full price for necessaries.

- Petunia will have to pay for her food, but she likely will not have to pay the full price of the bill because minors are only responsible for paying for the reasonable value of necessaries.

- Petunia will have to pay for her food because minors cannot get out of a contract based on their age.
Transcribed Image Text:Petunia is a 16-year-old who is traveling across the country on a road trip. One evening, she stops at the restaurant, Rhonda’s Roadhouse, for a tuna melt wrap. However, when the bill arrives, Petunia claims that she does not have to pay it because she is a minor. Which one of the following is true? - Petunia will not have to pay the bill because, as a child, she lacks the capacity to enter into a contract. - Petunia will not have to pay for the food because the restaurant should have known that she was a minor and thus should not have served her. - Petunia will have to pay the full amount of the bill because food is a necessary and minors still have to pay the full price for necessaries. - Petunia will have to pay for her food, but she likely will not have to pay the full price of the bill because minors are only responsible for paying for the reasonable value of necessaries. - Petunia will have to pay for her food because minors cannot get out of a contract based on their age.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer