Sue Flay's Cakery promises to pay Oscar Ruitt not to park in a city-designated no-parking zone in front of her store. This agreement is: (Choose all of the correct answers.) Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt has no legal right to park in a city-designated no-parking zone Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt never made any enforceable promise to Sue Flay's Cakery Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is merely making an illusory promise Enforceable because Oscar Ruit is giving up the right to do something he would otherwise have the right to do Enforceable because Sue Flay's Cakery is offering legally sufficient consideration to Oscar Ruitt

icon
Related questions
Question
### Exploring Contract Enforceability

#### Scenario:
Sue Flay's Cakery promises to pay Oscar Ruitt not to park in a city-designated no-parking zone in front of her store. This agreement is:

#### Question:
(Choose **all** of the correct answers.)

#### Options:
1. **Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt has no legal right to park in a city-designated no-parking zone**  
   - If Oscar Ruitt lacks the legal right to perform the action, the promise may not form a valid contract due to lack of legal consideration.
  
2. **Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt never made any enforceable promise to Sue Flay's Cakery**  
   - A contract requires mutual agreement and consideration from both parties. If Oscar Ruitt did not reciprocate with a binding commitment, the contract could be deemed unenforceable.
   
3. **Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is merely making an illusory promise**  
   - An illusory promise appears to be a commitment but does not actually bind the party to any action. This could invalidate the contract.
   
4. **Enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is giving up the right to do something he would otherwise have the right to do**  
   - For a contract to be enforceable, there must be consideration, which involves giving up a legal right or incurring a legal burden. This option suggests enforceability if it can be proven that Oscar had the right to park there.
   
5. **Enforceable because Sue Flay's Cakery is offering legally sufficient consideration to Oscar Ruitt**  
   - Consideration is a fundamental element of a contract where something of value is exchanged. This option posits that Sue Flay's offer is a legally sufficient consideration.

This content helps in understanding the elements that determine the enforceability of a contract, considering legal rights, promises, and the nature of consideration.
Transcribed Image Text:### Exploring Contract Enforceability #### Scenario: Sue Flay's Cakery promises to pay Oscar Ruitt not to park in a city-designated no-parking zone in front of her store. This agreement is: #### Question: (Choose **all** of the correct answers.) #### Options: 1. **Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt has no legal right to park in a city-designated no-parking zone** - If Oscar Ruitt lacks the legal right to perform the action, the promise may not form a valid contract due to lack of legal consideration. 2. **Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt never made any enforceable promise to Sue Flay's Cakery** - A contract requires mutual agreement and consideration from both parties. If Oscar Ruitt did not reciprocate with a binding commitment, the contract could be deemed unenforceable. 3. **Not enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is merely making an illusory promise** - An illusory promise appears to be a commitment but does not actually bind the party to any action. This could invalidate the contract. 4. **Enforceable because Oscar Ruitt is giving up the right to do something he would otherwise have the right to do** - For a contract to be enforceable, there must be consideration, which involves giving up a legal right or incurring a legal burden. This option suggests enforceability if it can be proven that Oscar had the right to park there. 5. **Enforceable because Sue Flay's Cakery is offering legally sufficient consideration to Oscar Ruitt** - Consideration is a fundamental element of a contract where something of value is exchanged. This option posits that Sue Flay's offer is a legally sufficient consideration. This content helps in understanding the elements that determine the enforceability of a contract, considering legal rights, promises, and the nature of consideration.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer